0
PhillyKev

I will now point out two good things that Bush did....

Recommended Posts

...don't worry, it's a little back handed. ;)

The first is, that he had the rules rewritten regarding torture of prisoners to be more restrictive than just stopping short of causing death or organ failure. And also to remove his ability to override those restrictions personally. This is a good thing, but it's a little disgusting that it took him this long to do it, and it smacks me as a CYA move. But, it is something good that he did.

The other is that he tried to put through new import restrictions on textiles from China to support textile manufacturers in the US. Unfortunately, retailer lobbies took it to court and had it overturned in federal court. So the existing restriction that expire today will now be replaced by nothing and the market is about to be flooded with cheap Chinese import textiles. At least he made an attempt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

:oNext thing you know,Kallend will be saying something nice about him:o:D:P



Kallend can't - he's banned.



Holy crap! Really? Geez, you stop paying attention for a week, and this is what happens...
It's a temporary ban, right?

you've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel loquacious?' -- well do you, punk?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, um, I didn't get that banning offense. I don't want to rehash it, but I read it as him saying someone had stuck his foot in his mouth. Is that a bad thing?

Oh well, on with the festivities.

you've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel loquacious?' -- well do you, punk?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

It's a temporary ban, right?



I understand that some want it to be permanent. I'm not sure if it's toes, or piggies that are the offended party.



Some of the folks in SC has been quite for a while:)

Not to worry they'll be back[:/]
R.I.P.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Question: I've lurked here for awhile, post from time to time but I really do want to understand this "banning" stuff.

So in basic: If you attack some one who is a MEMBER than a greenie can BAN you for a) A period of time depending how BAD the attack is. b) Forever

How about if I attack Kallend now?? :P he's kinda in limbo right?? I've tried to get him in the past but he's to damn smart for me. (hell he's been in school his entire life...I just went to the eighth grade)

Having read what was said, it seems as if the prof has done a lot worse in the past.


FREE KALLAND

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

...don't worry, it's a little back handed. ;)

The first is, that he had the rules rewritten regarding torture of prisoners to be more restrictive than just stopping short of causing death or organ failure. And also to remove his ability to override those restrictions personally. This is a good thing, but it's a little disgusting that it took him this long to do it, and it smacks me as a CYA move. But, it is something good that he did.

The other is that he tried to put through new import restrictions on textiles from China to support textile manufacturers in the US. Unfortunately, retailer lobbies took it to court and had it overturned in federal court. So the existing restriction that expire today will now be replaced by nothing and the market is about to be flooded with cheap Chinese import textiles. At least he made an attempt.



Hey you forgott to mention the most important thing GWB did. He ran again and against the odds
got re-elected. to any decent European thats IMPORTANT.


God bless Bush
God bless the USofA



God bless Kelland
(please note the space entre Kelland and Bush the further apart the better)

Gone fishing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I would say that some other posters have behaved much, much worse in the past (and in the present) and got away with just a warning.

I don´t know, maybe there has been private PM going on that only the greenies know about.



John's had real personal attacks blown off, where this was actually funny and pretty light. Maybe it's a cumulative thing...

Or maybe the greenies are just plain tired of the constant tone here lately and the bar is being raised. I can see a lot of people getting a 'break' in that case.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I would say that some other posters have behaved much, much worse in the past (and in the present) and got away with just a warning.

I don´t know, maybe there has been private PM going on that only the greenies know about.



John's had real personal attacks blown off, where this was actually funny and pretty light. Maybe it's a cumulative thing...

Or maybe the greenies are just plain tired of the constant tone here lately and the bar is being raised. I can see a lot of people getting a 'break' in that case.



In just the last week I've read in SC direct accusations of libel, plagiarism and lying, with no repercussions.

SAVE KALLAND

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
p - I hopped over to the locked thread to see what's up. Apparently the greenies are intending to curb the recent tone. Good for them. If you see something you think is an attack:

See if you are personally biased against that person or subject. if not, send a note to a greenie

if so, look at it again in light of your own bias. then send a note anyway or not after that review

It a real action you can take and much more constructive than just griping. But much less fun. I really do think these guys mean well.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I understand that some want it to be permanent. I'm not sure if it's toes, or piggies that are the offended party.



For the record I sent a PM to a MOD. I asked him not to ban John. The reply was basicly that they have a list of folks that have been pushing the edge so long that they are close to being kicked out of SC forever. John was on that list, and they are sick of the hidden attacks.

They are holding peoples history's against them.

Funny thing is they as of yet do not have a way to track a ban after it has expired, so they are going on feeling, not fact.

A way to track the reason for a ban, and who banned them would be a great step in checking to see if a MOD is showing a bias.

I have been told this has been discussed.

Also, John is not the first person to get hit with this, I think Peaceful J was.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0