0
funks

Fuck the Race Card Part II

Recommended Posts

Quote



A known fact? Unless you mean Africans enslaved other Africans on the continent of Africa you simply wrong.



Sorry, but you are wrong. Did you click on the link to the article posted in this thread? Obviously not. Here is a snippet:

In 1860 there were at least six Negroes in Louisiana who owned 65 or more slaves The largest number, 152 slaves, were owned by the widow C. Richards and her son P.C. Richards, who owned a large sugar cane plantation. Another Negro slave magnate in Louisiana, with over 100 slaves, was Antoine Dubuclet, a sugar planter whose estate was valued at (in 1860 dollars) $264,000 (3). That year, the mean wealth of southern white men was $3,978 (4).

In Charleston, South Carolina in 1860 125 free Negroes owned slaves; six of them owning 10 or more. Of the $1.5 million in taxable property owned by free Negroes in Charleston, more than $300,000 represented slave holdings (5). In North Carolina 69 free Negroes were slave owners (6).


What do you think about that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



We live in a time where as Americans, we cannot afford to be divided. I'm sure Al Queda would gladly kill black Americans just as quickly as the would kill white Americans. How's that for equal treatment?

Walt



But if Al Qaida had a white man and a black man in front of them and only killed the white man i have a feeling the black man would bitch for feeling left out and excluded;):ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote



We live in a time where as Americans, we cannot afford to be divided. I'm sure Al Queda would gladly kill black Americans just as quickly as the would kill white Americans. How's that for equal treatment?

Walt



But if Al Qaida had a white man and a black man in front of them and only killed the white man i have a feeling the black man would bitch for feeling left out and excluded;):ph34r:



Doubt it--he'd be yelling "Kill Whitey!!!" the whole time.

Walt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Doubt it--he'd be yelling "Kill Whitey!!!" the whole time.


I like the direction this thread is heading.:|

"For once you have tasted Absinthe you will walk the earth with your eyes turned towards the gutter, for there you have been and there you will long to return."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Without wanting to distract the posters in this thread with facts, this recent paper provides some good information on the subject of social mobility, with contrast to certain european countries.

Many people (including many red blooded Americans) seem to think there's a lot of social mobility in the states. This is true in the relative sense when comparing to other parts of the world, such as population centers China and India. But it's not altogether true in the absolute sense--there's still a very distinct correlation between the social stratum you're born in and the one you die.

In terms of cohorts, you're more likely to achieve a smaller change in your stratum than a larger change, and the poorer you are the harder it is to move up even one notch. So in absolute terms the picture is actually not all that pretty since the population is weighted toward the poorer end of the spectrum--the number of people moving from the low end to the high end is fairly small.

It's better in the States than you could do in most other parts of the world. And certain parts of the world, like parts of Europe, have more mobility than the US.

A google search for social mobility usa turns up a lot more than I want to wade through tonight.

nathaniel
My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"I think it IS that simple. Human is human. Many in the black community seem to have a very separatist, i.e., "us vs. them" attitude yet bitterly complain that they are not treated as equals. I don't think they can have it both ways. Either they can join the party and expect equal treatment or continue to completely reject the system and, as a consequence, continue to feel like outsiders looking in. Either way, it's a conscious choice.

We live in a time where as Americans, we cannot afford to be divided. I'm sure Al Queda would gladly kill black Americans just as quickly as the would kill white Americans. How's that for equal treatment?"


A human is a human but there are differences. It's naive and short sighted to think we're all the same when there are so many indicators of differences between us. As I've said before in other threads, differences aren't bad and should be celebrated. Where we run into trouble is in trying to treat everyone like they're like everyone else. In some instances that's how things should work but in others it isn't. Example of differences...

There's a thread on here somewhere about the craziest thing you've ever said to a cop. As soon as I saw the thread, one of the first things that went through my head was "Being Black you don't get smart with cops unless you want to get fucked up or fucked with." As I read through the thread I couldn't believe some of the things people claimed to have said to cops. They could be exagerrating or just lying, but taking them at face value, there's NO way most Black people I know would ever consider addressing a cop that way. It's different. The interaction is different. We're different from one another.

Al Queda has absolutely nothing to do with this as it's an international issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry, but you are wrong. Did you click on the link to the article posted in this thread? Obviously not. Here is a snippet:

In 1860 there were at least six Negroes in Louisiana who owned 65 or more slaves The largest number, 152 slaves, were owned by the widow C. Richards and her son P.C. Richards, who owned a large sugar cane plantation. Another Negro slave magnate in Louisiana, with over 100 slaves, was Antoine Dubuclet, a sugar planter whose estate was valued at (in 1860 dollars) $264,000 (3). That year, the mean wealth of southern white men was $3,978 (4).

In Charleston, South Carolina in 1860 125 free Negroes owned slaves; six of them owning 10 or more. Of the $1.5 million in taxable property owned by free Negroes in Charleston, more than $300,000 represented slave holdings (5). In North Carolina 69 free Negroes were slave owners (6).


What do you think about that?



Assuming it's true, it changes nothing. Assuming it's true, it's still wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"But if Al Qaida had a white man and a black man in front of them and only killed the white man i have a feeling the black man would bitch for feeling left out and excluded."

Again, this speaks to your level of understanding of Black people. Or your terrible sense of humor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In trying to read the social mobility article, I have one question. What is keeping the poorer people of the US from upward social mobility?

Here is what I see...bright, African-American students in my high school who are harrassed by their African-American peer if they take honors classes or even do well in regular classes. They are keeping each other from finding the success in high school that would lead to scholorships and higher education.

~Anne

I'm a Doll!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

In trying to read the social mobility article, I have one question. What is keeping the poorer people of the US from upward social mobility?



because (with a few exceptions) it takes money, and social connections as well as drive and determination to create a significant increase in individual wealth... having the later is great, but having the former and a few basic starting opportunites that the poor do not is a MUCH easier path...
____________________________________
Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


What is keeping the poorer people of the US from upward social mobility?



I don't know if that question has an easy answer. Why is always much harder to say than that.

It's much easier to measure incomes than cultural influences and leadership.

One thing to keep in mind when reading that paper is that most other countries, and "old" Europe / Canada in particular, all tend to be very different from the US in terms of their demographics. That is, the US has a much wider range of incomes and wealth. There's really not that much National Geographic style abject poverty in France/Germany/Scandinavia/Canada. So it's particularly hard even to make sense out of direct comparisons. Those places all have more extensive social infrastructures, but at the same time it's much easier for them to have more extensive social infrastructures because there's relatively few people who need the most support.

You could probably say they have less poverty because they have had less poverty. One fact that strikes me in particular is lifetime earnings figures on people who lived through the Great Depression as adults. In terms of sheer statistics, by virtue of having been employable through the Depression one's capacity to produce and earn money was sharply diminished. It is as though a contagion afflicted them.

So I think this is where a lot of social activists get the idea that poverty should be cured, even at great expense. Tho, it's not at all clear to me that it could be cured with any expense. It bends the mind.

nathaniel
My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir. The bums will always lose. Do you hear me, Lebowski?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
not addressed to anyone in particular:

Now, more often, it isn't so much a factor of race as it is socioeconomic status. A kid from the inner city simply doesn't have the same educational opportunities as a kid from suburbia, no matter the race. It also tends to be more difficult to get higher education if your parents aren't educated, due to both social and financial issues. Most kids in college (and high school) have their parents paying a good portion of their expenses, and sometimes even their tuition. College is a heck of a lot easier for the kids who don't have to worry about where their next meal is coming from.

Everyone doesn't have equal educational opportunities. That's not saying that some people with less opportunity can't succeed, it's just a lot more difficult, so the cycle of poverty and poor education continues.

I don't think that "affirmative action" is a good way to go about fixing an issue like this, because race does not dictate socioeconomic status. The other problem with AA is that people are given opportunities they're not prepared for. What's the point of letting a student into Yale or Harvard that wouldn't have been admitted if not for their race? That student is probably not prepared for a situation like that, and it seems like a good way to set them up for failure, simply because they don't have a comparable educational background. I'm not saying they can't succeed, just that it's a lot less likely.

There's got to be a better way to address issues like this. I'm just not really sure what it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

"But if Al Qaida had a white man and a black man in front of them and only killed the white man i have a feeling the black man would bitch for feeling left out and excluded."

Again, this speaks to your level of understanding of Black people. Or your terrible sense of humor.



He was being sarcastic. Personally, I thought it was pretty funny, but I've got a very twisted sense of humor.

Walt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

A human is a human but there are differences. It's naive and short sighted to think we're all the same when there are so many indicators of differences between us. As I've said before in other threads, differences aren't bad and should be celebrated. Where we run into trouble is in trying to treat everyone like they're like everyone else. In some instances that's how things should work but in others it isn't.


Clearly there are strong cultural differences between "White America" and "Black America", but I think there are a lot more similarities than differences. There are a lot of very vocal people in the black community that seem to focus far more on the differences than the similarities.

I accept the differences. What do you want me to do besides acknowledge the differences? Why do so many blacks feel that those differences are huge obstacles to overcome? In the past, it was indeed whites who were putting up the walls between blacks and whites. These days, it seems to be the other way around. What's the deal?


Quote


Example of differences...

There's a thread on here somewhere about the craziest thing you've ever said to a cop. As soon as I saw the thread, one of the first things that went through my head was "Being Black you don't get smart with cops unless you want to get fucked up or fucked with." As I read through the thread I couldn't believe some of the things people claimed to have said to cops. They could be exagerrating or just lying, but taking them at face value, there's NO way most Black people I know would ever consider addressing a cop that way. It's different. The interaction is different. We're different from one another.



That is a very interesting comment. I do not mean this in any sarcastic way, but my perception as a 48 year old white boy (and I've always had this attitude) is that if I get smartass with a cop, I'm not likely to get any slack at all because cops will assume that I know better than to pull that kind of stupid shit. Flunking the attitude test with a cop can truly be a bad thing.

The one time I have mouthed off to a cop was when the cop was threatening me without reason and I figured I was screwed no matter what I said.

Quote


Al Queda has absolutely nothing to do with this as it's an international issue.



I mentioned Al Queda because the continued divisiveness between blacks and whites in this country is an advantage to them. They see us all as evil, regardless of skin color. We need to be united as a country.

I mentioned divisiveness between blacks and whites. I probably should have phrased it as divisiveness between blacks and non-blacks.

Years ago, a friend who was very frustrated from dealing with racial tensions in the workplace said this to me.

"Let me see if I've got this straight:
- Blacks and whites don't get along.
- Mexicans and blacks don't get along.
- Asians and blacks don't get along.

Do you notice a common thread?"

I don't mean the above as an attack, but I suspect it is a very common perception among non-black people in this country--whether expressed in those words or not. The perception is that blacks seem to have a lot of hostility toward other ethnic groups and don't seem to be all that interested in letting go of that hostility.

If you really want to get a good discussion going among people who have been working in corporate America for a while, bring up the topic of "Diversity Training". I have heard of "diversity training" being held in a predominately black workplace. Diversity training, from what I've heard doesn't have anything to do with diversity--it has to do with putting a spotlight on how different black people are. To me, that's nuts. Again, I think the focus should be on finding a common ground.

Walt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Sorry, but you are wrong. Did you click on the link to the article posted in this thread? Obviously not. Here is a snippet:

In 1860 there were at least six Negroes in Louisiana who owned 65 or more slaves The largest number, 152 slaves, were owned by the widow C. Richards and her son P.C. Richards, who owned a large sugar cane plantation. Another Negro slave magnate in Louisiana, with over 100 slaves, was Antoine Dubuclet, a sugar planter whose estate was valued at (in 1860 dollars) $264,000 (3). That year, the mean wealth of southern white men was $3,978 (4).

In Charleston, South Carolina in 1860 125 free Negroes owned slaves; six of them owning 10 or more. Of the $1.5 million in taxable property owned by free Negroes in Charleston, more than $300,000 represented slave holdings (5). In North Carolina 69 free Negroes were slave owners (6).

What do you think about that?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Assuming it's true, it changes nothing. Assuming it's true, it's still wrong.



How does it not change anything? You have Blacks that sold blacks into slavery in Africa. And you have Blacks that owned Blacks here....

How am I as a white guy whose family had no slaves owe anything to the decendants of a back man sold into slavery by a black man that was bought by a black man?
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[replyone of the first things that went through my head was "Being Black you don't get smart with cops unless you want to get fucked up or fucked with.



That right there is your problem. Why did you bring your skin color into the cop situation???:S What does being black have to do with mouthing off to a cop and facing the consequences???

