Female rape victims in CO should stay away from Catholic Hospitals
By
CanuckInUSA, in Speakers Corner

The bible is fiction. Deal with it.

Try not to worry about the things you have no control over
rushmc 23
QuoteQuoteQuote
Any doctor that is going to deny their patient information because of their own religious beliefs shouldn't be a doctor.
OH, I understand. One can live by their own morals unles you disagree with those very morals.![]()
Then you ask the government to enforce "your" morals on those that don't agree with you.
Makes normal liberal sence to me
What the hell are you talking about?
What don't you understand. If you don't agree with my position make a law the forces me to comply.
I wouldn't agree with a law that forces anyone to perform a prodecure or treatment that goes against their religious beliefs. Read my post above (information being the key word).
I would say that a doctor has an obligation to their patient to provide them with all the information and options available that is relavent to their situation, regardless of their religion.
I never said that they should be forced to provide those options, just let the patient know they exist.
The key here is what is relavant to you. You want the doctors or hopital to comform to your beliefs!!!!!
If the won't, because they disagree, you would make a law and force them.
Simple isn't it?
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
rushmc 23
QuoteOf course this is just my opinion. But CO female rape victims really should avoid being going to a Catholic Hospitals after they have been raped. Unless of course they too believe in "Life at all Cost". Then in that case, well I guess they should be happy that God meant for them to be raped and gone through their own personal hell because God obviously wanted this to happen. Nice guy isn't he?
![]()
This is a convoluted thought process at best![]()
The bible is fiction. Deal with it.
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Shotgun 1
QuoteGod (If you believe in him) gives and takes life.
Ok, then any doctor who adheres to that should also not do anything to help a woman get pregnant if she is having trouble conceiving. That too would be interfering with God's job. And then technically they shouldn't do anything to help someone who is dying either because that was obviously God's plan as well.
sinker 0
perhaps your BIGGEST flaw in what you just posted is that God would WILL someone to get raped. That is just sick and twisted! God would never will that. He allows it, unfortunately, b/c He is a God who gave free will. That way, men and women could CHOOSE to return to Him His gift of life and love. But, inherent in that gift of choice is the possibility that someone can CHOOSE to do wrong. That is most unfortunate, and in the case of rape, devestatingly tragic.
It's up to us to work to create a better society where people don't even think of raping others. It's up to us to do all we can to help those who have been raped.
Don't blame God b/c bad things happen to people. But you better believe that He sure can turn bad things into good.
-the artist formerly known as sinker
sinker 0
the general belief is that it is better to exist than to not, and that is why it is not a violation of the Hipocratic Oath to assist medically w/ child conception. As far as where death is concerned, it's natural to die and unnatural to go through constant, extreme measures to be kep alive. It's just as unnatural to withhold basic life sustaining treatment b/c one's quality of life isn't what you think it should be. (oh lord, here we go again...


-the artist formerly known as sinker
Quote
The key here is what is relavant to you. You want the doctors or hopital to comform to your beliefs!!!!!
If the won't, because they disagree, you would make a law and force them.
Simple isn't it?
Relavent to me? My belief is that a doctor should do his job, regardless of his religion. Withholding information is not doing his job.
When a doctor withholds information about treatment options from a patient because of his religion, he is fucking with other people's lives. In that case the doctor is essentially forcing his beliefs on that patient.
If he won't provide a patient with information about all their options (even if they won't provide the options or treatment) he needs to find another job.
Quotedude, you've got some SERIOUS issues w/ God and religion.
It's called being agnostic. The universe, a possible creator and how we came to be is beyond my comprehension. But rest assured, there is no way in hell (pardon the pun) that I'm going to believe some ficticious book written and translated eons ago by humans as the truth. If someone attempted to introduce the bible in today's world they would be laughed at and likely thrown in a mental institution.
The bible is fiction, deal with it.

Try not to worry about the things you have no control over
wmw999 2,589
For instance -- getting platelet transfusions in the case of some childhood cancers. There are other treatments. Is it OK to withold from the parents the option of platelet transfusions (i.e. don't even tell them that it exists, and is something that some other hospital can do?)
Wendy W.
sinker 0
-the artist formerly known as sinker
QuoteWould we consider it to be unethical for a Jehovah's Witness doctor or facility to withold information about blood transfusion?
I believe it is unethical to withhold information from a patient because of one's religious beliefs. That would be putting one's religious beliefs ahead of the welfare/health of the patient, which doctors shouldn't do.
Quote
For instance -- getting platelet transfusions in the case of some childhood cancers. There are other treatments. Is it OK to withold from the parents the option of platelet transfusions?
Wendy W.
I wouldn't think so.
I don't have any problem with a doctor/hospital refusing to provide a treatment with which they do not agree.
I have a problem with a doctor withholding information about treatments they don't agree with because of their own religious beliefs.
Shotgun 1
Quoteshotgun, do you believe it is better to exist than to not exist?
My response to Ron was just to show that what is said in the oath can be taken in different ways.
But to answer your question... I don't know what it's like to not exist... So I can't actually answer your question.

wmw999 2,589
I'll go fix it.
Wendy
sinker 0
QuoteWould we consider it to be unethical for a Jehovah's Witness doctor or facility to withold information about blood transfusion?
For instance -- getting platelet transfusions in the case of some childhood cancers. There are other treatments. Is it OK to withold from the parents the option of platelet transfusions?
Wendy W.
yeah, i'd say it was about as equally unethical to withhold information on such treatments. i think in your scenario, Wendy, a J.W. doc simply stating that there are other options that were not available at the J.H. facility would be honorable.
-the artist formerly known as sinker
OK...But "Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death...it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God"
???? God (If you believe in him) gives and takes life. This section of the oath does not say anything about keeping secrets.
No offense but that is a weak argument.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites