akarunway 1 #1 December 30, 2004 Clarke to defend Saddam Wednesday 29 December 2004, 20:36 Makka Time, 17:36 GMT Ramsey Clark said Washington should also be put on trial Former US attorney-general Ramsey Clark is to join Saddam Hussein's defence team, a spokesman for the ousted Iraqi president's lawyers says. Edit to add: there are decent lawyers out there but Me thinks they are the minority Ziad Khasawna said on Wednesday that Clark, who held the office of attorney-general under US president Lyndon Johnson, had "honoured and inspired" the legal team by agreeing to help defend Saddam. The former top US justice official, who arrived on Tuesday in Jordan where the defence team is based, has become known as a left-wing lawyer and firm critic of US foreign policy since leaving office. He visited Saddam in Baghdad in February 2003 just before the US-lead invasion and has also been involved with the defence of former Yugoslav leader Slobodan Milosevic, on trial for war crimes at a UN court in The Hague. Clark comment Clark said in the Jordanian capital Amman that his principle concern was protecting the former president's rights, who only saw a lawyer for the first time this month - a year after his capture. "In international law, anyone accused of crime has the right to be tried by a confident, independent and impartial court, and there can be no fair trail without those qualities," he said. "The special court in Iraq was created by the Iraqi governing council, which is nothing more than a creation of the US military occupation and has no authority in law as a criminal court," he said. The Iraq Special Tribunal was established by the US-led administration in Iraq last December to try members of the former government. Clark also said the US itself must be tried for the November assault on Falluja, destruction of houses, torture in prisons and its role in the deaths of thousands of Iraqis in the war. FUCKIN LAWYERS. I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrunkMonkey 0 #2 December 30, 2004 I loathe SH as much as the next American, but I do agree with the following: Quote"...anyone accused of crime has the right to be tried by a confident, independent and impartial court, and there can be no fair trail without those qualities," Very true. To deny SH competent trial counsel is to subvert our own justice system.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nightingale 0 #3 December 30, 2004 Give Hussein the best damn council we can come up with. Because if (when?) he's convicted, it won't be overturned because of incompetent council. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jib 0 #4 December 30, 2004 A lawyer who is doing something for the wrong reasons may not be the best choice. -------------------------------------------------- the depth of his depravity sickens me. -- Jerry Falwell, People v. Larry Flynt Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #5 December 30, 2004 Did the same thing in Nuremburg. Give the accused good council so there's no suspicion of a rigged trial. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
