rushmc 23 #1 October 5, 2004 http://www.cnsnews.com/ What do you all think?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,116 #2 October 5, 2004 >What do you all think? I think we will be hearing another flip flop from Rumsfeld real soon now. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #3 October 5, 2004 Quote>What do you all think? I think we will be hearing another flip flop from Rumsfeld real soon now. There is an article in the string from the link that addresses this......"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zenister 0 #4 October 5, 2004 i like this one... QuoteBremer: 'We Never Had Enough Troops on the Ground' (CNSNews.com) - The United States didn't have enough troops on the ground in Iraq when it toppled Saddam Hussein, and the U.S. "paid a big price" for it - because it "established an atmosphere of lawlessness," L. Paul Bremer said on Monday its about fucking time someone 'echelons above god' admitted this....____________________________________ Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #5 October 5, 2004 Quotehttp://www.cnsnews.com/ What do you all think? I think the link doesn't seem to work anymore. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #6 October 5, 2004 Worked fine for me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #7 October 5, 2004 QuoteWorked fine for me. It was down earlier in the day. It's back now. Nice piece about Bremmer acknowledging Bush's ineptitude in managing the situation after "Mission Accomplished" was announced. Apparently Bremmer thought his remarks were confidential (that is, he was being candid instead of spinning). Bwahahaha.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #8 October 6, 2004 Ahh, can get to it now. What do I think? I think that this guy has more credibility than secret documents linked to an internet news site. Iraq Had No Stockpiles of WMD - Duelfer 13 minutes ago Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #9 October 6, 2004 And as far as ties to AQ go... CIA Report Finds No Conclusive Zarqawi-Saddam Link Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #10 October 6, 2004 QuoteAnd as far as ties to AQ go... CIA Report Finds No Conclusive Zarqawi-Saddam Link Oh No! Not more "bad intel" from Bush/Cheney? p.s. please fix the spelling error in your sig line It gets annoying by the 100th time one sees it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #11 October 6, 2004 Hah...never noticed it. Just for you Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #12 October 6, 2004 QuoteHah...never noticed it. Just for you We professors are paid to notice such things... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,588 #13 October 6, 2004 QuoteWeUs perofessors aregit paid to noticesee such thingsstuff like that There. I fixed it for you Wendy W.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #14 October 6, 2004 QuoteQuoteWeUs perofessors aregit paid to noticesee such thingsstuff like that There. I fixed it for you Wendy W. Thnaks!... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #15 October 6, 2004 QuoteQuoteWorked fine for me. It was down earlier in the day. It's back now. Nice piece about Bremmer acknowledging Bush's ineptitude in managing the situation after "Mission Accomplished" was announced. Apparently Bremmer thought his remarks were confidential (that is, he was being candid instead of spinning). Bwahahaha. Oh yeah, I saw that while I was reading the article about documents they have in their possession proving Saddam had ties to Al Qaeda. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,116 #16 October 6, 2004 >I was reading the article about documents they have in their possession > proving Saddam had ties to Al Qaeda. Did that article also contain the proof that Iraq had WMD's when we invaded, that Hussein really did kill 400,000 people and dump them in mass graves, and that our brave invasion stopped the next 9/11 attack? Very good! You can stop reading this board; you've got everything you need to believe right there. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #17 October 6, 2004 Quote>I was reading the article about documents they have in their possession > proving Saddam had ties to Al Qaeda. Did that article also contain the proof that Iraq had WMD's when we invaded, that Hussein really did kill 400,000 people and dump them in mass graves, and that our brave invasion stopped the next 9/11 attack? Very good! You can stop reading this board; you've got everything you need to believe right there. No. I think that was another article. edit: It does say they have documents proving he had mustard gas in the summer of 2000. Does that count? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,116 #18 October 7, 2004 >edit: It does say they have documents proving he had mustard gas in >the summer of 2000. Does that count? Sure! But say it's Sarin. It sounds scarier, and no one can prove you wrong any more. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #19 October 7, 2004 Quote>edit: It does say they have documents proving he had mustard gas in >the summer of 2000. Does that count? Sure! But say it's Sarin. It sounds scarier, and no one can prove you wrong any more. Hey lighten up there. I know you Libs are panicking but I'm just telling you what the article says. Kallend read another article on the site and he says it's true. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #20 October 7, 2004 I get it. The CIA and just about every other gov't official outside of the white house has come out and said that there were no WMD and haven't been any since the end of the Gulf War, and there is no indication of any ties between Iraq and AQ. You quote unverifiable stories from an internet news site that reference leaked documents, but libs are those that appear to be panicking. Nice bit of irony on your part. Very subtle. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
