lawrocket 3 #1 September 1, 2004 Here is a mirrored site that archived her blogs. She was a Washington Staff Assistant. Apparently, she is pretty hot, and according to her blog was nailing six government guys during the same timeframe. My thoughts? Washington is as morally corrupt as anyplace. This sort of blog doesn't surprise me. This is the sort of thing that happens in Gucci Gulch. Or, more directly, it's the same thing that happens everywhere, everyday, only not with government officials. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peacefuljeffrey 0 #2 September 1, 2004 I read a tiny bit of that, and I don't even believe it is genuine. If it is, that girl is vacuous, slutty, whorish, trampy, stupid, ignorant, morally corrupt/bankrupt, arrogant, conceited... the list could go on and on. What a deplorable human being. What a total shitheap of a woman. --Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zenister 0 #3 September 1, 2004 mighty nice throne you've got there.... do alot of judging in your spare time? i bet its great fun at parties...____________________________________ Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peacefuljeffrey 0 #4 September 1, 2004 Quotemighty nice throne you've got there.... do alot of judging in your spare time? i bet its great fun at parties... Oh, puhlease. Yes, let's all pretend that there is no difference between people who try, at least, to behave in a respectable, morally decent way and treat others with respect and dignity, and those who are cynical, malicious users who treat people like living trash and take as much advantage of them as possible, and then flaunt it in a blog as though it's something we should think is admirable. I don't really care whether you find me judgmental or not -- I guess it's a matter of fact, since yes, that post was judgmental. I think the issue now is whether I was justified in being judgmental of this alleged person. I don't think I was wrong. --Jeffrey "With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
miked10270 0 #5 September 1, 2004 QuoteIf it is (genuine), that girl is vacuous, slutty, whorish, trampy, stupid, ignorant, morally corrupt/bankrupt, arrogant, conceited... the list could go on and on. What a deplorable human being. What a total shitheap of a woman.- I concur. The sort of woman who'll do that AND then post it with the intent that as many people will see it cannot be considered a reliable source. Like Miles Copeland said: "Listen to what someone says to you THEN ask yourself why they're sayin it to you". Mike. Taking the piss out of the FrenchAmericans since before it was fashionable. Prenait la pisse hors du FrançaisCanadiens méridionaux puisqu'avant lui à la mode. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #6 June 10, 2005 Update: Apparently she was a reliable source. The cat she identified as "RS" is now suing her. http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0517051blog1.html Interesting reading. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites