jdhill 0 #1 November 24, 2004 Inspired by PK's post... What do you think? JAll that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. - Edmund Burke Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhreeZone 20 #2 November 24, 2004 Major or minor reform.Yesterday is history And tomorrow is a mystery Parachutemanuals.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndyMan 7 #3 November 24, 2004 I've never seen any organization, whether it be commercial, governmental, or NGO that doesn't need some kind of reform. _Am__ You put the fun in "funnel" - craichead. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jdhill 0 #4 November 24, 2004 For the poll, meaningul reform of the makeup or processes... My personal opinion, the internal systems, procedures, and controls need serious reformAll that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. - Edmund Burke Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AdD 1 #5 November 24, 2004 I think the UN can only be effective if its members cooperate. If members continue to ignore the rules they don't like, why should anyone else abide by them?Life is ez On the dz Every jumper's dream 3 rigs and an airstream Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhreeZone 20 #6 November 24, 2004 There are huge amounts of the UN that could use some minor tweeking to be better, but then there are also parts that need a large reform. Over all its an 80/20 answer. 80% of the good gets overshadowed by the 20% thats bad.Yesterday is history And tomorrow is a mystery Parachutemanuals.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #7 November 24, 2004 Too much money. Too much power. It will never again work."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #8 November 24, 2004 Now I'm really confused. Ron is going around saying they are toothless, and you're saying they have too much power Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,116 #9 November 24, 2004 >Ron is going around saying they are toothless, and you're saying they have too much power . . . They are toothless when we want them to do something and they won't; they have too much power when they try to do something we don't want them to do. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #10 November 24, 2004 Quote>Ron is going around saying they are toothless, and you're saying they have too much power . . . They are toothless when we want them to do something and they won't; they have too much power when they try to do something we don't want them to do. They are toothless when they are asked to do something important and powerful when it comes to stealing and covering up corruption. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #11 November 26, 2004 Quote>Ron is going around saying they are toothless, and you're saying they have too much power . . . They are toothless when we want them to do something and they won't; they have too much power when they try to do something we don't want them to do. Thanks for answering for me....Of course you got it wrong, but nice try. They are worthless and toothless when they need to do something that is important. Iraq, Darfor. They are powerful when they dont need to be, ya know stealing money, selling arms to Iraq, abusing their power in sex scandels."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites