Yet another waste of research time...

[EricTheRed 0]

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N17728882.htm

illegible usually

[kallend 2,151]

Quote

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N17728882.htm

Given the obesity epidemic, why do you claim it's a waste of time? Clearly these fatsos need something to stop their piggish ways, and the promise of better sex might just be it.

You might think it common sense, but common sense is actually quite uncommon - just look at all the people who voted for Bush.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[EricTheRed 0]

Well, Ok.

It's PR striving to rid the world of fat chicks.

I can deal with that

illegible usually

[SudsyFist 0]

If pathetic asshole losers would just quit fuckin' sticking their depressingly desperate dicks into planetarily plumpin' poons once and for all, we just might rid ourselves of this goddamned fat chick problem.

And I say this with only the utmost of sensitivity, of course.

[sinker 0]

Quote

If pathetic asshole losers would just quit fuckin' sticking their depressingly desperate dicks into planetarily plumpin' poons once and for all, we just might rid ourselves of this goddamned fat chick problem.

And I say this with only the utmost of sensitivity, of course.

but dammit, what about the incredibly lucrative fatty porn industry that you're making $$ off of? don't deny it sudsy... i've seen the mpegs... you like to roll 'em in flour and look for the wet spots... it's just a big (sic) game to ya!

-the artist formerly known as sinker

[SudsyFist 0]

Oatmeal does not taste good COMING OUT MY FREAKING NOSE!

Thanks, sinker. I owe you one.

[sinker 0]

Quote

Oatmeal does not taste good COMING OUT MY FREAKING NOSE!

Thanks, sinker. I owe you one.

oooo... will you gimme the sudsyfist up the yinyang? pretty please?

-the artist formerly known as sinker

[sinker 0]

Quote

Oatmeal does not taste good COMING OUT MY FREAKING NOSE!

Thanks, sinker. I owe you one.

what the f are you doing eating oatmeal at 1:40 in the afternoon anyway? are you still in your peejays?

-the artist formerly known as sinker

[kallend 2,151]

Quote

Quote

Oatmeal does not taste good COMING OUT MY FREAKING NOSE!

Thanks, sinker. I owe you one.

what the f are you doing eating oatmeal at 1:40 in the afternoon anyway? are you still in your peejays?

He's from California!

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[sinker 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Oatmeal does not taste good COMING OUT MY FREAKING NOSE!

Thanks, sinker. I owe you one.

what the f are you doing eating oatmeal at 1:40 in the afternoon anyway? are you still in your peejays?

He's from California!

oh yeah! but why wasn't there any sprouts or tofu up the nose?

-the artist formerly known as sinker

[SudsyFist 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

what the f are you doing eating oatmeal at 1:40 in the afternoon anyway? are you still in your peejays?

He's from California!

oh yeah! but why wasn't there any sprouts or tofu up the nose?

That's the second course, silly. Gosh, the nerve of these uncultured Southerners!

[sinker 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

what the f are you doing eating oatmeal at 1:40 in the afternoon anyway? are you still in your peejays?

He's from California!

oh yeah! but why wasn't there any sprouts or tofu up the nose?

That's the second course, silly. Gosh, the nerve of these uncultured Southerners!

watch your mouth f*cker! I'm from Phoenix! I only reluctantly reside in the south.

-the artist formerly known as sinker

[kallend 2,151]

Quote

I only reluctantly reside in the south.

That shows excellent taste.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

Quote

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N17728882.htm

Given the obesity epidemic, why do you claim it's a waste of time? Clearly these fatsos need something to stop their piggish ways, and the promise of better sex might just be it.

You might think it common sense, but common sense is actually quite uncommon - just look at all the people who voted for Bush.

Bad example. A better comparison would be-just look at all the people who voted against Bush.

[ReBirth 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N17728882.htm

Given the obesity epidemic, why do you claim it's a waste of time? Clearly these fatsos need something to stop their piggish ways, and the promise of better sex might just be it.

You might think it common sense, but common sense is actually quite uncommon - just look at all the people who voted for Bush.

Bad example. A better comparison would be-just look at all the people who voted against Bush.

