0
jcd11235

Have we become what we fear?

Recommended Posts

Quote

see you don't like my question so I'll answer: NO WAR HAS EVER PRODUCED NO CIVILIAN CASUALTIES.



I think you worded that poorly. NO WAR produces NO CASUALTIES. What you meant was that there hasn't been a war that hasn't produced casualties. Big difference there. And leads to a simple conclusion. If you want to avoid casualties, avoid war. Don't seek it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I think he meant you should spend more time on the news that HE likes...you know, FOX, Drudge, Newsmax.



As opposed to the news you like? CBS?
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I think he meant you should spend more time on the news that HE likes...you know, FOX, Drudge, Newsmax.



As opposed to the news you like? CBS?



Please point to one link to a CBS news article that I've posted. Vinny is well knows for the posting links to the sources I stated, as well as Ann Coulter articles. I couldn't even tell you what channel CBS is on tv here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have heard the right deny truth to the accusations, but have not seen any supporting evidence. I am trying to understand why this stuff is not making mainstream media. If there are valid reasons, great. Inform us. I started this thread to establish a Socratic dialog.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You wonder why Palestinian gunmen aren't referred to as soldiers? Give me a break. Perhaps because soldiers don't break into compounds at night a kill children and terrorists do? Or perhaps because soldiers don't go into cafes and blow themselves and closeby women/children/innocents to smithereens? Could either of those be reasons?


Check out http://ifamericansknew.org
Quote

Because their use violates the Geneva Convention on Human Rights.



Quote

We did give Saddam Hussein WMDs in the '80's. There was this minor[sic] incident with our embassy in Iran, this minor[sic] spat known as the Cold War, and a few other foreign policy things going on at the time that served as an impetus for the gift. Cookie cutters are for baking, not foreign policy.


We also installed the Baath Party. Two (or more) wrongs do not make a right.
Quote

To what persecution of Muslims are you referring? Raiding the offices of losers sending funds to Hezbollah under the guise of charity? Whatever. Think that's persecution if it makes you feel better.


You can't seriously believe that Muslims are allowed to practice their faith without living in fear to some degree? While it may not be unversal, there is widespread predjudices against Muslims in this country.

Quote

The press not living up to it's responsibilities? I'll agree with you there. By leaning so far to the left CNN et al really do the country a disservice.


Tha fallicy of a liberal media is such a joke, one almost as funny as calling Kerry a liberal, which he was only when compared to extreme right winger Shrub. You did follow the primaries, right?
Quote

You got a problem with criminals being in jail? That's your problem - deal with it.


I have a problem with jailing people for victimless crimes. That is not something that happens in free countries.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

They were arrested and held for two hours....They did not go to Jail.

They will either go to trial, or the charges will be dropped.

And last I checked, Bush didn't order these guys to be arrested.


You obviously didn't read the site closely, or read the FBI memo regarding protestors.
Quote

Well gee, protesters where moved? So what? They moved all of them, or maybe they only moved the ones causing a problem? Most pro-anybody folks are not going to start a problem, a few anti-somebody folks will.


They made for poor photo opputunities for Shrub. To have peaceful protestors removed before they might possibly cause a problem is, well, certainly in keeping with fascism, so you made my point. Thanks.

Quote

Yeah, Israeli soldiers don't strap exposives on and go try and kill people just ridding a bus. They are uniformed soldiers, not people wearing civi clothes and targeting civilians on a bus.


Is there really a difference between carying a bomb into a building and dropping it from a plane, except one takes a helluva lot more soldier courage. I will not hold against them the lack of funds for uniforms. They can't afford fancy warplanes, either.

Quote

No, because it is dense enough to work really well against armor.


Tungsten is more dense than uranium.
Quote

Oh so you have no proof, but are pissed anyway?


Yeah, I'm pissed. I'm not ready to dismiss free elections as useless, just yet. You are?
Quote


Thats not the governments fault....But what do you expect when the left slams Fox, but rallies behind CBS when they bring forged documents and then forgives them?


I don't remember defending CBS. In fact, I believe their were some not so nice things said about them in one of my links, which you evidently did not take time to read, beacause if you had, you would have read the case that Fox News won, legally allowing them to distort the truth to the point of mistruth.


Quote


Saddam had 12 years, and while he might have not had any WMD's he NEVER complied with the resolutions...According to the resolutions he HAD TO TELL AND SHOW US WHAT HE DID WITH THE WMD's.

He never did comply.


So, he didn't have them. Why did we change the mission when we found that out? Why wasn't Shrub honest with Americans and say "I screwed up?"
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I know I generalized terribly in my last post. For that I am sorry.

........but, debating your post gives validity to your assertions. (namely the unAmerican comment)

If that label was placed to another by a group then let the debate begin. I do not think that is what happened. Those wanting to debate other topics placed that label on themselves and blamed the other to gain political advantage........so I don't buy it.

I also do not agree with anything else you posts as being valid.

Personally, I do not understand where that kind of thinking comes from. You, ( and I am not presuming to know what you think) may not understand how I can not see your pointUnsure

Want to talk it over? Great, but is will not happen with me. Not because your opinion doesn't count or should not be debated, but because I can not even come close to accepting your starting point.


I cannotcome close to agreeing with Shrub's political ideas, but I will debate them, because that is what responsible citizens do in a free country. That is how we overcome differences.

Bring on the Socratic dialog. ;)
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You obviously didn't read the site closely, or read the FBI memo regarding protestors.



I try not to spend to much time on such lopsided sights. I don't read Boortz's or Rush's web site either.

But you seem to confuse being arrested with going to jail.

See in the country we live in you can be arreasted for doing something. Then you get to go to court. If it was justified then you go to jail, if not then it either never gets to court or it gets thrown out. This case never went to court.

Also, if you cause a ruckus...Expect someone to notice. If you act like a jackass...(And being mostly naked building a pryamid on the route that the Prez is on counts as acting like a jackass.) Expect someone to care.

Quote

They made for poor photo opputunities for Shrub. To have peaceful protestors removed before they might possibly cause a problem is, well, certainly in keeping with fascism, so you made my point. Thanks.



No if we were facist they would have "dissapeared".

Quote

Is there really a difference between carying a bomb into a building and dropping it from a plane, except one takes a helluva lot more soldier courage. I will not hold against them the lack of funds for uniforms. They can't afford fancy warplanes, either.



Yeah one targets militants, and the other targets little Jonny and his Mom in the cafe.

Quote

Yeah, I'm pissed. I'm not ready to dismiss free elections as useless, just yet. You are?



You are pissed and making claims with no proof....That makes it just noise.

Quote

So, he didn't have them.



So what, he didn't COMPLY. If he did then nothing would have happened.

With your constant "Shrub" BS Im done with you.

Feel free to idealise the terrorists that kill innocent women and children BY PLAN if you like.

Feel free to claim you are being held down by the man.

If you were held down by the man and talked like you do, you would be dead by now.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

See in the country we live in you can be arreasted for doing something. Then you get to go to court. If it was justified then you go to jail, if not then it either never gets to court or it gets thrown out. This case never went to court.


And you don't understand why that is bad? Repressing peaceful public assembly, which is protected by from government interference by the first Amemndment, so that Shrub looks better on television is not something a leader of a free country should do.

Quote

See in the country we live in you can be arreasted for doing something. Then you get to go to court. If it was justified then you go to jail, if not then it either never gets to court or it gets thrown out. This case never went to court.


You seem to be under the impression that there is a single way for fascism to exist, and any variation changes it. to something better. This is not the case, as you have known if you had read the Counterpunch article to which I posted a link at the beginning of this thread. Try reading it before you tell me what fascism isn't, please.
Quote

Yeah one targets militants, and the other targets little Jonny and his Mom in the cafe.


The other one destroys Johnny and Mommy's home. Yeah, that's much better. BTW, far more palastinian civilians die at the hands of the Israelis than vice versa, so your argument is completely in valid.

Quote

You are pissed and making claims with no proof....That makes it just noise.

But, you see, there IS a LOT of evidence of fraud, and many republican election officials are dragging their feet for the investigation.

Feel free to bring some facts to the discussion, Ron.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

And you don't understand why that is bad? Repressing peaceful public assembly



One could argue that it was not peaceful .They did it to cause a disturbance....A disturbance was delt with.

They were not jailed, they were not killed.

Quote

Try reading it before you tell me what fascism



As soon as you recognize that this is not it, I'll read some liberal slanted website.

Quote

The other one destroys Johnny and Mommy's home. Yeah, that's much better.



Lets see one kills little Jonny and Mom BY PLAN, and the other its an accident.

Yeah, there is a BIG difference there.

Quote

BTW, far more palastinian civilians die at the hands of the Israelis than vice versa, so your argument is completely in valid.



You seem to ignore "INTENT" all the time.

Quote

Feel free to bring some facts to the discussion, Ron.



Im not going to bother with this since you can't seem to get over the election and the "shrub" comments.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I cannotcome close to agreeing with Shrub's political ideas, but I will debate them, because that is what responsible citizens do in a free country. That is how we overcome differences.

Bring on the Socratic dialog. ;)



Here we agree:)
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

One could argue that it was not peaceful .They did it to cause a disturbance....A disturbance was delt with.



...in a manner completely inconsistant with the first amendment.

Quote

As soon as you recognize that this is not it, I'll read some liberal slanted website.


Except that all the EVIDENCE idicates that this may very well be a form a fascism. Like I said, read up on fascism before you tell us what its not. In fairness, I guess it is possible that you shot at some fascists once, so that makes you an expert.



Quote

Lets see one kills little Jonny and Mom BY PLAN, and the other its an accident.


Accident by whose standards? There is no real difference.
Quote


You seem to ignore "INTENT" all the time.


So, the Israelis keep "accidenatally " killing the Palestinians, over and over and over and over....
Quote

Im not going to bother with this since you can't seem to get over the election and the "shrub" comments.


Have a nice day then. :)
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

So what, he didn't COMPLY. If he did then nothing would have happened.



Please take the time to be informed, especially before you vote. He was complying, albeit a little more slowly than Shrub's impatience would stand for.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_Security_Council_Resolution_1441
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml%3Fi=20021028&s=zunes
http://www.commondreams.org/views02/1114-03.htm
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Please take the time to be informed, especially before you vote. He was complying, albeit a little more slowly than Shrub's impatience would stand for.



12 years.

He didn't comply for 12 years.

And several others agreed.

Quote

W"e know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country" --Gore, September 23,2003

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."--Sandy Berger, Feb 18, 1998.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime...now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued decit and his consistant grasp for weapons of mass destruction...So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real" --John F. Kerry, Jan 23, 2003.



In 1995 the UN Special Commision (UNSCOM) led by Duelfer found otherwise:

Quote

In early August, Saddam's son-in-law Hussein Kamel had defected to Jordan, and had then spoken publicly about Iraq's offensive biological, chemical, and nuclear capabilities. (Kamel later returned to Iraq and was killed almost immediately, on his father-in-law's orders.) The regime's credibility was badly damaged by Kamel's revelations, and during these meetings the Iraqi representatives decided to tell Duelfer and his team more than they had ever revealed before. "This was the first time Iraq actually agreed to discuss the Presidential origins of these programs," Duelfer recalled. Among the most startling admissions made by the Iraqi scientists was that they had weaponized the biological agent aflatoxin.



OK so that was 4 years after the ban.

This does not seem like complying to me:
Quote

Duelfer told me, "We kept pressing the Iraqis to discuss the concept of use for aflatoxin. We learned that the origin of the biological-weapons program is in the security services, not in the military—meaning that it really came out of the assassinations program." The Iraqis, Duelfer said, admitted something else: they had loaded aflatoxin into two Scud-ready warheads, and also mixed aflatoxin with tear gas. They wouldn't say why



Also Saddam maneuvered UNSCOM out of his country in 1998, weapons inspectors had found a sizable portion of his arsenal but were vexed by what they couldn't find. It was his job to show what he did...But he booted the inspectors out.

Kicking them out is not compling either.

He had 12 years to comply...And that mean telling us where and what he did with them.

He insted made new agents.

May I sugest you stop trying to teach me and study some first?
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Muslims not free to practice their faith in America? Ha! Untenable. Outlandish. Utterly false.

Kerry NOT a liberal? HE IS LEFT OF TED KENNEDY BY HIS OWN VOTING RECORD!!!!!

NO LIBERAL MEDIA??? I hope you mean that as a joke. I really do.

For PK: I only read Drudge articles posted here; don't care to peruse his website as a general rule of thumb. And I read Newsmax only occasionally. Fox and left-wing CNN are my two primary news sources.
:S
Vinny the Anvil
Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL
JACKASS POWER!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Kicking them out is not compling either.



No, but readmitting them is.

To say nothing of the hypocrisy of allowing Israel to violate UN resolutions more extensively than any other country.

We had no international or legal authoruty to invade Iraq., and any claims that we did are unfounded spin on the part of Shrub.

Do you have any idea what kind of shape the world would be in if evry leader with an army at his/her disposal started recklessly invading countries they didn't like?

Quote

May I sugest you stop trying to teach me and study some first?


ROFLMFAO

You accuse me of needing to study up on things? There's no hypocrisy there *sarcasm*
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Fox and left-wing CNN are my two primary news sources.



That is a very limited variety of sources. Fox is not even credible. And if you think that CNN is left-wing, that explains why you think Kerry was liberal. I bet you also believe the world is a safer place, now that Shrub has declared war on terror.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not a good variety, eh? I think not. If you DON'T think CNN leans left then you haven't been watching it very closely.

Kerry not a liberal - you're still on that kick. Think that if it makes you feel better. Ignore any facts you like if it makes you feel better. Facts are such stubborn things...try as one might, ignoring them does not change them.
:S
Vinny the Anvil
Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL
JACKASS POWER!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

You seem to be hearing what you want to hear from the news then taking selected tidbits from it to make what you hear conform to what you believe.
:S



Funny thing about something as subjective as that - you could say the same thing about you.





Ummm....Bo...You could say that about everybody...But, truly looking at an issue or debate from both sides is virtually unheard of these days...for some reason...there are only two sides to every story and "somebody" seems to always choose only one...


~R+R:)...Vinny, good debate...enjoyed reading your responses, and I know you are well versed in politics and the news...B|...
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Fly the friendly skies...^_^...})ii({...^_~...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Ignore any facts you like if it makes you feel better. Facts are such stubborn things...try as one might, ignoring them does not change them.



I cannot ignore what you don't present. Claiming supporting evidence exists does not make it so. Show me.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

No, but readmitting them is.



After threat of war.

Even after they were back they were playing cat and mouse games with the inspectors...All the time NEVER complying by saying what he did with any of it.

Quote

To say nothing of the hypocrisy of allowing Israel to violate UN resolutions more extensively than any other country.



Thats an issue with the UN, not the US.

Quote

We had no international or legal authoruty to invade Iraq., and any claims that we did are unfounded spin on the part of Shrub.



You have not read much. The UN voted on it. Any spin otherwise is liberal slant.

You going to mention what Secretary-General Kofi Annan says? Well he might need to look at his organization a little better since he was helping to fund Saddam.

Quote

Tim Russert asked why only a portion of the documentation requested of the U.N. by the U.S. General Accounting Office had been turned over, Mr. Annan protested: "We are open. We are transparent."

That sounded lame enough, coming just after Mr. Russert on national TV had flourished in front of Mr. Annan a letter sent by Mr. Annan's own Secretariat on April 14, advising one of the pivotal Oil for Food contractors, Saybolt International--which oversaw Saddam's oil exports--to keep quiet

Now investigators for the House International Relations Committee have dug up a second hush letter, this one dated April 2, sent by the U.N. to yet another crucial Oil for Food contractor: Cotecna Inspections. This is the company that for the last five years of the seven-year program held the U.N. contract for the sensitive job of authenticating all goods being shipped into Iraq under Oil for Food--and was recommended last October by Oil for Food's executive director, Benon Sevan, for the work it is still doing in Iraq for the Coalition Provisional Authority. (Cotecna is also the company that for the better part of three years before winning its slot in the Oil for Food program, in December, 1998, employed Mr. Annan's son, Kojo Annan, first on staff and then as a consultant, a potential conflict of interest that the U.N. did not declare.)
...
The letter to Cotecna was a pointed reminder of terms of the U.N. contracts with Cotecna, detailing that all documentation connected with Oil for Food "shall be the property of the United Nations, shall be treated as confidential and shall be delivered only to the United Nations authorized officials on completion of work under this contract."

In the letter to Saybolt, dated 12 days later, the message had become tougher and yet more detailed, telling the company that any requests for information not already public should be relayed to the U.N., including "the reason why it is being sought." The letter to Saybolt also made specific mention that if U.N. internal audit reports are asked for, "we would not agree to their release." These would be the same internal audits that the U.N. Secretariat--which administered the Oil for Food program--did not share with the Security Council and has refused to provide to Congress.

In other words, in the interval between March 19, when Mr. Annan finally conceded in the face of overwhelming evidence that the program might after all need investigating by independent experts, and April 21, when former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker was appointed to head to the investigation, Mr. Annan's office explicitly reminded these two crucial contractors, which worked for the Secretariat's Oil for Food program checking the imports and exports involved in more than $100 billion worth of Saddam's oil sales and relief imports, to keep quiet.



Mr. Paul Volcker can be reached at
Phone: + 1 877 442 3500

Fax: + 1 212 963 0956

Email: info@iic-offp.org

www.iic-offp.org

If you have proof of innocence.

Until then you are going to have a hard time defending him.


Quote

Do you have any idea what kind of shape the world would be in if evry leader with an army at his/her disposal started recklessly invading countries they didn't like?



Congress also approved it.

Quote

ROFLMFAO



The only thing funny is your lack of understanding.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I cannot ignore what you don't present. Claiming supporting evidence exists does not make it so. Show me.



You ignored all the evidence about Dulfer and all the quotes from Gore, Kerry and Burger about Saddam and the WMD's.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

But, truly looking at an issue or debate from both sides is virtually unheard of these days...for some reason...there are only two sides to every story and "somebody" seems to always choose only one...



This thread was started to examine both sides of the issue. I am more than happy to examine any facts that might be presented by either side, but the same dismissive rhetoric is all I am hearing from the right.

"It can't be true, because this is America. Nothing like that could happen here."

If only that were true.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0