EricTheRed 0 #1 August 30, 2005 http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/29/international/middleeast/29journalists.html Kinda harsh though.illegible usually Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skycop 0 #2 August 30, 2005 Run around in a war zone with a camera on your shoulder, looks an awful lot like an RPG....... I say reporting from a war zone can be hazardous to your health. "Just 'cause I'm simple, don't mean I'm stewpid!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darius11 12 #3 August 30, 2005 It is a war zone. He made a choice to be in it. Enough said. May he RIP.I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." - Kurt Cobain Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
n23x 0 #4 August 30, 2005 Then again, if they can't tell a video camera and a boom mike from weapons of war, what other mistakes might occur? Does that make it ok? .jim"Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trent 0 #5 August 30, 2005 We can't profile weapons just because of the way they look... otherwise the bad guys will start using weapons that look like boom mics and cameras.Oh, hello again! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,107 #6 August 30, 2005 Happening a lot lately. More journalists have been killed in Iraq than were killed in Vietnam. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #7 August 30, 2005 Could that be because there are more jurnos in Iraq than there were in Vietnam? (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,107 #8 August 30, 2005 >Could that be because there are more jurnos in Iraq than there >were in Vietnam? Yep, and they need more support. Reporters don't go into combat with a pad of paper and a camera any more. Now there will be a team of 3-4 journalists running around, taking pictures and being targets. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #9 August 30, 2005 Not sure if this is true, but I heard/read (?) that not many journalists were up at the front during Vietnam, preferring/(or required to) stay back at the hotels waiting for stories to be handed to them... Is this the case? (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tink1717 2 #10 August 30, 2005 It might take a while longer, but it is WAY more effective than indirect methods.Skydivers don't knock on Death's door. They ring the bell and runaway... It really pisses him off. -The World Famous Tink. (I never heard of you either!!) AA #2069 ASA#33 POPS#8808 Swooo 1717 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #11 August 31, 2005 QuoteNot sure if this is true, but I heard/read (?) that not many journalists were up at the front during Vietnam, preferring/(or required to) stay back at the hotels waiting for stories to be handed to them... Is this the case? I believe you are correct, but if you run a search of current news events, the editor of the Tampa Tribune emailed a senior editor at AP in NY to find more news out of Iraq and obtain greater breadth of stories. The AP response was essentially: "A lot of our reporters don't leave the hotel". So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites