outrager 6 #26 October 5, 2004 QuoteSo much for professing peace Posessing nukes and their delivery means is the best way to insure Iran does not get attacked. In other words, it is professing peace. Too bad Saddam embarked on Kuwait misadventure before developing his own nukes. We would not have this whole mess in Iraq right now, and US would have likely backed off a bit from trying to dominate the region. bsbd! Yuri. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darius11 12 #27 October 5, 2004 I think by saying I value all life should have answered your question. I think any one who kills or takes an innocent life is scum. I wish we lived in a world with no hate. I also wish we lived in a world of justice. And just for the record Iranians are not Arabs, so I am not taking there side because we are the same race as a matter of fact I am not taking any ones side. I just like to point out facts that get left out.I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." - Kurt Cobain Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #28 October 5, 2004 Quote>even if they are correct the US Gov. does not target civilians, the terrorists > do. I agree; our motives are better than theirs. Nevertheless, we kill more innocent people than they do - even if our intentions are better. Mutters something about the road to Hell...... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
beowulf 1 #29 October 5, 2004 QuoteQuote>even if they are correct the US Gov. does not target civilians, the terrorists > do. I agree; our motives are better than theirs. Nevertheless, we kill more innocent people than they do - even if our intentions are better. Mutters something about the road to Hell... Guess you must have the answers to all of these problems, Kallend? That saying that you are referring to is not applicable to the current terrorist situation. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
falxori 0 #30 October 5, 2004 QuoteToo bad Saddam embarked on Kuwait misadventure before developing his own nukes. yeah sure, it would have been a lot easier to stop his "misadventure" if he had nukes and was willing to use them... lucky someone had the sense to cripple his nuke plans a few years earlier... O "Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crotalus01 0 #31 October 5, 2004 thank you Darius. everyone listen up for a little history on the peoples involved in this debate: Iranians, Afghans, Tajiks, and Turkmen are Persians. Arabs and Jews are Semetics. Azeris and Kyrgyz are Caucasoids. Sudanese are Nilotics. Algerians are Africans and Berbers. the link? stupid Americans think because these countries are majority muslim (Isreal excluded of course) they are populated with Arabs. NOT TRUE. other heavily muslim countries include Brunei, Phillipines, Libya, Mali, Chad, Nigeria, Tanzania, Somalia, Djibouti and Indonesia. none of which are considered arabic with the possible exception of Libya (and that is very arguable). As for me and my house, we will serve the LORD... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Botellines 0 #32 October 6, 2004 QuoteNot just intentions, but also tactics. The terrorist like to use civilians as human shields just so that it forces the US military to incur civilian casualties. Do you have any prove of that. See, it seems to me that it is only is a cheap excuse for the slaughter commited everyday in Irak. I mean, if the collateral damage was made mostly in close combat, well, i may buy it. But most of the collateral damage is made from the air. Is the pilot so naive to pretend that all the terrorist are going to get together in the dessert so they can be bombed at leisure? Isn´t the pilot aware that he is bombing a fucking city? That the U.S will not go out of their way to kill an innocent is not argued, however, give the U.S air force a target and it has the same regard for nearby innocent human lives as terrorists. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skydive-iran 0 #33 April 20, 2007 Hi all, I hope the following information may be of interest. PAAviation (www.paaviation.com) is in the process of opening the FIRST skydiving centre in Iran. This will be the first UNISEX skydive centre in the entire Middle East, uniquely allowing women to experience the thrill and exhilaration of skydiving. We are looking to emplay tandem instructors. We will provide accommodation and transport, the team will be located at a private villa with pool. Please visit the following link to view the stunning accommodation www.paaviation.com/iranian-villa.html We intend to provide tandem jumps, therefore interested parties are required to bring their own tandem rigs and equipment. If you have the experience and STAMINA this is a once in a lifetime opportunity. You will have access to a huge pool of potential skydiving addicts, as Iran has one of the youngest populations of any country in the world. The aircraft and dropzone are ready to go. We have our adverts designed and ready to be published and broadcast. We are looking to put a team of 4 tandem instructors and 1 jumpmaster/cameraman together with IMMEDIATE EFFECT. One of the tandem masters MUST be female, to allow us to train female skydivers in accordance with Islamic regulations. This will be Iran's only skydive centre, so be ready to handle the demand! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ErricoMalatesta 0 #34 April 20, 2007 QuoteHi all, I hope the following information may be of interest. PAAviation (www.paaviation.com) is in the process of opening the FIRST skydiving centre in Iran. This will be the first UNISEX skydive centre in the entire Middle East, uniquely allowing women to experience the thrill and exhilaration of skydiving. We are looking to emplay tandem instructors. We will provide accommodation and transport, the team will be located at a private villa with pool. Please visit the following link to view the stunning accommodation www.paaviation.com/iranian-villa.html We intend to provide tandem jumps, therefore interested parties are required to bring their own tandem rigs and equipment. If you have the experience and STAMINA this is a once in a lifetime opportunity. You will have access to a huge pool of potential skydiving addicts, as Iran has one of the youngest populations of any country in the world. The aircraft and dropzone are ready to go. We have our adverts designed and ready to be published and broadcast. We are looking to put a team of 4 tandem instructors and 1 jumpmaster/cameraman together with IMMEDIATE EFFECT. One of the tandem masters MUST be female, to allow us to train female skydivers in accordance with Islamic regulations. This will be Iran's only skydive centre, so be ready to handle the demand! That looks like a sweet job and now that you have bumped the thread... I’m just going to have to go through it with my cup of tea in hand and dish out some sanity Quote I am willing to bet that the terrorists have killed more innocent people then the US has. You later correct what you mean with this but for the moment, SUPER LOL Quote So much for professing peace 1. Iran have not attacked another country in modern history 2. As others have said when you attack countries with no WMD's and negotiate with ones who have them , you send a clear message. 3. U.S have 10,000 nukes, Israel have a couple thou, Iran is not allowed ONE, MAYBE, IN A COUPLE OF YEARS, MAYBE. Quote Though one can form a strong argument in favor of an Israeli strike on any reactor in Iran Sure one can if you ignore the number one international law of supreme aggression. Quote they already back up many terrorist groups (freedom fighters as some of you prefer calling them) like hamas and hezballah and most of the weapons in lebanon and the gaza strip arrives from there (along with syria) Hezbollah is not a terrorist group. Quote I wasn't referring to the grand total. Just the current war on terror, including Iraq,(since that is the terrorists current battle ground). The current war on terror? Or the actual war on terror initiated under Reagan? Lets go with the current phase to keep the numbers of U.S kills out of the millions… Afghanistan? Iraq? Iraq 600,000+ from John Hopkins 650,00+ from MIT in October 06 2,000,000+ Refugees currently at a rate of 50,000 a month The rise in infant mortality is unprecedented in history and now worse than sub-Saharan Africa Afghanistan I don’t have on hand but you can be sure to had a few 10,000 more. Quote even if they are correct the US Gov. does not target civilians, the terrorists do. This is a very popular saying amongst Americans. Another popular thing for Americans is to forget the U.N charter and that invading countries is the ‘supreme international crime’ in the words of the Nuremberg tribunal. Quote Even if the US backed down to their demands and pulled out of all Islamic countries and desolved the Isreali state they would not be satisfied. Their goal would then be the conversion of all countries to Islam. Make the world Islamic. You are only right with this statement if you are talking about the people who hold those ideals, not all fundamental Islamists or Muslims in general. These ideals being held by a very small minority of Islamists the majority of whom are concerned with Islam in the Arab world and who are themselves a minority within Islam. Quote That the U.S will not go out of their way to kill an innocent is not argued, however, give the U.S air force a target and it has the same regard for nearby innocent human lives as terrorists. Incredibly well said and documented throughout the 20th century. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
