Recommended Posts
jdhill 0
QuoteShe may not share many peoples views (maybe not even her sons) but she still has every right to protest without being abused or insulted.
Funny, I didn't see that in the Consitution... she has a right to protest, sure... but others have the right to insult her too... I don't see anyone abusing her, a least not in a phyiscal sense... I do see some of the anti-Bush crowd taking advantage of her though...
It is sad that she lost her son to the war, and now she is losing her husband to these theatrics... will the anti-Bush bunch be around to comfort her when it is all said and done?
J
rehmwa 2
But can you know that's what she is doing? If so, then her grief is at a very unhealthy and psychotic level (I mean really, stalking the president of the US?) and she could be violent.
Would you stalk the president?, why not congressmen, why not the UN, why not Sadam, why not go to Iraq and find the individual directly responsible for killing her son?
Best she finds counseling if she's really that distraught, or a better purpose if she's just an activist and this is her hook.
...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants
Or we could bomb his innocent countrymen/women& children back into the stoneage (for the Greater good

.
(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome
billvon 3,118
So you know her son better than she does, eh? That seems a bit presumptious.
>As far as 'jobless stink hippies', all the people showing up to camp
> with here are mostly the same band of gypsies that travel the
> country looking for the spotlight, a tent, people to piss off, and
>to waste everyone's time.
Do you think the same of the protesters who showed up to support Terry Schiavo?
Channman 2
Seems they have no qualms bombing innocent children, including their own countrymen back into the stoneage, hell I believe we both have given witness to this fact for years now on National TV.
Their families are willing to take money $25,000 a child to send them off not only to kill themselves but little babies, their mothers, fathers, brother, sisters...all for the GREATER GOOD?
Ha.. Well that's alright then - problem solved

Their leader pissed off our leaders and the kids have to die - Oh how proud am I?
(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome
QuoteQuoteNow a woman who lost her son is a "jobless stink hippy." Wow. Excellent slam on a woman who lost her son fighting for you.
Bill,
She didn't giver her son!!!!!!!!!!! HE GAVE HIS LIFE FOR THIS COUNTRY! Don't confsue his real sacrifice with her loss. She obviously never wanted him to go and might as well be pissing on his grave right now.
Can you say "strawman"? Where did he say she "gave" her son? It looks to me like he said she "lost" her son.
Blues,
Dave
(drink Mountain Dew)
QuoteThat's certainly how you would feel in her situation (empathy is a great thing).
But can you know that's what she is doing? If so, then her grief is at a very unhealthy and psychotic level (I mean really, stalking the president of the US?) and she could be violent.
Would you stalk the president?, why not congressmen, why not the UN, why not Sadam, why not go to Iraq and find the individual directly responsible for killing her son?
Best she finds counseling if she's really that distraught, or a better purpose if she's just an activist and this is her hook.
That's not stalking. She's using her right of free speech. I surely would do the same in her place. Being left behind after own kid died, surely is not normal and should not be described as "unhealthy... or on a "psychotic level"....
Isn't GWB the one responsible for that complete desaster? Isn't he the one talking, praising, trying to convince everyone about/for his war in Iraq? GWB is the one leaning out the window, talking about "noble causes..."
(OK, OK, I know, in fact, it's not "his brain" behind all

I saw her talking in TV. Talking in quiet words, she kept calm, no big emotions, not looking silly at all, not like any activist (what a tasteless word for a mother in such situation!).
My general opinion (and not explicitly adressed to you):
It seems to be easier to talk in heroic words about the guys which are killed for a "noble cause" (these 2 words alone just give me a huge migraine attack!) but, much harder to look behind the curtains: The families in sorrow ... They are not welcome. If one of them, like this mother now, dares to show up, it suddenly is a matter of left or right. OK, perhaps she's now using the media for her cause. Why not?
Rehmwa, it's a little unfair to point out that "empathy is a great thing": I'm old enough to use both, heart and brain.

Christel
dudeist skydiver # 3105
QuoteI empathise with her but, nobody owes her anything.
How about a little respect and gratitude?! Do you feel the same way about Marie Tillman?
When our young troops are off dying in battle, some families are going to have to shoulder a burden of grief. Be grateful this woman is bearing that cross and you're not. I think we all owe at least a little fucking respect to the families who lose their loved ones in the advancement of our national agenda, whether we agree with that agenda or not.
How do you feel about the people who spat on returning Vietnam vets and called them all manner of nasty names? I get a similar reaction seeing people here calling this woman an idiot, stink-hippy, attention-hound. Walk a mile in her shoes, lose your own child to the war, then come back and tell us whether you deserve to be the object of ridicule for not being very fucking happy about it.
Blues,
Dave
(drink Mountain Dew)
gemini 0
QuotePerhaps, few words, some attention of him would solve that situation and help a crying mother to go home and grieve for the death of her son?
He did meet with her. She didn't like what he said or his attitude. On the same day he met with her, he met with other families. I listened to an interview with several and they talked about how sincere, friendly and humble the President was and how much time he spent with each of them.
They were satisfied with their meeting, but she was not. BUT she did get her time with him! He did not avoid her as she claims.
Blue skies,
Jim
Mirage63 0
Quote
WB is making a fool of a mother which lost her son in a war for which he is responsible, him alone and no one else.
This is such crap. That's right W made up all the intel, in fact he knew that the British, Germans, French ect, ect were wrong.
Being against the war is great but statements like the above are just crazy

Always always remember its ALL George W Bush fault. EVERYTHING, nobody else.
AAAAGGGGGGGGAAAGG
As I posted in my original post, put youself in the shoes of the peoples yards these people are crapping in. Sit in traffic trying to get home to your kids.
There is a way to do this without violating W's innocent neighbors.
Her son getting killed does not give her the right to violate other peoples lives. HER SON VOLUNTEERED.
--
billvon 3,118
>>which he is responsible, him alone and no one else.
>This is such crap.
It's crap that he's responsible for what our armed forces do? I think perhaps a peek at the organizational chart of the US Armed Forces might be in order if you think that's crap.
I know Bill believes this all has been built up by the Right, but the wacko left is very much supporting her. As this goes on I believe its doing more harm to the liberal left than good because the majority of Americans do not stand with Cindy's protest they stand with her son's sacrifice. Sometimes its best, to just get out of the way and let them self destruct.
With reference to the War and fighting terrorist, there are only two ways to change an evil man. 1. Change his heart or 2. Put a bullet through his brain.
As I say, its not always easy being RIGHT, but its a burdan im willing to bear.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites