EricTheRed 0 #1 August 25, 2004 http://www.cbn.com/CBNNews/News/040825b.aspillegible usually Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #2 August 25, 2004 QuoteIs this a flip-flop Nope...but nice try. QuoteAnd on a campaign stop in Iowa, Vice President Cheney upset some pro-family conservatives when he spoke to the issue. Cheney joined his wife, Lynne, in previous statements that show support for their daughter, Mary, who is a lesbian. The vice president, for the first time since President Bush publicly endorsed the marriage amendment, said he thinks a constitutional ban is not the right solution. Cheney said, "The states have made that fundamental decision of what constitutes a marriage, I made it clear, four years ago, when I ran and this question came up in the debates with Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT) that my view was that that was a matter for the states to decide. And that's how it ought to be handled." Just because he does not support what Bush wants its not a flip flop... Cheney has always supported his daughter, and even in the text of your artical he says that he opposed it 4 years ago. Him being vocal about it not is a play by the Republicans to gain some support from that segment, but it is not a flip-flop."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EricTheRed 0 #3 August 25, 2004 I wasn't "trying". It was an attempt to get information without having to google cheney's previous statements on FMA. I don't recall that he ever has made any statements on the FMA but I didn't know. BTW I'd like to ask him how he would VOTE on a constitutional admendment if required. IMO he's passing the buck and being weak (read afraid of the Religious Right) by not standing up for what he apparently believes in by saying that he "respects GW's policy making authority" The president is not assigned with the authority to edit the constitution (yet) That duty has been reserved by the Supreme Courtillegible usually Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #4 August 25, 2004 QuoteI made it clear, four years ago, when I ran and this question came up in the debates with Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT) that my view was that that was a matter for the states to decide. Funny, that's the same thing Bush was saying at the time. You're right, it wasn't Cheney that flipped, it was Bush that flopped. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #5 August 25, 2004 QuoteBTW I'd like to ask him how he would VOTE on a constitutional admendment if required. IMO he's passing the buck and being weak (read afraid of the Religious Right) by not standing up for what he apparently believes in by saying that he "respects GW's policy making authority" Part of being the VICE-President is that your opinion is second to the Presidents. (Kinda the whole point of Vice yaknow.)"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #6 August 25, 2004 QuoteQuote -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I made it clear, four years ago, when I ran and this question came up in the debates with Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT) that my view was that that was a matter for the states to decide. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Funny, that's the same thing Bush was saying at the time. You're right, it wasn't Cheney that flipped, it was Bush that flopped And what a fine job the States have done with it. Maybe it was the inability of the States to handle it that made it an issue."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #7 August 25, 2004 QuoteMaybe it was the inability of the States to handle it that made it an issue. So you're saying that he meant, we'll leave it up to the states to decide, as long as they decide against it. If they pass it, then they didn't handle it right and we need an amendment? Regardless, you're just justifying his flip-flop, but it's still there. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #8 August 25, 2004 QuoteSo you're saying that he meant, we'll leave it up to the states to decide, as long as they decide against it. If they pass it, then they didn't handle it right and we need an amendment? Regardless, you're just justifying his flip-flop, but it's still there No, nice try again. What I am saying is that I am sure that he would rather leave it to the States. However, since the States are making a big mess of it, and that it will effect other states unless all the States agree on the same thing..Ya can't have a legal marriage in one State be illegal in another now can you? But thats what we have now. At those times it might be needed for the Federal Government to step in and make the choice. I am quite sure he would rather leave it alone...But it is an issue now that some consider it legal and others do not. What States ALLOW same sex marriage right now?"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #9 August 25, 2004 How is that a nice try? Bush said that there should not be a constitutional amendment and that it should be left up to the states. Now he is saying the opposite. I understand you're rationale for why he changed his mind, but you can't dispute the fact that he did. Tell me how Bush completely reversing his stance on an issue is NOT a flip-flop, but whenever Kerry does, it is? