0
SpeedRacer

Interesting commentary re. appeasement of the enemy

Recommended Posts

I'm not a big fan of the current administration, or the invasion of Iraq.

But there are some here who, although I agree with them on the above topics, I disagree with them when they descend into the limp-wristed moral relativism as described in the article.
Speed Racer
--------------------------------------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is an interesting article. Points out some "don't wanna head there" kind of stuff, and identifies at least one slippery slope.

thanks for posting it.

Wendy W.
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just wanted to point out that this paragraph:

Quote

The BBC now refuses to refer to the London terrorists as "terrorists." They are to be known by the more neutral term "bombers," lest the public be deceived by "the careless use of words which carry emotional or value judgments." Value judgments about blowing up innocent commuters? How gauche!



Is entirely wrong. The BBC used the term "terrorists" maybe a dozen times during my drive home this evening. A check of their website will show they're using it regularly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0