Jib 0 #26 September 13, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuoteKerry has a valid point. The Florida GOP resisted releasing the "felon" list until forced to do so by the courts earlier this year. Only then did they decide not to use it. Forced? I thought it was a negotiated resolution? WRONG. I misread your post. It seems rather irrelevant as the list is out and the negotiated one will not be used this year anyway. -------------------------------------------------- the depth of his depravity sickens me. -- Jerry Falwell, People v. Larry Flynt Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
juanesky 0 #27 September 13, 2004 "The Massachusetts senator also criticized the president for failing to meet with the caucus since his first month in office and for what he said was a failure to meet the Biblical standard set by the Good Samaritan " How come no one mentions Skerry FAILS TO DO HIS JOB AND STILL be paid on time issue????. He shouold resign, just as he calls for other to resign for lies of his campaign/his"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peacefuljeffrey 0 #28 September 13, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuoteOr because they share the same name as a felon. Jeez - why would anyone expect to be allowed to vote if they share the same name as a felon? Funny, I thought that link said the reasons were Unknown. But I guess Kallend has all the answers. Would you like me to post the other 16,399 links? Even the Florida GOP has admitted using faulty lists of felons to disqualify voters in the 2000 election. Oh, so the Republican Party is in charge of elections in Florida, not the Board of Elections? You said that the "GOP" is the entity that disqualified voters. While the elections supervisor may have been a Republican, that is hardly "the GOP" running the election and disqualifying voters. Once again, you embellish to the point of making it seem like you're lying or misinforming. And when faults in the lists were discovered, they were NOT USED, meaning that the droves of disqualified voters as well as those who should not have been disqualified WERE able to vote, and even that didn't turn the tide for Gore (even though we all know that felons tend to vote overwhelmingly for soft-on-crime Democrats). -Jeffrey --Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,174 #29 September 14, 2004 QuoteQuoteor teach someone to read who cannot. WTF?!?! So how do all these people in the world know how to read? Were we all born literate? Yeah, I know I popped out of the womb reading Ivanhoe, what about you guys? I didn't write that - you got your thread mixed up.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,174 #30 September 14, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteOr because they share the same name as a felon. Jeez - why would anyone expect to be allowed to vote if they share the same name as a felon? Funny, I thought that link said the reasons were Unknown. But I guess Kallend has all the answers. Would you like me to post the other 16,399 links? Even the Florida GOP has admitted using faulty lists of felons to disqualify voters in the 2000 election. Oh, so the Republican Party is in charge of elections in Florida, not the Board of Elections? You said that the "GOP" is the entity that disqualified voters. While the elections supervisor may have been a Republican, that is hardly "the GOP" running the election and disqualifying voters. Once again, you embellish to the point of making it seem like you're lying or misinforming. And when faults in the lists were discovered, they were NOT USED, meaning that the droves of disqualified voters as well as those who should not have been disqualified WERE able to vote, and even that didn't turn the tide for Gore (even though we all know that felons tend to vote overwhelmingly for soft-on-crime Democrats). -Jeffrey - Wrong on 2 counts.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tunaplanet 0 #31 September 14, 2004 QuoteI didn't write that - you got your thread mixed up. You didn't say that in the ninth post on this thread? Forty-two Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,174 #32 September 14, 2004 QuoteQuoteI didn't write that - you got your thread mixed up. You didn't say that in the ninth post on this thread? Nope - it came from Jib on post #8 www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=1244796#1244796... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #33 September 14, 2004 I love this: Quote"What they did in Florida in 2000, some say they may be planning to do this year in battleground states all across this country," Kerry said You mean like winning cause they got more votes? "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #34 September 14, 2004 QuoteElection analysts say that the error rate was compounded by a high black turnout that included many new or infrequent voters more likely to make mistakes on their ballots. In many cases, ballots were disqualified because the person voted for more than one candidate for president or none at all. If you are to stupid to use a paper punch I don't want you voting."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,174 #35 September 14, 2004 QuoteQuoteElection analysts say that the error rate was compounded by a high black turnout that included many new or infrequent voters more likely to make mistakes on their ballots. In many cases, ballots were disqualified because the person voted for more than one candidate for president or none at all. If you are to stupid to use a paper punch I don't want you voting. That's fine with me. I object to disenfranchising people because they have the same name as a felon in another state, though. Funny that this list compiled by a GOP controlled board had lots of errors improperly disenfranchising black voters but hardly any relating to Cuban-Americans. Yup, funny! Funny that until forced by the court to disclose the list, this GOP controlled board wanted to keep this year's list a secret. Yes, that was funny too.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #36 September 14, 2004 QuoteIf you are to stupid to use a paper punch I don't want you voting. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- That's fine with me. Well at least we agree on something QuoteI object to disenfranchising people because they have the same name as a felon in another state, though. So do I....But to assume that these people would all vote Democratic is kinda foolish don't ya think? I mean since when has your name given a hint to your political leanings? QuoteFunny that this list compiled by a GOP controlled board had lots of errors improperly disenfranchising black voters but hardly any relating to Cuban-Americans. Yup, funny! Maybe more people with the same name comit more crimes.....You like data...check that out. QuoteFunny that until forced by the court to disclose the list, this GOP controlled board wanted to keep this year's list a secret. Yes, that was funny too. I will admit that was stupid....I don't even know why they would claim they needed it secret."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peacefuljeffrey 0 #37 September 14, 2004 QuoteQuoteIf you are to stupid to use a paper punch I don't want you voting. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- That's fine with me. Well at least we agree on something QuoteI object to disenfranchising people because they have the same name as a felon in another state, though. So do I....But to assume that these people would all vote Democratic is kinda foolish don't ya think? I mean since when has your name given a hint to your political leanings? Well, we get this from the same Democratic party that believes if you're black, you're poor, and if you're white, you're prosperous, and there we have the basis for Affirmative Action. More and more, while they try to paint themselves as compassionate and egalitarian, Democrats reveal themselves to be full-on racially prejudiced. "Blacks are poor and need affirmative action. Hispanics always vote Republican." -Jeffrey --Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