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #10 August 25, 2004 QuoteBush said that there should not be a constitutional amendment and that it should be left up to the states Can you show me this? I don't remember it. QuoteI understand you're rationale for why he changed his mind, but you can't dispute the fact that he did. If he did say the former and the later...Then he did flip flop."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #11 August 25, 2004 Bush on Larry King in 2000: KING: So if a state were voting on gay marriage, you would suggest to that state not to approve it? BUSH: The state can do what they want to do. Don't try to trap me in this state's issue like you're trying to get me into. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #12 August 25, 2004 QuoteBush on Larry King in 2000: KING: So if a state were voting on gay marriage, you would suggest to that state not to approve it? BUSH: The state can do what they want to do. Don't try to trap me in this state's issue like you're trying to get me into. What the States can do as they please...He is asking to be left out of it. He got drug in by the States not being able to do anything.. I have to be honest I don't see flop...I see a guy getting dranged into a situation he didn't want."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #13 August 25, 2004 So, it's just coincidence that he started pushing for the amendment after Mass legalized gay marriage? What do you mean the states weren't able to do anything? Most of them didn't want to do anything, they wanted to leave things as they stand where marriage is defined in their state as man and woman. It wasn't until Mass changed that, and did something, that Bush pushed for an amendment. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EricTheRed 0 #14 August 25, 2004 I have to disagree with your logic here. The states DID do something. One of them legalized gay marriage. ____________________________ The R's say they are pro-states rights but when the states don't do what the Christian Conservative faction of the party likes, they step all over themselves. Consider Oregon's Right to Die laws or the Medical Marijuana laws of OR, WA, CA, NV ...illegible usually Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #15 August 25, 2004 QuoteWhat do you mean the states weren't able to do anything? Most of them didn't want to do anything, they wanted to leave things as they stand where marriage is defined in their state as man and woman. It wasn't until Mass changed that, and did something, that Bush pushed for an amendment. Some States said it was legal, others said it was illegal...MO. comes to mind. Well now there is a problem. A Marriage in Mass could not be legal in MO. Thats a problem. BTW you might be suprized here...I have floped. I am not against legal unions of gays....I don't think it's a marriage since I still think that marriage is a religious term and therefore it should be left to the churches. But I do see the need for some kind of legal union. I'm still not crazy about the right to adopt...But this site has given me more info about the situation and my views have changed some. Don't expect me to get a rainbow support sticker or anything. Have fun with that."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #16 August 25, 2004 QuoteI have to disagree with your logic here. The states DID do something. One of them legalized gay marriage. Yes, but some did one thing,a nd others di the opposite....Not exactly good for the situation."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #17 August 25, 2004 QuoteQuoteI have to disagree with your logic here. The states DID do something. One of them legalized gay marriage. Yes, but some did one thing,a nd others di the opposite....Not exactly good for the situation. What does that have to do with Bush changing his stance. He said leave it up to the states, then when they made their decisions, he said wait, that's the wrong decision, shouldn't be up to you anymore. Let me see something. Would you classify any of these as flip flops? President Bush: Flip-Flopper-In-Chief July 7, 2004 From the beginning, George W. Bush has made his own credibility a central issue. On 10/11/00, then-Gov. Bush said: "I think credibility is important.It is going to be important for the president to be credible with Congress, important for the president to be credible with foreign nations." But President Bush's serial flip-flopping raises serious questions about whether Congress and foreign leaders can rely on what he says. 1. Social Security Surplus BUSH PLEDGES NOT TO TOUCH SOCIAL SECURITY SURPLUS... "We're going to keep the promise of Social Security and keep the government from raiding the Social Security surplus." [President Bush, 3/3/01] ...BUSH SPENDS SOCIAL SECURITY SURPLUS The New York Times reported that "the president's new budget uses Social Security surpluses to pay for other programs every year through 2013, ultimately diverting more than $1.4 trillion in Social Security funds to other purposes." [The New York Times, 2/6/02] 2. Patient's Right to Sue GOVERNOR BUSH VETOES PATIENTS' RIGHT TO SUE... "Despite his campaign rhetoric in favor of a patients' bill of rights, Bush fought such a bill tooth and nail as Texas governor, vetoing a bill coauthored by Republican state Rep. John Smithee in 1995. He... constantly opposed a patient's right to sue an HMO over coverage denied that resulted in adverse health effects." [Salon, 2/7/01] ...CANDIDATE BUSH PRAISES TEXAS PATIENTS' RIGHT TO SUE... "We're one of the first states that said you can sue an HMO for denying you proper coverage... It's time for our nation to come together and do what's right for the people. And I think this is right for the people. You know, I support a national patients' bill of rights, Mr. Vice President. And I want all people covered. I don't want the law to supersede good law like we've got in Texas." [Governor Bush, 10/17/00] ...PRESIDENT BUSH'S ADMINISTRATION ARGUES AGAINST RIGHT TO SUE "To let two Texas consumers, Juan Davila and Ruby R. Calad, sue their managed-care companies for wrongful denials of medical benefits ‘would be to completely undermine' federal law regulating employee benefits, Assistant Solicitor General James A. Feldman said at oral argument March 23. Moreover, the administration's brief attacked the policy rationale for Texas's law, which is similar to statutes on the books in nine other states." [Washington Post, 4/5/04] 3. Tobacco Buyout BUSH SUPPORTS CURRENT TOBACCO FARMERS' QUOTA SYSTEM... "They've got the quota system in place -- the allotment system -- and I don't think that needs to be changed." [President Bush, 5/04] ...BUSH ADMINISTRATION WILL SUPPORT FEDERAL BUYOUT OF TOBACCO QUOTAS "The administration is open to a buyout." [White House spokeswoman Jeanie Mamo, 6/18/04] 4. North Korea BUSH WILL NOT OFFER NUCLEAR NORTH KOREA INCENTIVES TO DISARM... "We developed a bold approach under which, if the North addressed our long-standing concerns, the United States was prepared to take important steps that would have significantly improved the lives of the North Korean people. Now that North Korea's covert nuclear weapons program has come to light, we are unable to pursue this approach." [President's Statement, 11/15/02] ...BUSH ADMINISTRATION OFFERS NORTH KOREA INCENTIVES TO DISARM"Well, we will work to take steps to ease their political and economic isolation. So there would be -- what you would see would be some provisional or temporary proposals that would only lead to lasting benefit after North Korea dismantles its nuclear programs. So there would be some provisional or temporary efforts of that nature." [White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan, 6/23/04] 5. Abortion BUSH SUPPORTS A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE... "Bush said he...favors leaving up to a woman and her doctor the abortion question." [The Nation, 6/15/00, quoting the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, 5/78] ...BUSH OPPOSES A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE "I am pro-life." [Governor Bush, 10/3/00] 6. OPEC BUSH PROMISES TO FORCE OPEC TO LOWER PRICES... "What I think the president ought to do [when gas prices spike] is he ought to get on the phone with the OPEC cartel and say we expect you to open your spigots...And the president of the United States must jawbone OPEC members to lower the price." [President Bush, 1/26/00] ...BUSH REFUSES TO LOBBY OPEC LEADERS With gas prices soaring in the United States at the beginning of 2004, the Miami Herald reported the president refused to "personally lobby oil cartel leaders to change their minds." [Miami Herald, 4/1/04] 7. Iraq Funding BUSH SPOKESMAN DENIES NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THE REST OF 2004... "We do not anticipate requesting supplemental funding for '04" [White House Budget Director Joshua Bolton, 2/2/04] ...BUSH REQUESTS ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR IRAQ FOR 2004 "I am requesting that Congress establish a $25 billion contingency reserve fund for the coming fiscal year to meet all commitments to our troops." [President Bush, Statement by President, 5/5/04] 8. Condoleeza Rice Testimony BUSH SPOKESMAN SAYS RICE WON'T TESTIFY AS 'A MATTER OF PRINCIPLE'... "Again, this is not her personal preference; this goes back to a matter of principle. There is a separation of powers issue involved here. Historically, White House staffers do not testify before legislative bodies. So it's a matter of principle, not a matter of preference." [White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan, 3/9/04] ...BUSH ORDERS RICE TO TESTIFY: "Today I have informed the Commission on Terrorist Attacks Against the United States that my National Security Advisor, Dr. Condoleezza Rice, will provide public testimony." [President Bush, 3/30/04] 9. Science BUSH PLEDGES TO ISSUE REGULATIONS BASED ON