Jimbo 0 #1 September 13, 2004 I'm at the coffee shop picking up a pound of my favorite brew when I notice two magazines with cardboard covering the cover photo; Maxim and FHM. I peeled back the cardboard expecting to find some nakedness but instead found nothing more than a woman in a bikini on each cover, "Huh, that's wierd", I thought. Looking around at the rest of the magazine rack I noticed Psychology Today with a man and a woman embraced in a nude hug, more than one female fitness magazine with photos similar to the Maxim and FHM magazines, and some other magazine with a woman in a bikini. Why are the bikini clad women on Maxim and FHM somehow more offensive to those sensitive coffee-shop goers than the bikini clad women on the fitness magazines or the nude couple on Psychology Today? - Jim"Like" - The modern day comma Good bye, my friends. You are missed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nightingale 0 #2 September 13, 2004 its usually up to the individual store. Privately owned establishments have the right to cover what they wish. that said, I think its silly to cover up women in bikinis. nakedness, I'd understand, but bikinis??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jimbo 0 #3 September 13, 2004 Quoteits usually up to the individual store. Privately owned establishments have the right to cover what they wish. Absolutely they do, there is no question. Quotethat said, I think its silly to cover up women in bikinis. nakedness, I'd understand, but bikinis??? And once again we agree. - Jim"Like" - The modern day comma Good bye, my friends. You are missed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
