kallend 2,144 #1 December 20, 2004 If a is an element in set A, and the statement is made that "Members of A possess the attribute P", then that implies that a has attribute P. Think about that when making statements like "Airline pilots are incompetent lazy boobs".... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #2 December 20, 2004 But then how do you go about circumventing the personal attacks rule in order to be as offensive, rude, and obnoxious as possible? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,144 #3 December 20, 2004 QuoteBut then how do you go about circumventing the personal attacks rule in order to be as offensive, rude, and obnoxious as possible? I suspect the answer involves midgets and porn.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,577 #4 December 20, 2004 QuoteAirline pilots are incompetent lazy boobs But only some airline pilots have boobs (women, and fat men). Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheAnvil 0 #5 December 20, 2004 Some chicks call my pecs 'moobs' or 'man boobs' for some odd reason. Vinny the Anvil Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL JACKASS POWER!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
slug 1 #6 December 20, 2004 QuoteBut then how do you go about circumventing the personal attacks rule in order to be as offensive, rude, and obnoxious as possible? So there is humor in SC Come on Guy's and Gal's it's the holidays loosen up show us what you gotR.I.P. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ad151 0 #7 December 20, 2004 QuoteQuoteBut then how do you go about circumventing the personal attacks rule in order to be as offensive, rude, and obnoxious as possible? I suspect the answer involves midgets and porn. bwahahahah the prof has some humor afterall! happy holidays! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #8 December 21, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuoteBut then how do you go about circumventing the personal attacks rule in order to be as offensive, rude, and obnoxious as possible? I suspect the answer involves midgets and porn. bwahahahah the prof has some humor afterall! happy holidays! That wasn't humor - it was simply observational skillz.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #9 December 21, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteBut then how do you go about circumventing the personal attacks rule in order to be as offensive, rude, and obnoxious as possible? I suspect the answer involves midgets and porn. bwahahahah the prof has some humor afterall! happy holidays! That wasn't humor - it was simply observational skillz. And this post was definitely not humor... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #10 December 21, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteBut then how do you go about circumventing the personal attacks rule in order to be as offensive, rude, and obnoxious as possible? I suspect the answer involves midgets and porn. bwahahahah the prof has some humor afterall! happy holidays! That wasn't humor - it was simply observational skillz. And this post was definitely not humor... You need to lighten up PK -I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kjarv 0 #11 December 22, 2004 If a is an element in set A, and the statement is made that "Members of A possess the attribute P", then that implies that a has attribute P. ========== I hear the old voice of my symbolic logic teacher haunting me... I think you'd have to say "ALL members of A possess attribute P" in order to imply that a has attribute P But, I'm just saying that to feel better about having had to take that symbolic logic class Please don't make me do a proof by induction Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
