0
TheAnvil

sKerry Remarks on Troop Redeployment

Recommended Posts

Quote

yes, and that would make some one who never held the job a better expert



It does not take an expert to realize that good performance is not normally rewarded by removing the guy from the job.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

didnt spend to much time in the military did you?



I spent enough time in the service and I have enough time in the real world to know that in both places people don't get fired for doing a good job.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

didnt spend to much time in the military did you?



I spent enough time in the service and I have enough time in the real world to know that in both places people don't get fired for doing a good job.



Depends how you define "good job".

I've seen good people fired because a mediocre boss thought they were a threat.

If you narrowly define "good job" as making the boss look good, then you're right.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Depends how you define "good job".



I define it as meeting your objectives and quota's.

Quote

I've seen good people fired because a mediocre boss thought they were a threat.



Then you have some stupid friends that didn't sue.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Sue over what? At least in PA it's an at will state. I can be fired because my boss doesn't like my tie and I can't do a damn thing about it.
____



If you can prove its over the tie and the tie does not say "Fuck You" in big block letters...

He can sue and win...Trust me. I have been involved in these types of cases.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Trust me, in PA you can't. The employee has the right to collect unemployment, but you can't sue. You can only sue if you are fired for being a member of a protected class. Otherwise the lawsuit is automatically dismissed.



I have been involved in the cases in Memphis, Tampa, and Chicago.

In all but the Chicago case the guy won big money....In Chicago..They guy was an idiot that needed to be fired. In one case he didn't check his COMAIL for 3 mths.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Florida and Tennessee are Right to Work states. Illinois is not. So that makes sense.



It also makes sense that in the FL and TN cases the guys were screwed over...In the IL case the guy was a moron that had to write "L" and "R" in his shoes to put them on correctly.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Did you even read my initial post? If you were there then by all means post some of sKerry's reasoning, as I asked in my intitial post. I made the post because of sKerry's inane arguments against the troop realignment. Once I've seen specifics on the realignment itself - I'll make my own final judgement. Quite a bit of what I've seen makes sense in many respects.

I'm really unsure as to whom you were talking with regards to Mr. Clark's performance in Kosovo, but being quite familiar with the military - especially the Navy - and having friends in the officer corps of all branches I assure you Mr. Clark's performance in Kosovo is not well regarded. Then again, I haven't discussed it with any flags - perhaps you have, but I doubt it seriously.

Quade actually challenged me to read the Weas' book and though it's on my 'to read' list I haven't done so yet. Perhaps when I finish Steve Coll's Ghost Wars, which I'm reading now.

With regards to Mr. Clark's in-depth knowledge of force structure today, take a look at his retirement date and then think really, really hard about how the force structure and posture have changed since then. Then rethink your opinion.

:)



I was there, in Kosovo, not at Kerry's speach...

and your actually wrong on both counts, i know several flag officers personally and work with more on a regular basis (not many Navy though) and the date of Clark's retirement has nothing to do with his influence over force structure, planning or doctrine. Do you have any idea exactly how far out we are really planning and designing? apparently not.. Are you even aware of Clark's real influence on our current force structure, design and development programs?? What assignments did he have that put him in a position to affect it? Maybe you should do a bit more research then rethink your opinion. Perhaps you should look at his actual record while your at it too...:S

Again what were the total US casualties for the Bosnian conflict?

Since you haven’t met Clark, and now cant meet him in a military capacity, i can understand why you mistake his 'peers' resentment for lack of respect. He's an ass and an ass with authority at the time, which doesn’t make you many friends, but that doesn’t discount his expertise or experience.

Quote

Quote

didnt spend to much time in the military did you?



I spent enough time in the service and I have enough time in the real world to know that in both places people don't get fired for doing a good job.



with officers, particularly flag officers, politics and personal issues play a MUCH larger role than performance...its not enough that you do it right, you also have to do it 'their way' which isn’t always possible or beneficial to your soldiers

perhaps you should look at Clark's record too....he wasn’t 'fired' for performance.
____________________________________
Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Sue over what? At least in PA it's an at will state. I can be fired because my boss doesn't like my tie and I can't do a damn thing about it.
____



If you can prove its over the tie and the tie does not say "Fuck You" in big block letters...