SCIENCE..."I think we ought to have high standards set by agencies that rely upon science, not by what may feel good or what sounds good." [then-Governor George W. Bush, 1/15/00] ...BUSH ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS IGNORE SCIENCE "60 leading scientists—including Nobel laureates, leading medical experts, former federal agency directors and university chairs and presidents—issued a statement calling for regulatory and legislative action to restore scientific integrity to federal policymaking. According to the scientists, the Bush administration has, among other abuses, suppressed and distorted scientific analysis from federal agencies, and taken actions that have undermined the quality of scientific advisory panels." [Union of Concerned Scientists, 2/18/04] 10. Ahmed Chalabi BUSH INVITES CHALABI TO STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS...President Bush also met with Chalabi during his brief trip to Iraq last Thanksgiving [White House Documents 1/20/04, 11/27/03] ...BUSH MILITARY ASSISTS IN RAID OF CHALABI'S HOUSE "U.S. soldiers raided the home of America's one-time ally Ahmad Chalabi on Thursday and seized documents and computers." [Washington Post, 5/20/04] 11. Department of Homeland Security BUSH OPPOSES THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY..."So, creating a Cabinet office doesn't solve the problem. You still will have agencies within the federal government that have to be coordinated. So the answer is that creating a Cabinet post doesn't solve anything." [White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, 3/19/02] ...BUSH SUPPORTS THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY "So tonight, I ask the Congress to join me in creating a single, permanent department with an overriding and urgent mission: securing the homeland of America and protecting the American people." [President Bush, Address to the Nation, 6/6/02] 12. Weapons of Mass Destruction BUSH SAYS WE FOUND THE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION..."We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories...for those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them." [President Bush, Interview in Poland, 5/29/03] ...BUSH SAYS WE HAVEN'T FOUND WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION "David Kay has found the capacity to produce weapons.And when David Kay goes in and says we haven't found stockpiles yet, and there's theories as to where the weapons went. They could have been destroyed during the war. Saddam and his henchmen could have destroyed them as we entered into Iraq. They could be hidden. They could have been transported to another country, and we'll find out." [President Bush, Meet the Press, 2/7/04] 13. Free Trade BUSH SUPPORTS FREE TRADE... "I believe strongly that if we promote trade, and when we promote trade, it will help workers on both sides of this issue." [President Bush in Peru, 3/23/02] ...BUSH SUPPORTS RESTRICTIONS ON TRADE "In a decision largely driven by his political advisers, President Bush set aside his free-trade principles last year and imposed heavy tariffs on imported steel to help out struggling mills in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, two states crucial for his reelection." [Washington Post, 9/19/03] 14. Osama Bin Laden BUSH WANTS OSAMA DEAD OR ALIVE... "I want justice. And there's an old poster out West, I recall, that says, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive.'" [President Bush, on Osama Bin Laden, 09/17/01] ...BUSH DOESN'T CARE ABOUT OSAMA "I don't know where he is.You know, I just don't spend that much time on him... I truly am not that concerned about him."[President Bush, Press Conference, 3/13/02] 15. The Environment BUSH SUPPORTS MANDATORY CAPS ON CARBON DIOXIDE... "[If elected], Governor Bush will work to...establish mandatory reduction targets for emissions of four main pollutants: sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, mercury and carbon dioxide." [Bush Environmental Plan, 9/29/00] ...BUSH OPPOSES MANDATORY CAPS ON CARBON DIOXIDE "I do not believe, however, that the government should impose on power plants mandatory emissions reductions for carbon dioxide, which is not a 'pollutant' under the Clean Air Act." [President Bush, Letter to Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE), 3/13/03] 16. WMD Commission BUSH RESISTS AN OUTSIDE INVESTIGATION ON WMD INTELLIGENCE FAILURE... "The White House immediately turned aside the calls from Kay and many Democrats for an immediate outside investigation, seeking to head off any new wide-ranging election-year inquiry that might go beyond reports already being assembled by congressional committees and the Central Intelligence Agency." [NY Times, 1/29/04] ...BUSH SUPPORTS AN OUTSIDE INVESTIGATION ON WMD INTELLIGENCE FAILURE "Today, by executive order, I am creating an independent commission, chaired by Governor and former Senator Chuck Robb, Judge Laurence Silberman, to look at American intelligence capabilities, especially our intelligence about weapons of mass destruction." [President