juanesky 0 #26 September 8, 2004 QuoteHow big was the ripple? COuld it be Bush Sr's fault?about 7 to 8 months later. Don't forget the Dot.com fiasco was during your pal administration...."According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jib 0 #27 September 9, 2004 If it has nothing to do with the Fed, why were/are interest rates low? Is it because of consumer confidence and the tech crash? You're right the effect is to increase profit margins but what is the cause? Doesn't the market ordinarily correct itself by falling to address a decreased rate of return rather than lowering interest rates? -------------------------------------------------- the depth of his depravity sickens me. -- Jerry Falwell, People v. Larry Flynt Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zenister 0 #28 September 9, 2004 so you cant come up with any supporting facts, but you still assert that it is Clinton's fault?? rotflmao... sometimes people really need to take off the political blinders...____________________________________ Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #29 September 9, 2004 QuoteFirst of all there is no way to tell which INDIVIDUAL polocies affected the economy adversly. It was in fact a miriad of small increases and "under funding" of programs that had a smalll budget to start up but would need several more percentages of it's initial budget in the upcoming years to continue operating. So, you're saying that Clinton ruined the economy by reducing federal spending? QuoteSo, we either get higher taxes to pay for thgem - or - we have to iliminate them Or Bush's plan which is increase funding, add new programs and cut taxes. Even you seem to understand that's not a feasible option. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