He can sue and win...Trust me. I have been involved in these types of cases.



problem is you cant often 'prove' it was anything, you may never know the real reasons you were fired, and the ‘official’ reason will be good enough to keep you out of court unless your employer is a total idiot, particularly in 'at will' states. Your boss can fire you because he doesn’t like the sound of your voice but the reason might say ‘does not fit into the company work environment, ‘does not work well with others’ nice non definable reasons that you cant really defend yourself against........but none of that applies to the military where you can be relieved of you position simply on your bosses order. No reason required. No appeal allowed unless his boss overrules him...
____________________________________
Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

problem is you cant often 'prove' it was anything, you may never know the real reasons you were fired, and the ‘official’ reason will be good enough to keep you out of court unless your employer is a total idiot, particularly in 'at will' states.



When you sue they have to prove WHY they fired the guy. "Just cause" does not fly well.

Quote

Your boss can fire you because he doesn’t like the sound of your voice but the reason might say ‘does not fit into the company work environment, ‘does not work well with others’ nice non definable reasons that you cant really defend yourself against



Then he has to be able to defend and back up those claims...This is the VERY reason that those two guys got their jobs back...and a fat load of cash.

The guy in Chicago...Well they could prove he was not a good manager...There were several issues. Most of which I can't talk about. But trust me he needed to be fired...

Quote

but none of that applies to the military where you can be relieved of you position simply on your bosses order. No reason required. No appeal allowed unless his boss overrules him...



There are appeal paths in almost every area. Might be hard...but they are there.

BTW a flag officer IS political. And you know it.

And removing a Gen for no reason is not a good move. He was an ass and he didn't play well with others...That IS a reason to remove someone.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

When you sue they have to prove WHY they fired the guy. "Just cause" does not fly well.



It does in at will states. In fact, you don't even need just cause. You can say "because I felt like it." Unless they can show discrimination based on a protected class, or had some sort of contract, you have no legal standing to challenge it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

And removing a Gen for no reason is not a good move. He was an ass and he didn't play well with others...That IS a reason to remove someone.



perhaps being a 'team player' is important sometimes, but standing up for your personal principles apart from what you are ordered to do is important as well. Neither of which says anything about how well he accomplished his mission, just that he didnt get along with his boss... Shelton didnt like him at all, Hugh Shelton is an 'old school warhorse' with strict ideas as to how military operations should be conducted.. Clark is a 'new school, asynchronous, information warfare' general. Completely different approaches, and Clark has little tact with those he disagrees with, even when they out rank him.... once you get above O5 half your job is political, some people don’t do political very well. Which is why it is ironic that he ran, and expected that many of his peers (such as Gen Tommy Franks) said "absolutely not" when asked it Clark would make a good president.

But what were the total US casualties in the Balkan conflict again?

other topic
The employer doesn’t have to prove anything in 'at will employment' states. Unless you can prove clear prejudice or discrimination, your gone for any reason (or none at all) the company wishes... you may be able to appeal to your company if it's an issue with your boss, but if the company as a whole decides your gone........cyas!
____________________________________
Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


I was there, in Kosovo, not at Kerry's speach...


Good for you!
Quote


the date of Clark's retirement has nothing to do with his influence over force structure, planning or doctrine.


Oh really? I think not.
Quote


Do you have any idea exactly how far out we are really planning and designing?


Yes, actually. If you do as well then you, of course, should realize how many perturbations post-9/11 has caused in the long term sked and therefore know that any scheduling done while Clark was still in uniform bears little if any resemblance to any current schedule. Or planning based on said schedule.
Quote


Are you even aware of Clark's real influence on our current force structure, design and development programs?? What assignments did he have that put him in a position to affect it?


He would never have worn his third, much less his fourth and have command in Kosovo had he not had a great effect on it.
Quote


Maybe you should do a bit more research then rethink your opinion. Perhaps you should look at his actual record while your at it too...:S


I've done so and maintain my position.
Quote


Again what were the total US casualties for the Bosnian conflict?


I don't recall, but know it was low, if any. Could have been zero - and I truly hope it was. I don't really know why it's sequitur, but feel free to explain that to us.
Quote


Since you haven’t met Clark, and now cant meet him in a military capacity, i can understand why you mistake his 'peers' resentment for lack of respect. He's an ass and an ass with authority at the time, which doesn’t make you many friends, but that doesn’t discount his expertise or experience.


My Army friends disagree with you wholeheartedly to a man - at least those with whom I've discussed the topic. Rangers, Intel guys, infantry bubbas, and even a signal corps fellow I know. I'd love to meet Mr. Clark and debate him. Always a pleasure to destroy a Rhodes scholar in a heated debate, though it's not often one has the opportunity. I'd love to meet El Jefe Clintonista as well - without his wife.
:)
Vinny the Anvil
Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL
JACKASS POWER!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Oh really? I think not.



yea that is fairly obvious...
Quote


Do you have any idea exactly how far out we are really planning and designing?


Yes, actually. If you do as well then you, of course, should realize how many perturbations post-9/11 has caused in the long term sked and therefore know that any scheduling done while Clark was still in uniform bears little if any resemblance to any current schedule. Or planning based on said schedule.



wrong very very wrong... i wish i could tell you exactly how and why but if you think about it you should realize why i cant. Maybe someday I’ll discuss it with you over a beer, but it wont be in the next 10 years……

you've looked at Clark's record and you still dont see? there isnt much point in arguing with you then apparently credentials and experience verified by a burning bush wouldn’t be good enough for you if they are on the opposite side of the political fence. You've made up your mind and no amount of evidence will convince you otherwise..sad really Clark's record speaks for itself, no matter how many people don’t like him personally

Did you figure out what assignment Clark had that greatly affected force planning and doctrine? It had nothing to do with Kosovo. Since you've already examined his record it should be rather obvious to what i am referring..

I still don’t see any quotes for your assertions on Clark's performance. Last time i checked completing your mission (and he did complete it as well as he was allowed with the resources he was given... I suppose your going to defend Clinton's ignoring Clark's repeated requests for additional support??) with ZERO CASUALTIES to your force was not a 'failure' :S oh well... i'm glad your not in charge of any strategic operations.

In what way do you believe Clark’s failed his mission? I’d be interested in what you think he was supposed to accomplish in the first place, and what is your source for that belief? Do you have the OPORD for Kosovo on file?

Quote

My Army friends disagree with you wholeheartedly to a man



I wonder how much of that is professional opinion based on experience with him and how much is because he ran as a democrat? if they share your rabid anti-dem attitude, it wouldn’t matter if he walked on water and ended wars with a single squad, they'd still hate him because of his politics...
____________________________________
Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


wrong very very wrong... i wish i could tell you exactly how and why but if you think about it you should realize why i cant. Maybe someday I’ll discuss it with you over a beer, but it wont be in the next 10 years……


Think that if you like - I know better. It sounds like you might have served on his staff in some manner as a low field grade and gotten a couple of good OERs from the man.
Quote


you've looked at Clark's record and you still dont see? there isnt much point in arguing with you then apparently credentials and experience verified by a burning bush wouldn’t be good enough for you if they are on the opposite side of the political fence.


What the hell does a man's political leaning have to do with his performance as an officer? One of only two officers I know who is a democrat happens to be one of the best tacticians, leaders, & managers that I know.
Quote


You've made up your mind and no amount of evidence will convince you otherwise..sad really Clark's record speaks for itself, no matter how many people don’t like him personally


And what evidence have you given, exactly, other than touting zero casualties and extolling Clark's pre-Kosovo influence on future planning? Zilchoooooo...Zeeeeeroooooo...nada...EmptySet. But you're right - I have made up my mind based upon what friends have told me and what I've read. From what I can discern most operational aspects of the Kosovo campaign were executed exceptionally well.

Quote

I still don’t see any quotes for your assertions on Clark's performance. Last time i checked completing your mission (and he did complete it as well as he was allowed with the resources he was given... I suppose your going to defend Clinton's ignoring Clark's repeated requests for additional support??) with ZERO CASUALTIES to your force was not a 'failure' :S oh well


I'm really chuckling at this. 'Failure' is your terminology, not mine. I criticize Clark and mention that his performance in Kosovo didn't impress me with his acumen of strategic troop alignment and you - who I assume to be a senior Captain or Junior Major who served on his staff - have for some odd reason taken this up as some sort of crusade to convince me otherwise with regards to Clark.

Quote


... i'm glad your not in charge of any strategic operations.


I'm glad you're glad. Happiness makes the world go round. I'm glad I'm not either, because I'm a happy engineering manager - and sometimes still engineer when required. We're both happy and the world is a better place for it.

Quote

In what way do you believe Clark’s failed his mission? I’d be interested in what you think he was supposed to accomplish in the first place, and what is your source for that belief? Do you have the OPORD for Kosovo on file?


What the hell makes you think I would have an OPORD on file?
Quote


I wonder how much of that is professional opinion based on experience with him and how much is because he ran as a democrat? if they share your rabid anti-dem attitude, it wouldn’t matter if he walked on water and ended wars with a single squad, they'd still hate him because of his politics...


Three of my best Army buds were in the Balkans. A few Navy folk as well and a Devil Dog or two. Granted, the majority of the military officer corps is conservative and most officers I know have an intense dislike for democrats and their policies.

Your whole tirade in defense of Mr. Clark is quite odd to me. Disagree with me on that if you like. How about telling me why we SHOULD maintain the current force alignment in Europe/Korea? Tell me why Clark is right. LOL.

:)
Vinny the Anvil
Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL
JACKASS POWER!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The point is that political leanings have NO bearing on performance, but they do have a lot to do with how you are ‘rewarded’ for that performance.

Its pretty obvious I have more direct knowledge to base my opinion on Clark's performance, knowledge and expertise, as in is he qualified to make determinations about military readiness something you claim "He's no expert" when clearly he is.

Quote

What the hell makes you think I would have an OPORD on file?



So you cant even explain what Clark's mission was in Kosovo and yet you make conclusions about his performance of it? really really sad. To bad ignorance isn’t painful

Quote

From what I can discern most operational aspects of the Kosovo campaign were executed exceptionally well.



But this observation leads you to

Quote

After his performance in the Balkans, my assessment is that he's not an expert.




What I'm refuting is your ignorant assertion that "he's no expert'. Clearly he is, and the political maneuverings that happens at the flag level has NOTHING to do with that expertise. If you'd bothered to read and research you’d discover (as I've said) he was an arrogant ass, but a very competent one, and one who has a great deal of influence over the US military, but then it is also fairly obvious you don’t know or understand how we teach and develop military doctrine or how long it takes to make significant changes. The US military does not reinvent the wheel every year, nor every decade even. Long Term goals and planning and goals have been refined and reevaluated, but the fundamentals have not changed.

Keep guessing, its amusing to watch, your way off on my position and job function while in Kosovo. But then you've shown a predilection for making assertions without any real information to back them, so I’m not expecting any great revelations from you. All I have defended is Clark's expertise, not his personality or anything to do with the specifics of realignment, unlike you I don’t draw conclusions until i have more (and from accurate sources as opposed to political opinions from those with no direct knowledge) information. And I give a rat’s ass about political leanings really, its all about military proficiency. Something Clark has demonstrated over the course of his career, no matter what his political opponents might assert now….
____________________________________
Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My ignorance, eh?

Bwwwaaaaaaahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaa! Bwaaaahahahahahahaaaaa!

After reading this I'm really glad I was off on my guess as to what you did in Kosovo. edited by TheAnvil due to the strange and inexplicable proclivity of some people to read personal attacks into my prose where none exist

If you were thinking strategically - you aren't - you'd realize that even if Clark executed the OPORD to perfection and then some (and as I stated the operational execution of the Kosovo conflict seemed superb), his performance over there as a whole doesn't dazzle me with his expertise with regards to realigning our European force structure. Troop realignments aren't only a tactical process. They are strategic, economical, tactical and political in nature. Think really hard about it and I'm sure you'll see why I question that expertise. Then, by all means, think about discussing the realignment itself. I'll hand it to Clark - unlike his fellow dem sKerry, he hasn't flip-flopped on it. At least not yet.

:D:)
Vinny the Anvil
Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL
JACKASS POWER!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Ok, so is he for or against it?



both :P



Those flip-floppers are so irritating!

"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
- G.W. Bush, 9/13/01


"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

"I want justice...There's an old poster out West, as I recall, that said, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive,'"
- G.W. Bush, 9/17/01, UPI


"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0