Zenister 0 #26 December 2, 2004 I agree, 12 hour work days are Evil.. ____________________________________ Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #27 December 3, 2004 Quote And O'Connor stated that our laws should be based on Europe's and not the Constitution - your point? .... Do you have a cite for that? It was in a fairly recent decision... I'll see if I can find it.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #28 December 3, 2004 Quotehttp://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35367 http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/26/scotus.sodomy/ http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41143 I believe that's it, Kennedy....thank you. John, my apologies for mis-speaking and making it appear that she said that in a S.C. decision - my bad. However, the general tone of her speech DOES show that she feels our laws should be modeled more after European ones.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #29 December 3, 2004 QuoteI agree, 12 hour work days are Evil.. That's my normal shift.... 12 hour days, 7 days a week... the only time off I get is sick days and vacation days... 2 weeks of vacation twice a year. It gets a bit.... wearing.... after a while.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #30 December 3, 2004 QuoteQuotehttp://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35367 http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/26/scotus.sodomy/ http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41143 I believe that's it, Kennedy....thank you. John, my apologies for mis-speaking and making it appear that she said that in a S.C. decision - my bad. However, the general tone of her speech DOES show that she feels our laws should be modeled more after European ones. That wasn't my interpretation. However, she is a Reagan appointee, so what can you expect?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #31 December 3, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuotehttp://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35367 http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/26/scotus.sodomy/ http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41143 I believe that's it, Kennedy....thank you. John, my apologies for mis-speaking and making it appear that she said that in a S.C. decision - my bad. However, the general tone of her speech DOES show that she feels our laws should be modeled more after European ones. That wasn't my interpretation. However, she is a Reagan appointee, so what can you expect? So were Renquist, Scalia and Kennedy - what's your point?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kennedy 0 #32 December 3, 2004 Just show me where the Supreme Court was intended to examine foreign laws rather than the constitution, if you please. If the constitution doesn't cover it, then the SCUS should LEAVE IT ALONE!!witty subliminal message Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards. 1* Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #33 December 3, 2004 QuoteJust show me where the Supreme Court was intended to examine foreign laws rather than the constitution, if you please. If the constitution doesn't cover it, then the SCUS should LEAVE IT ALONE!! Ed Zachary!Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #34 December 3, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuotehttp://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35367 http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/26/scotus.sodomy/ http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41143 I believe that's it, Kennedy....thank you. John, my apologies for mis-speaking and making it appear that she said that in a S.C. decision - my bad. However, the general tone of her speech DOES show that she feels our laws should be modeled more after European ones. That wasn't my interpretation. However, she is a Reagan appointee, so what can you expect? So were Renquist, Scalia and Kennedy - what's your point? Rehnquist was appointed to the SCUS by that paragon of truth and virtue Richard M. Nixon.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #35 December 3, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuotehttp://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35367 http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/26/scotus.sodomy/ http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41143 I believe that's it, Kennedy....thank you. John, my apologies for mis-speaking and making it appear that she said that in a S.C. decision - my bad. However, the general tone of her speech DOES show that she feels our laws should be modeled more after European ones. That wasn't my interpretation. However, she is a Reagan appointee, so what can you expect? So were Renquist, Scalia and Kennedy - what's your point? Rehnquist was appointed to the SCUS by that paragon of truth and virtue Richard M. Nixon. My bad - he was already an Associate Justice when Reagan made him Chief Justice. I *DID* see that in the article and it didn't "click". Again... your point?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #36 December 3, 2004 QuoteJust show me where the Supreme Court was intended to examine foreign laws rather than the constitution, if you please. If the constitution doesn't cover it, then the SCUS should LEAVE IT ALONE!! Well, for starters they cannot tell what is "cruel and unusual" without some kind of external reference, now can they?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