If I was ever harrassed by a black cop or mouthed off to one the last thing i would do is think that he is being a dick to me because i am white. I would simply think either he is an asshole or perhaps I am being an asshole....Yes, sometimes skin color is an issue, but to rely on that as an excuse or assume that is the cause is a scapegoat.

There is way to much crying going on about racial injustices. My point here is that black people tend to make a mountain out of a mole hill.

Society does not owe the black man anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

College is a heck of a lot easier for the kids who don't have to worry about where their next meal is coming from.



My school is paid for by the US Army. Almost ANYONE can join the Army, do three years and for 1200 taken out 100.00/mth for the first year get 33,000 for school.

I get a check for 1,004/mth to go to school. I have a job, so I don't worry where my next meal is.

Almost anyone could do that.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Sorry, but you are wrong. Did you click on the link to the article posted in this thread? Obviously not. Here is a snippet:

In 1860 there were at least six Negroes in Louisiana who owned 65 or more slaves The largest number, 152 slaves, were owned by the widow C. Richards and her son P.C. Richards, who owned a large sugar cane plantation. Another Negro slave magnate in Louisiana, with over 100 slaves, was Antoine Dubuclet, a sugar planter whose estate was valued at (in 1860 dollars) $264,000 (3). That year, the mean wealth of southern white men was $3,978 (4).

In Charleston, South Carolina in 1860 125 free Negroes owned slaves; six of them owning 10 or more. Of the $1.5 million in taxable property owned by free Negroes in Charleston, more than $300,000 represented slave holdings (5). In North Carolina 69 free Negroes were slave owners (6).


What do you think about that?



Assuming it's true, it changes nothing. Assuming it's true, it's still wrong.



It doesnt change your view on so called retribution that the black community believes it is owed?

How do you know you yourself does not come from a generation of slave owners? Wouldnt that make you just as guilty as you believe the white man to be???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"The other problem with AA is that people are given opportunities they're not prepared for"

I disagree. Once you get in you still have to do the work. The attrition rate for minorities is the same as that of non minorities at major universities. There was a piece on 20/20 about AA at the university of michigan that discussed that exact stat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Clearly there are strong cultural differences between "White America" and "Black America", but I think there are a lot more similarities than differences. There are a lot of very vocal people in the black community that seem to focus far more on the differences than the similarities."

I accept the differences. What do you want me to do besides acknowledge the differences? Why do so many blacks feel that those differences are huge obstacles to overcome? In the past, it was indeed whites who were putting up the walls between blacks and whites. These days, it seems to be the other way around. What's the deal?"


Outside of everyone's favorite targets in the Black community, those being Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, name two other "very vocal people" who preach about the differences.

Based on what you've said thus far it really doesn't seem like you accept the differences. It sounds more like you think we're all the same, we're just different colors. It's just not that simple. I don't feel like "those differences are huge obstacles to overcome" and neither do friends of mine. If you honestly feel Black people feel that way then I'd say you only know one type Black person.



"That is a very interesting comment. I do not mean this in any sarcastic way, but my perception as a 48 year old white boy (and I've always had this attitude) is that if I get smartass with a cop, I'm not likely to get any slack at all because cops will assume that I know better than to pull that kind of stupid shit. Flunking the attitude test with a cop can truly be a bad thing.

The one time I have mouthed off to a cop was when the cop was threatening me without reason and I figured I was screwed no matter what I said."


Let me tell you about the times I've mouthed off to cops or friends of mine mouthed off to cops. We haven't. Best case scenario they ask you whose car you're driving (I've been asked this question EVERY time I've been pulled over), berate and chastise you, and give you a ticket. Worst case scenario the beat your ass (yes it's happened to me and friends of mine), tow your car, and lock you up until they "drop the charges." I'm not saying the same things don't happen to non Black people. My point is that's more Black people's experience with cops than it isn't. My experience is my reality.


"I mentioned Al Queda because the continued divisiveness between blacks and whites in this country is an advantage to them. They see us all as evil, regardless of skin color. We need to be united as a country."


I really don't see how it's an advantage to anyone outside the country. When the planes hit the twin towers everyone got upset. Black people didn't just shrug their shoulders and say "Oh well. That's what whitey gets." We live here too, so it affected us the same way.


