Cudlo 0 #1 November 27, 2005 this is just depressing... http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051127/ap_on_re_us/brf_woman_mauled_________________________________________ "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." - Kierkegaard Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kbordson 8 #2 November 27, 2005 Sad for both the sake of the woman and the dogs. She didn't deserve that death. They won't deserve the punishment. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jimbo 0 #3 November 27, 2005 QuoteThey won't deserve the punishment. Agreed. I'm not sure about Rots, but human aggression is NOT a trait of the Pit Bull, not genetically, anyway. For the record, I've never met a human aggressive Rot, either. The owner of these animals ought to be tried for at least manslaughter. - Jim"Like" - The modern day comma Good bye, my friends. You are missed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #4 November 28, 2005 they are dogs, they can get aggressive at any time...it is an animal not a plush toy. Some breeds are more prone to agrissive behaviour than others. The owner is at fault for allowing this to happen. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jimbo 0 #5 November 28, 2005 Agreed on both points. - Jim"Like" - The modern day comma Good bye, my friends. You are missed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #6 November 28, 2005 QuoteSad for both the sake of the woman and the dogs. She didn't deserve that death. They won't deserve the punishment. Killing the dogs is not 'punishing' the dogs. It's just the right thing to do - remove a real threat. The dogs, for whatever reason, are not safe to have in our world and should be destroyed - I don't know what them 'deserving' it means, they killed a woman - what defines 'deserving' if not that? The dog's owner needs to be investigated and 'punished' as well - separate topic. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #7 November 29, 2005 Story excerpt:Lillian had been riding the lawnmower in her front yard when she was attacked. A passer-by saw it, tried to help, but was bitten instead, so he ran into the house looking for Stiles' husband, Jack. "He asked me, he said, 'Do you have a gun ?' And I said, 'Yes.' I came in the house and got my 22 rifle, and as I went outside, one of the dogs was charging toward me, face-to-face, and that's when I shot that dog," Jack said. Jack scared off the other five dogs, but it was too late.It's too bad someone with one of those evil privately-owned firearms didn't get involved sooner - they might have been able to save the poor lady's life. But maybe it's better that little old ladies get mauled to death, rather than to have a bunch of yahoos shooting up the neighborhood trying to help. Or they could have just called 9-1-1 and sat back and waited. But the armed government employees didn't arrive in time. Oh well, too bad, Granny. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
artistcalledian 0 #8 November 29, 2005 Quotethis is just depressing... http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051127/ap_on_re_us/brf_woman_mauled what a silly bitch, i hope those dogs didn't hurt themselves on her !________________________________________ drive it like you stole it and f*ck the police Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sinker 0 #9 November 29, 2005 QuoteQuoteSad for both the sake of the woman and the dogs. She didn't deserve that death. They won't deserve the punishment. Killing the dogs is not 'punishing' the dogs. It's just the right thing to do - remove a real threat. The dogs, for whatever reason, are not safe to have in our world and should be destroyed - I don't know what them 'deserving' it means, they killed a woman - what defines 'deserving' if not that? The dog's owner needs to be investigated and 'punished' as well - separate topic. amen brutha. kill the dogs. try the owner. bury the dead. flog artiscalledian -the artist formerly known as sinker Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
artistcalledian 0 #10 November 29, 2005 QuoteQuoteQuoteSad for both the sake of the woman and the dogs. She didn't deserve that death. They won't deserve the punishment. Killing the dogs is not 'punishing' the dogs. It's just the right thing to do - remove a real threat. The dogs, for whatever reason, are not safe to have in our world and should be destroyed - I don't know what them 'deserving' it means, they killed a woman - what defines 'deserving' if not that? The dog's owner needs to be investigated and 'punished' as well - separate topic. amen brutha. kill the dogs. try the owner. bury the dead. flog artiscalledian She must have antagonised those dogs, they would have just been acting on instinct. i suppose the NRA will be crying out for compulsory arming of grannies now ________________________________________ drive it like you stole it and f*ck the police Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SudsyFist 0 #11 November 29, 2005 Pets don't kill people. Pet owners kill people. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
artistcalledian 0 #12 November 29, 2005 QuotePets don't kill people. Pet owners kill people. hahahahahah too true will all the gun toting red-necks be saying that it's absolutly nothing to do with the dogs, just like when somebody gets shot it's zero percent due to the gun.... hey, guns don't kill people you know !!! not very helpful to the person who's just been shot, but we'll gloss over that________________________________________ drive it like you stole it and f*ck the police Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #13 November 29, 2005 Quotewill all the gun toting red-necks be saying that it's absolutly nothing to do with the dogs, just like when somebody gets shot it's zero percent due to the gun.... hey, guns don't kill people you know !!! not very helpful to the person who's just been shot, but we'll gloss over that Is everyone who carries a gun a redneck? (That sounds like a bigoted comment.) Can you see any difference between; 1) a gun, which is an inanimate lump of steel with no mind of its own and no ability to do anything by itself, and; 2) a dog, which has its own mind, as well as instincts and training, and the ability to do whatever it wants? We'll just gloss over the idiocy of your argument. Maybe you should stick to making sick jokes about things like grandmas being mauled to death by vicious dogs, and Americans getting beheaded by terrorists. At least you're good at being crass and classless. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sinker 0 #14 November 29, 2005 >At least your good at being crass. do one thing, and do it well, so they say... -the artist formerly known as sinker Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