Is that the "I'm rubber and you're glue" comeback?

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N17728882.htm

Given the obesity epidemic, why do you claim it's a waste of time? Clearly these fatsos need something to stop their piggish ways, and the promise of better sex might just be it.

You might think it common sense, but common sense is actually quite uncommon - just look at all the people who voted for Bush.

Bad example. A better comparison would be-just look at all the people who voted against Bush.

Is that the "I'm rubber and you're glue" comeback?

Nope. Just pointing out that a better definition of uncommon sense is voting against someone rather than for someone else. To do so requires little intelligence.

[sinker 0]

Quote

Quote

I only reluctantly reside in the south.

That shows excellent taste.

that's the nicest thing you've ever said to me, john! and then, w/ our decision to relo to the great state of Illinois, man, my stock must be soaring w/ you, eh? (don't push it sinker...)

-the artist formerly known as sinker

[tso-d_chris 0]

Quote

Just pointing out that a better definition of uncommon sense is voting against someone rather than for someone else. To do so requires little intelligence.

Just to recap:

1. We have a two party system.

2. Neither party has fielded a qualified candidate for at least the last two elections.

It is not intelligence that is lacking among voters. What is lacking is qualified candidates and honest debate. It also wouldn't hurt if we had mainstream media that was not owned and influenced by corporations with their own stake in the political game.

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

Quote

Just pointing out that a better definition of uncommon sense is voting against someone rather than for someone else. To do so requires little intelligence.

Just to recap:

1. We have a two party system.

2. Neither party has fielded a qualified candidate for at least the last two elections.

It is not intelligence that is lacking among voters. What is lacking is qualified candidates and honest debate. It also wouldn't hurt if we had mainstream media that was not owned and influenced by corporations with their own stake in the political game.

Of course I agree, but that's besides the point. Be careful of what or whom you vote against. You might not like what you end up with.

[tso-d_chris 0]

Quote

Be careful of what or whom you vote against. You might not like what you end up with.

It is safe to say that is precisely why so many people could not bring themselves to vote against Kerry, as poor a candidate as he was.

I think for the most part, their fears have manifested.

[sinker 0]

Quote

Quote

Be careful of what or whom you vote against. You might not like what you end up with.

It is safe to say that is precisely why so many people could not bring themselves to vote against Kerry, as poor a candidate as he was.

I think for the most part, their fears have manifested.

that's part of the reason I still have a hard time voting... settling for whomever I think is the "lesser" of the two evils just doesn't sit well in my conscience... but that's our system...

-the artist formerly known as sinker

[tso-d_chris 0]

So on one hand, you have the option of voting for the least undesireable candidate, and on the other hand you can not vote, which is one of the, if not the, most important civic responsibilities one has in a representative government.

Isn't that choosing the lesser of two evils, also?

[sinker 0]

Quote

So on one hand, you have the option of voting for the least undesireable candidate, and on the other hand you can not vote, which is one of the, if not the, most important civic responsibilities one has in a representative government.

Isn't that choosing the lesser of two evils, also?

I didn't say I DIDN'T vote, that would be a greater evil than not voting at all...

-the artist formerly known as sinker

[tso-d_chris 0]

Quote

I didn't say I DIDN'T vote, that would be a greater evil than not voting at all...

My bad.

Nonetheless I think the point is still valid for many people.

I really wish we had ranked voting, so that third parties would really be an option, and the average voter would not feel as though they are throwing away their vote if they don't vote for one of the Big Two.

Incidentally, there is no known system of voting that is fair, from a mathematical perspective, 100% of the time.

[sinker 0]

Quote

Quote

I didn't say I DIDN'T vote, that would be a greater evil than not voting at all...

My bad.

Nonetheless I think the point is still valid for many people.

I really wish we had ranked voting, so that third parties would really be an option, and the average voter would not feel as though they are throwing away their vote if they don't vote for one of the Big Two.

Incidentally, there is no known system of voting that is fair, from a mathematical perspective, 100% of the time.

no sweat man... but I totally agree about the "throwing away the vote" feeling...

-the artist formerly known as sinker