Bush, 2/6/04] 17. Creation of the 9/11 Commission BUSH OPPOSES CREATION OF INDEPENDENT 9/11 COMMISSION... "President Bush took a few minutes during his trip to Europe Thursday to voice his opposition to establishing a special commission to probe how the government dealt with terror warnings before Sept. 11." [CBS News, 5/23/02] ...BUSH SUPPORTS CREATION OF INDEPENDENT 9/11 COMMISSION "President Bush said today he now supports establishing an independent commission to investigate the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks." [ABC News, 09/20/02] 18. Time Extension for 9/11 Commission BUSH OPPOSES TIME EXTENSION FOR 9/11 COMMISSION... "President Bush and House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) have decided to oppose granting more time to an independent commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks." [Washington Post, 1/19/04] ...BUSH SUPPORTS TIME EXTENSION FOR 9/11 COMMISSION "The White House announced Wednesday its support for a request from the commission investigating the September 11, 2001 attacks for more time to complete its work." [CNN, 2/4/04] 19. One Hour Limit for 9/11 Commission Testimony BUSH LIMITS TESTIMONY IN FRONT OF 9/11 COMMISSION TO ONE HOUR... "President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have placed strict limits on the private interviews they will grant to the federal commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks, saying that they will meet only with the panel's top two officials and that Mr. Bush will submit to only a single hour of questioning, commission members said Wednesday." [NY Times, 2/26/04] ...BUSH SETS NO TIMELIMIT FOR TESTIMONY "The president's going to answer all of the questions they want to raise. Nobody's watching the clock." [White House spokesman Scott McClellan, 3/10/04] 20. Gay Marriage BUSH SAYS GAY MARRIAGE IS A STATE ISSUE... "The state can do what they want to do. Don't try to trap me in this state's issue like you're trying to get me into." [Gov. George W. Bush on Gay Marriage, Larry King Live, 2/15/00] ...BUSH SUPPORTS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT BANNING GAY MARRIAGE "Today I call upon the Congress to promptly pass, and to send to the states for ratification, an amendment to our Constitution defining and protecting marriage as a union of man and woman as husband and wife." [President Bush, 2/24/04] 21. Nation Building BUSH OPPOSES NATION BUILDING... "If we don't stop extending our troops all around the world in nation-building missions, then we're going to have a serious problem coming down the road." [Gov. George W. Bush, 10/3/00] ...BUSH SUPPORTS NATION BUILDING "We will be changing the regime of Iraq, for the good of the Iraqi people." [President Bush, 3/6/03] 22. Saddam/al Qaeda Link BUSH SAYS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEEN AL QAEDA AND SADDAM... "You can't distinguish between al Qaeda and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror." [President Bush, 9/25/02] ...BUSH SAYS SADDAM HAD NO ROLE IN AL QAEDA PLOT "We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved in Sept. 11." [President Bush, 9/17/03] 23. U.N. Resolution BUSH VOWS TO HAVE A UN VOTE NO MATTER WHAT... "No matter what the whip count is, we're calling for the vote. We want to see people stand up and say what their opinion is about Saddam Hussein and the utility of the United Nations Security Council. And so, you bet. It's time for people to show their cards, to let the world know where they stand when it comes to Saddam." [President Bush 3/6/03] ...BUSH WITHDRAWS REQUEST FOR VOTE "At a National Security Council meeting convened at the White House at 8:55 a.m., Bush finalized the decision to withdraw the resolution from consideration and prepared to deliver an address to the nation that had already been written." [Washington Post, 3/18/03] 24. Involvement in the Palestinian Conflict BUSH OPPOSES SUMMITS... "Well, we've tried summits in the past, as you may remember. It wasn't all that long ago where a summit was called and nothing happened, and as a result we had significant intifada in the area." [President Bush, 04/05/02] ...BUSH SUPPORTS SUMMITS "If a meeting advances progress toward two states living side by side in peace, I will strongly consider such a meeting. I'm committed to working toward peace in the Middle East." [President Bush, 5/23/03] 25. Campaign Finance BUSH OPPOSES MCCAIN-FEINGOLD... "George W. Bush opposes McCain-Feingold...as an infringement on free expression." [Washington Post, 3/28/2000] ...BUSH SIGNS MCCAIN-FEINGOLD INTO LAW "[T]his bill improves the current system of financing for Federal campaigns, and therefore I have signed it into law." [President Bush, at the McCain-Feingold signing ceremony, 03/27/02] Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #18 August 25, 2004 >If he did say the former and the later...Then he did flip flop. Yes, he did. All politicians do. Heck, just about all _people_ do. Do you hold all the same opinions you did when you were 17? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites