Recommended Posts
QuoteYeah, 9/11 was such a minor inconvenience for the country. Why should he still mention it 4 years after it happened? The terrorists accomplished what they wanted and now they're satisfied.
I'd agree with you if it weren't part of such an overt marketing strategy.
Frank Luntz, one of the republican party's main marketing masterminds (the guy who changed the term global warming to climate change, tax cuts to tax relief, etc) issued a memo a while ago that stated:
Quote"No speech about homeland security or Iraq should begin without a reference to 9/11"
The same guy who tells the president to use these three terms ad nauseum -- basically to use an emotionally loaded event to scare the public into listening to him. The same sh.t that got him re-elected.
Funny how the majority of people who live in the place where 9/11 actually happened aren't scared and aren't falling for it one bit, while so much of the rest of the country is eating it day in and day out.
If you don't see through this tactic and see absolutely nothing wrong with the president abusing 9/11 for his advantage EVERY single speech he's given since 2001, then I think you're not paying enough attention.
Be humble, ask questions, listen, learn, follow the golden rule, talk when necessary, and know when to shut the fuck up.
Still linking 11/9 with Iraq..... YAWN
(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome
(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome
Quotethe last 20 minutes of family guy didn't get tivo'ed thanks to his speech, so now he really pissed me off.
Then you made a much bigger mistake by not recording American Dad. It was better than FG.
SkyDekker 1,465
The best part was watching his eyes go side to side very fast as his brain was trying to keep up with the teleprompter.....
i'm sure i could see the wires that were working him
drive it like you stole it and f*ck the police
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites