0
ChasingBlueSky

Supreme Court: No death penalty for kids

Recommended Posts

Quote


"A majority of States have rejected the imposition of the death penalty on juvenile offenders under 18, and we now hold this is required by the Eighth Amendment.", Majority opinion, SCUS, 2005.

For your reference:

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

QED



I wonder how many defenders of the 2nd Amendment feel it is ok to interpret this one however they want? It seems it would only strengthen your argument against gun control by fully supporting all of the Amendments as written.
_________________________________________
you can burn the land and boil the sea, but you can't take the sky from me....
I WILL fly again.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Blue states are more likley to allow criminals to go free and prey on others...Who would have thought?



The reason they stopped the death penalty in IL was finding people on death row that were innocent.
_________________________________________
you can burn the land and boil the sea, but you can't take the sky from me....
I WILL fly again.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Blue states are more likley to allow criminals to go free and prey on others...Who would have thought?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The reason they stopped the death penalty in IL was finding people on death row that were innocent.



I can go to an abortion clinic in a blue state and show you the remains of several innocent people put to death.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The reason they stopped the death penalty in IL was finding people on death row that were innocent.



I can go to an abortion clinic in a blue state and show you the remains of several innocent people put to death.



Seems to me the topic of "when does life start" is always up for debate. Both sides have good arguments.

Guilty or not guilty is very easy to decide and only gets blurred when corruption occurs.

Can't solve both issues at once. Might as well complete the one that is clearly black and white so you can better concentrate on the grey area.
_________________________________________
you can burn the land and boil the sea, but you can't take the sky from me....
I WILL fly again.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Life in Prison is punishment, not someone's happy place, and not rehab



Yes, it is about punishment and removing the luxury of a free life for your crimes. However, it needs to include rehab or you just introduce ex-cons back into the populace with almost no options other than more crime.

I know some people that beat the system. They did their time and changed their lives. These people are stronger parts to the community than alot of other people I know.
_________________________________________
you can burn the land and boil the sea, but you can't take the sky from me....
I WILL fly again.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

However, it needs to include rehab or you just introduce ex-cons back into the populace with almost no options other than more crime.



I thought we were talking about lifers... no reintroduction to society, no need for rehab...

You still didn't answer which parts of my suggested treatment were abuse... maybe its because none of them are, and that people who have commited no crimes live free lives with less.

J
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. - Edmund Burke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


You still didn't answer which parts of my suggested treatment were abuse... maybe its because none of them are, and that people who have commited no crimes live free lives with less.

J



eh? I agreed with you as long as civil rights were not violated. Maybe you were thinking about another reply to your post?
_________________________________________
you can burn the land and boil the sea, but you can't take the sky from me....
I WILL fly again.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I wonder how many defenders of the 2nd Amendment feel it is ok to interpret this one however they want?



What defines "Cruel and Unusual" is quite subjective... at the time those words were written executions would not be considered such, and 16 and 17 year olds were on the back side of middle aged... It is our society's standards that should drive the modern definition, not ones from overseas...

The court has taken away the ability to look at each individual case to see if the murderer in question was mature or not... instead they have said, perhaps not intentionally, that no one is mature until the age of 18.

There are not words in the operative portion of the 2nd Amendment that are so open to subjective interpretation... "the people" would be the closest phrase, but to go down that road endangers the meaning of several other Amendments.

J
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. - Edmund Burke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Can't solve both issues at once. Might as well complete the one that is clearly black and white so you can better concentrate on the grey area.



See for me, given the choice of killing murderers that are found guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt, or killing unborn innocent children.

I'll go with killing the bad guys.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

at the time those words were written.....What defines "Cruel and Unusual" is quite subjective



These are two of the major excuses gun control indivduals use for the 2nd. By using it towards the 8th you are only giving them credibility.
_________________________________________
you can burn the land and boil the sea, but you can't take the sky from me....
I WILL fly again.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Can't solve both issues at once. Might as well complete the one that is clearly black and white so you can better concentrate on the grey area.



See for me, given the choice of killing murderers that are found guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt, or killing unborn innocent children.

I'll go with killing the bad guys.



But as it turns out there is plenty of corruption and some of those on death row don't deserve to be there. You are ok with them getting the needle as well?
_________________________________________
you can burn the land and boil the sea, but you can't take the sky from me....
I WILL fly again.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

That is one of the major excuses gun control indivduals use for the 2nd. By using it towards the 8th you are only giving them credibility.



No, I am not saying the 8th Amendment does not have relevance today because times are different... which is what gun grabbers tend to say...

I am saying that what is considered creul and unusal, a very subjective phrase, may change as society does... but it should be the people who define it, not the courts.

Quote

cru·el ( P ) Pronunciation Key (krl)
adj. cru·el·er, or cru·el·ler cru·el·est or cru·el·lest
Disposed to inflict pain or suffering.
Causing suffering; painful.

un·u·su·al ( P ) Pronunciation Key (n-yzh-l)
adj.
Not usual, common, or ordinary.



To use that arguement against the 2nd would be to say that "Arms" was a subjective term, where it clearly is not.

Quote

arm2 ( P ) Pronunciation Key (ärm)
n.
A weapon, especially a firearm



J
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. - Edmund Burke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I wonder how many defenders of the 2nd Amendment feel it is ok to interpret this one however they want?



What defines "Cruel and Unusual" is quite subjective... at the time those words were written executions would not be considered such, and 16 and 17 year olds were on the back side of middle aged... It is our society's standards that should drive the modern definition, not ones from overseas...

The court has taken away the ability to look at each individual case to see if the murderer in question was mature or not... instead they have said, perhaps not intentionally, that no one is mature until the age of 18.



J



The law already makes that statement, with respect to a number of activities. Indeed, the law considers a child not mature enough to consume alcohol until 21. Individual cases are NOT considered on their merits.

Anyhow, the SCUS trumps all your arguments, and mine too.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


But as it turns out there is plenty of corruption and some of those on death row don't deserve to be there. You are ok with them getting the needle as well?



Here read what I wrote again...If you have further questions ask.



Quote

See for me, given the choice of killing murderers that are found guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt, or killing unborn innocent children.

I'll go with killing the bad guys.


"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


But as it turns out there is plenty of corruption and some of those on death row don't deserve to be there. You are ok with them getting the needle as well?



Here read what I wrote again...If you have further questions ask.



Quote

See for me, given the choice of killing murderers that are found guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt, or killing unborn innocent children.

I'll go with killing the bad guys.



Well, define "shadow of a doubt" and a discussion can begin. Ever study quantum mechanics?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>To use that arguement against the 2nd would be to say that "Arms"
>was a subjective term, where it clearly is not.

I think the parallel argument would be that the second amendment should be read in its entirety and taken literally; that is, that the second amendment applies to arming militias.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

But as it turns out there is plenty of corruption and some of those on death row don't deserve to be there



"plenty of", "some of those" - well, I'm convinced.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

But as it turns out there is plenty of corruption and some of those on death row don't deserve to be there



"plenty of", "some of those" - well, I'm convinced.



It was enough to convince our former Gov to change his mind after a few innocent people were released from death row. So much for shadow of a doubt.
_________________________________________
you can burn the land and boil the sea, but you can't take the sky from me....
I WILL fly again.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Indeed, the law considers a child not mature enough to consume alcohol until 21.



But one is an adult at the age of 18 by all other laws but the drinking age... you can vote (an activity requiring more maturity than drinking), sign contracts, enlist in the military, register for the selective service, etc...

21 is actually not the federal law, it was a threat by the DoT to withhold highway funds that forced the majority of the states to adopt it... you can drink at 18 on some Military bases (Ft. Huachua for example)... but that is another discussion.

And now, not by law, but by court decision, maturity starts at 18...

But maybe girls who are younger than 18 are mature enough to get abortions without their parents knowing:S

J
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. - Edmund Burke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[reply}It was enough to convince our former Gov to change his mind after a few innocent people were released from death row. So much for shadow of a doubt.



Was he one of the corrupt ones or a good guy? - I don't have a program here.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I think the parallel argument would be that the second amendment should be read in its entirety and taken literally; that is, that the second amendment applies to arming militias.



I disagree... I can read the 2nd in its entirety and see that the second clause is not dependent on the first... it really is basic English...

If you look at the terms used, and define them, you have one amendment, the 2nd, that has a fairly objective term, Arms, and another, the 8th, with very subjective ones, Creul and Unusual...

Put 10 people in a room and ask them to write down what an Arm is... you will get some reasonable level of continuity in their answers... Put 10 people in a room and ask them to write down what Cruel and Unusal is, you will not get the same...

J
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. - Edmund Burke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

[reply}It was enough to convince our former Gov to change his mind after a few innocent people were released from death row. So much for shadow of a doubt.



Was he one of the corrupt ones or a good guy? - I don't have a program here.



Honestly? Yes to both. You may know him from the 9/11 commision on the Repub side.

He was a possible bad guy in "CDL for brides" scandal, but was rumored to get nominated for a Nobel due to his change of stance on the death penalty.
_________________________________________
you can burn the land and boil the sea, but you can't take the sky from me....
I WILL fly again.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Well, define "shadow of a doubt" and a discussion can begin



DNA evidence, eyewitness's, them admitting it.

Quote

Ever study quantum mechanics?



No, but I got "A's" on my Algebra I and II classes
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0