rehmwa 2 #26 July 1, 2005 Quoteto bar federal transportation funds from being used to make improvements on lands seized via eminent domain for private development. Freaking NUTS - Congress passes laws, the Supremem Court is supposed to enforce those laws when they get REinterpreted incorrectly by lower courts. It's very direct, Congress can rewrite the eminent domain rules to make this type of abuse illegal. What the HELL are they doing? Why can't they face the solution directly instead of this push in through a side window approach using their stupid 'all purpose hammer and duct tape' threat of tranportation funding. NUTS QuoteHouse Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California says she is opposed to any legislation that would withhold federal dollars Why would we even be surprised? Nutjobs like Pelosi can't put their pants on in the morning they are so tied up with things that don't make a difference in the world. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
happythoughts 0 #27 July 1, 2005 QuoteI'd hate to be the judge hearing that case. Talk about pressure. A member of the SC as a defendant in your courtroom! I know an attorney with just a very small amount of liability insurance. "Anyone who wants to sue me, can. I'll keep them in court so long that their heirs will never see the money." If you wrestle a pig in the sty, you discover that you can't win because the pig doesn't care and he kinda likes the mud. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