"Years ago, a friend who was very frustrated from dealing with racial tensions in the workplace said this to me.

"Let me see if I've got this straight:
- Blacks and whites don't get along.
- Mexicans and blacks don't get along.
- Asians and blacks don't get along.

Do you notice a common thread?"

I don't mean the above as an attack, but I suspect it is a very common perception among non-black people in this country--whether expressed in those words or not. The perception is that blacks seem to have a lot of hostility toward other ethnic groups and don't seem to be all that interested in letting go of that hostility."


It could also be said Whites and Mexicans don't get along, Asians and Mexicans don't get along, Dominicans and Puerto Ricans don't get along... I could go on.

The perception you speak of comes from a lack of dialogue in part. If these same people with this perception sat down and spoke with someone they viewed in this light I think they'd come away with a different understanding. It's not always about agreeing. Seeing someone else's perspective is just as, if not more important.

"If you really want to get a good discussion going among people who have been working in corporate America for a while, bring up the topic of "Diversity Training". I have heard of "diversity training" being held in a predominately black workplace. Diversity training, from what I've heard doesn't have anything to do with diversity--it has to do with putting a spotlight on how different black people are. To me, that's nuts. Again, I think the focus should be on finding a common ground."

I've never been to diversity training so I realy can't comment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"How does it not change anything? You have Blacks that sold blacks into slavery in Africa. And you have Blacks that owned Blacks here....

How am I as a white guy whose family had no slaves owe anything to the decendants of a back man sold into slavery by a black man that was bought by a black man?"

First Africans selling each other in slavery and Blacks owning slaves here are two different issues that occurred in two different countries. Yes, Africans sold each other into slavery. That was a smaller part of how Africans ended up here. The larger part is Europeans capturing Africans and enslaving them. Tell the whole story.

Second, assuming there were "six Negroes" in Louisiana and "125 free Negroes" who owned slaves what do you think the percentage of all slave owners they comprise during it's 400 year history? A drop in the bucket.

Addressing your question about owing descendants of slaves something, I've never in any thread on here said anything about reparations. To me it's tantamount to arguing about who would win in a fight between Captain Kirk and Bruce Lee. It'll never happen so why bother discussing it. Unless of course it could be used as a tool to divide people. Interesting thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Favor to ask..Can you edit your post and use the "quote" function. I cant figure out which are your statements and which are the person you are quoting....if your not sure how to use the quote feature just click on "quote" at the beginning of the other persons sentence, and then click it again at the end of it. You can then type your response. Continue as needed....thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


"If you really want to get a good discussion going among people who have been working in corporate America for a while, bring up the topic of "Diversity Training". I have heard of "diversity training" being held in a predominately black workplace. Diversity training, from what I've heard doesn't have anything to do with diversity--it has to do with putting a spotlight on how different black people are. To me, that's nuts. Again, I think the focus should be on finding a common ground."

I've never been to diversity training so I realy can't comment.



I've had to go through diversity training, and I don't work in a predominately black workplace. There is a pretty good mix of everybody.

The training was not really about differences between people, but was to encourage people to realize that everyone has a different perspective, and something that seems harmless to one person might offend another. For a boring corporate seminar thingy, it was actually pretty decent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"That right there is your problem. Why did you bring your skin color into the cop situation???:S What does being black have to do with mouthing off to a cop and facing the consequences???"

My point is the consequences are different. You'd have to be extra naive to believe everyone is treated solely on their actions. In a perfect world, yes. Here, no.

"If I was ever harrassed by a black cop or mouthed off to one the last thing i would do is think that he is being a dick to me because i am white. I would simply think either he is an asshole or perhaps I am being an asshole....Yes, sometimes skin color is an issue, but to rely on that as an excuse or assume that is the cause is a scapegoat."

I'm not relying on color being an issue, I'm saying it's part of the issue. You seem to think it plays little to no part. I'm saying that's a naive way of thinking


"There is way to much crying going on about racial injustices. My point here is that black people tend to make a mountain out of a mole hill."

You keep repeating yourself. And I'll keep disagreeing with you. if something is wrong then ANYONE has the right and responsibility to talk about it. Making a mountain out of a mole hill is sometimes a matter of perspective which goes back to something I said earlier. Dialogue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0