PhillyKev 0 #1 September 8, 2004 Quote July 20, 2004 Dear Depository Librarian: The Department of Justice has asked the Superintendent of Documents to instruct depository libraries to destroy all copies of the materials listed below. Please withdraw these materials immediately and destroy them by any means to prevent disclosure of their contents. The Department of Justice has determined that these materials are for internal use only. Documents to be removed and destroyed: Title: Civil and Criminal Forfeiture Procedure Class: J 1.2:C 49/17 Item no: 0717 Shipping list: 2004-0276-M Shipping list date: May 7, 2004 Title: Select Criminal Forfeiture Forms Class: J 1.2:F 76/8 Item no.: 0717 Shipping list: 2004-0038-P Shipping list date: December 12, 2003 Title: Select Federal Asset Forfeiture Statutes Class: J 1.2:AS 7/2/2004 Item no.: 0717 Shipping list no.: 2004-0077-P Shipping list date: February 5, 2004 Title: Asset forfeiture and money laundering resource directory Class: J 1.89/3:M 74/2004 Item no.: 0717 A 11 Shipping list no. 2004-0120-P Shipping list date: March 24, 2004 Title: Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (CAFRA), PL no. 106-185, 114 Stat. 202 (2000) Class: J 1.2:C 49/16 Item no: 0717 Shipping list no.: 2000-0367-P Shipping list date: September 23, 2000 Both GPO and the U.S. Department of Justice regret any inconvenience resulting from this request and we appreciate your cooperation. Sincerely, JUDITH C. RUSSELL Superintendent of Documents Forfeiture Endangers American Rights is a national nonprofit organization dedicated to reform of federal and state asset forfeiture laws to restore due process and protect property rights in the forfeiture process. http://www.fear.org/ In 2003 the net dollar amount of forfeiture was over $450million. That's not the total, just the net amount, and it doesn't include state forfeiture, just federal. A number of state courts have held that there is no right to a jury trial at all in state civil forfeiture cases. And even when the claimant is given a trial, it is not like a criminal trial -- instead of the government having to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the burden of proof is on the property owner to prove his/her innocence and the innocence of their property Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Clownburner 0 #2 September 8, 2004 Wow, I'm even more scared now than I was before. 7CP#1 | BTR#2 | Payaso en fuego Rodriguez "I want hot chicks in my boobies!"- McBeth Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diablopilot 2 #3 September 8, 2004 Hey Quade. Here's one of those quirky little things that comes from "not unreasonable requests". How far are we really from having a manditory "must carry ID" law? Draw the line.---------------------------------------------- You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
