0
turtlespeed

New Semi-religious poll

Recommended Posts

No grey areas.
No maybes.
Simply yes or no.
Answer how you feel.

If a man is married to a woman, and he has a homosexual relationship with another man, is that adultry?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>If a man is married to a woman, and he has a homosexual
> relationship with another man, is that adultry?

Doesn't matter what sex the other person is. If a guy does something with another man that would be considered adultery with a woman, it's still adultery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>If a man is married to a woman, and he has a homosexual
> relationship with another man, is that adultry?

Doesn't matter what sex the other person is. If a guy does something with another man that would be considered adultery with a woman, it's still adultery.



Why?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Why wouldn't it be adultry?

-
Jim



Because - isn't marriage between only a man and a woman? Even California says that.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Why?


Well, Webster says:
Quote

: voluntary sexual intercourse between a married man and someone other than his wife or between a married woman and someone other than her husband; also : an act of adultery



Unless you're saying that a man can't have sexual intercourse with a man, or that a woman can't have sexual intercourse with a woman, then I'd have to say that adultery can happen between members of the same sex.

And if sexual intercourse is only insertion, then, well, maybe Bill didn't have sex with "that woman." :)
Basically, adultery to me is about betraying the relationship. If you have a sexual relationship with someone else, then it's adultery. It probably gets fuzzy if it's a sheep (bada-boom!), but the idea of marriage is pledging your troth to one other person.

Wendy W.
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


Why wouldn't it be adultry?

-
Jim



Because - isn't marriage between only a man and a woman? Even California says that.



Adultery is SEX outside of marriage, not MARRIAGE outside of marriage.

Since a man could have SEX with another man outside his marriage to a woman, yes, it's clearly adultery.

Only a person trying to hedge around doing what is right would try to excuse it as not being adultery.

-
-Jeffrey
"With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Basically, adultery to me is about betraying the relationship.



so if the spouse is fully aware of what is going on there is no betrayal and therefore no adultery?? or is it still adultery it is just not 'cheating'?
____________________________________
Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's an interesting question, and I think you hit the nail on the head. It's not cheating, but it's still adultery.

Wendy W.
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That would be an open marriage. I don't know that there is anything inherently wrong with it, if marriage is an agreement. What would a multiple-wives arrangement (legal in some countries) be considered here but an open marriage in one sense?

I do know that the only couple I ever knew who had one ended up with one unhappy and one happy partner, supposedly attributed to the open nature of the marriage. And that was from the open partner (who agreed that it was damaging and quit).

It's not for me, but then neither is tripe.

Wendy W.
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


If a man is married to a woman, and he has a homosexual relationship with another man, is that adultry?



what about sheep? - not so unusual in some countries (and states)
*******************************************************************
Fear causes hesitation, and hesitation will cause your worst fears to come true

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Add to that my understanding that the catholic view is having sexual intercourse with anyone who is not your spouse. Therefore 2 single people that have sex are commiting adultery.



You're right and you're wrong. According to the Catholic faith, sex between two single people is called fornication, not adultery. However, it still falls under the same commandment about not commiting adultery.



_________________________________________
Chris






Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

so then the next question, apart from religious reasonings what is wrong with adultery when the spouse is fully aware?



It isn't a question about right and wrong. Even if it is an open marriage, it still falls under the definition of adultery.



_________________________________________
Chris






Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>so if the spouse is fully aware of what is going on there is no
> betrayal and therefore no adultery?? or is it still adultery it is just
> not 'cheating'?

Adultery has a definition (sex with someone other than the person one is married to) just as fornication (sex between two unmarried people) and sodomy (any 'unusual' sexual intercourse) have definitions. Most people I know have engaged in both sodomy and fornication, and have no problem with it even with the negative connotations the words have. In a similar vein, I think that adultery is no problem either, as long as the three people involved do not have a problem with it. It is their decision. If all three are OK with it, it's neither cheating nor morally wrong - but is still adultery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

If a man is married to a woman, and he has a homosexual relationship with another man, is that adultry?


Interesting question.

Yes, it's cheating, yes it's adultery, and yes, it is incredibly difficult to deal with on all levels.

If they knew they were gay, but entered into a committed relationship and didn't tell the partner, that is about the worst thing I could think of happening. There are massive significant emotional - and potential - ramifications. The unknowing partner has not been able to make decisions with full knowledge of the situation. That is adultery, no doubt.

If someone is "trying it out," and in a committed relationship, that should be immediately made known to the partner. The partner can then make decisions for their life, sanity and wellbeing from a position of full knowledge. If the decision is to stay together *with full understanding of the circumstances of the union* at that point, then it's no-one's business.

If someone doesn't know, and has no inkling, that they are gay, and only discovers it after they are in a longterm, comitted relationship, and then they fall in love with someone of the same sex, then immediate and full disclosure is vital to everyone's wellbeing. Again, if the decision is to stay together *with full understanding of the circumstances of the union* at that point, then it's no-one's business.

Ciels-
Michele


~Do Angels keep the dreams we seek
While our hearts lie bleeding?~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Again, if the decision is to stay together *with full understanding of the circumstances of the union* at that point, then it's no-one's business.



In -any- case, it's nobody's business other than those directly involved in the triangle itself.

The ONLY way this particular incident becomes somebody's business is if the rumors are true about blackmail/favoritism/sexual harassment.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

In -any- case, it's nobody's business other than those directly involved in the triangle itself.


I can't wholly agree.

If there is an agreement (the last two scenarios), then no, it's not someone's business. If the first scenario, it's the business of the person who was wronged, and whoever they choose to tell...

The governor's situation, if you read my thread, I believe is something about blackmail/sexual harassment...I know that threatening to out someone is absolute moral turpitude...outting themselves so as to take the wind from the blackmailer's sails, and is an untenable situation at best. It does ameliorate the circumstances, and is a common tactic used in damage control situations and PR...

It still doesn't negate the discussion TS started...which is, simply, is it adultery if it's a homosexual relationship, yes or no.

Ciels-
Michele


~Do Angels keep the dreams we seek
While our hearts lie bleeding?~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0