Recommended Posts
jenfly00 0
QuoteQuoteQuoteVery long and very detailed...
The Rise of American Fascism
pretty short actually "The page cannot be displayed"
Fixed
A most interesting read! Thank you.
The times were fueled by racism (remember, this was a time when all middle-aged citizens experienced the beginning of the transition of Blacks from property to free men and women) and economics. There have always been members of society who thrive on hatred and fear. When times are right, they find larger audiences of more or less good people. To look back on the times and see the evil these people worked is frightening. To see their successors working the same evil today is even more so.
The 1920's and 30's were, however eras of social fascism with severe unemployment in the 30's motivating good people to do bad things ...much like the new patriots of today. I read the words of the 'patriots' posting here, waving the flag and justifying removing basic freedoms for the 'greater good' and wonder if history will remember them with the same revulsion we now view these dark souls of the 20's and 30's.
What differences exist between the present and the social structure then. What they had, was Franklin and Elenor Roosevelt. A president who took extrodinary measures to heal his country and a first lady who unyeildingly stood her ground against racial hatred. Together, with other good people, they helped turn the tide and were insturmental in preventing social fascism from becoming a fascist government.
What we have is a president (or those who control him) who feeds the fear to increase their power and profit.
If the 'patriots' continue to grow and spread, who will stand before them in opposition without the government stepping in with whispers of 'terrorist' and 'patriot act' dissipating in the night?
-----------------------
"O brave new world that has such people in it".
"O brave new world that has such people in it".
Do you consider George's book to be warnings about going too far right or too far left? hard to tell here, but I think you got his message backwards.
Bill's response fits my thoughts to your direct question. Our Exec and Leg is out of balance and that encourages the fringe groups (which many here seem to have a hard time separating from the typical Rep on the street - much like many confuse fringe lefties from the typ Dem on the street).
I think the before the "coup", we'll see a rebalance of some kind. The real scare is over compensation by a knee jerk partisan populace.
Exec - fiscally conservative, socially sensitive (has input to the bucks, but must represent ALL the people and be the symbol of the nation to other countries - has to have the balls to veto irresponsible spending) (right now have someone not fiscally cons, 'maybe' sensitive to social issues but not really acting on it IYKWIM - so not a good fit, but a watered down libertarian could do it, or either party with the right guy) (either that or the Zaphod-type -> totally powerless, but a good distraction for the real people in power who are innocent as babes)
Leg - big mix, but very fiscally conservative and rather neutral on social issues (they control the $$$$) (right now? not fiscally cons, and NOT socially neutral - neither party fits the bill so we are screwed right now) have to treat the country as a business, not sway by emotion but return on investment
Judicial - Very conservative socially and neutral fiscally (they must hold the line on existing laws and not make it up, we are in a correction right now if Roberts and the new candidate are really who they seem to be)
I don't like either party as they are both spenders and the only differntiation is subjective social positioning which I think is a waste of energy.
...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites