DrunkMonkey 0 #1 July 26, 2004 6:00 PM Opening Prayer led by the Reverend Jerry Fallwell 6:30 PM Pledge of Allegiance 6:35 PM Burning of Bill of Rights (excluding 2nd amendment) 6:45 PM Salute to the Coalition of the Willing 6:46 PM Seminar #1 Getting your kid a military deferment 7:30 PM First Presidential Beer Bong 7:35 PM Serve Freedom Fries 7:40 PM EPA Address #1: Mercury - it's what's for dinner. 8:00 PM Vote on which country to invade next 8:10 PM Call EMTs to revive Rush Limbaugh 8:15 PM John Ashcroft Lecture: The Homos are after your children 8:30 PM Round table discussion on reproductive rights (MEN only) 8:50 PM Seminar #2 Corporations: The government of the future 9:00 PM Condi Rice sings "Can't Help Lovin' Dat Man" 9:05 PM Second Presidential Beer Bong 9:10 PM EPA Address #2 Trees: The real cause of forest fires 9:30 PM Break for secret meetings 10:00 PM Second prayer led by Cal Thomas 10:15 PM Lecture by Carl Rove: Doublespeak made easy 10:30 PM Rumsfeld demonstration of how to squint and talk macho 10:35 PM Bush demonstration of trademark "deer in headlights" stare. 10:40 PM John Ashcroft demonstrates new mandatory kevlar chastity belt 10:45 PM Clarence Thomas reads list of black republicans 10:46 PM Third Presidential Beer Bong 10:50 PM Seminar #3 Education: a drain on our nation's economy. 11:10 PM Hillary Clinton Pinata 11:20 PM Second Lecture by John Ashcroft: Evolutionists: The dangerous cult 11:30 PM Call EMTs to revive Rush Limbaugh again. 11:35 PM Blame Clinton 11:40 PM Laura serves milk and cookies 11:50 PM Closing Prayer led by Jesus Himself 12: 00PM Nomination of George W. Bush as Holy Supreme Planetary Overlord Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,151 #2 July 26, 2004 Hmmm... And I thought it was going to be one of those joke agendas... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheAnvil 0 #3 July 26, 2004 The pinata of Madame Clintonista should be at the end as part of the celebration. And one pinata wouldn't do. Several would be needed. Teddy 'The Bottle', Daschle, and Bubba at a minimum should also have pinatas. Odd thing about that spelling - conservatives don't support racial discrimination. Vinny the Anvil Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL JACKASS POWER!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #4 July 26, 2004 Quote . . . conservatives don't support racial discrimination. I think very few political parties are going to -admit- they support racial discrimination. That said, actions speak louder than words.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheAnvil 0 #5 July 26, 2004 Agreed. Vinny the Anvil Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL JACKASS POWER!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trent 0 #6 July 26, 2004 yeah, yeah... affirmative action speaks louder than words.... you got it!Oh, hello again! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheAnvil 0 #7 July 26, 2004 TheAnvil is a sneaky subtle sonofabiatch. Vinny the Anvil Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL JACKASS POWER!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CrazyIvan 0 #8 July 26, 2004 Sounds like fun.__________________________________________ Blue Skies and May the Force be with you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #9 July 26, 2004 A lot of alliteration by sneaky sons shows scant subtly. Seriously, if a particular group fo people have been mistreated by other people, then they ususally don't vote for the oppressors. All one need do is look at who is voting for who and you'll see which parties are for and agaisnt which people.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trent 0 #10 July 26, 2004 Or which people are being conned and coddled by which party. You accuse the republican voters of being fooled by GWB all the time, is it such a stretch to think that the dems are fooling people?Oh, hello again! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #11 July 26, 2004 Oh no. ALL politicians pander to a certain extent. Some politicians have built their entire careers based solely on what pork or other benefits they can bring back to their constituents. To think otherwise is simply to stick your head in the sand (which, some people do anyway). I guess the difference for me is that if you're going to rob one class of people for the benefit of another -- I'd rather be on the same side as Robin Hood.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #12 July 26, 2004 QuoteYou accuse the republican voters of being fooled by GWB all the time, is it such a stretch to think that the dems are fooling people? Both parties are trying to fool people. To deny that is to be fooled yourself. And remember... "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -GWB Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trent 0 #13 July 26, 2004 My reply was to this: QuoteSeriously, if a particular group fo people have been mistreated by other people, then they ususally don't vote for the oppressors. All one need do is look at who is voting for who and you'll see which parties are for and agaisnt which people. I don't think that either party is for or against minorities. I think they're out for themselves. The dems just do better at kissing as much minority ass as they can. I don't think they really help them as opposed to giving lip service to get votes. Kev, did you just bring up GWB in the middle of a conversation about something else? Don't you always complain when people bring up clinton/blowjob/kerry sucks in unrelated arguments instead of dealing with the conversation at hand? Come now... you're a better debater than that! (I just had to do it, Kev... you know I did)Oh, hello again! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #14 July 26, 2004 QuoteKev, did you just bring up GWB in the middle of a conversation about something else? Actually, you brought him up in your last post Besides, that quote was SOOO appropriate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
juanesky 0 #15 July 26, 2004 QuoteCome now... you're a better debater than that! (I just had to do it, Kev... you know I did) Hope it is not a Master debater..."According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trent 0 #16 July 26, 2004 Oh come on... that's stretching it. You just make fun because he's worse at conning people than the dems are!Oh, hello again! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheAnvil 0 #17 July 26, 2004 Except for the Robin Hood paradigm doesn't exist here. The Dem paradigm is rob from the achievers to benefit the lazy.Vinny the Anvil Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL JACKASS POWER!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelel01 1 #18 July 26, 2004 "Lazy" and "disadvantaged" are not necessarily the same . . . also not mutually exclusive, of course, but not the same thing. Kelly Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #19 July 26, 2004 QuoteExcept for the Robin Hood paradigm doesn't exist here. The Dem paradigm is rob from the achievers to benefit the lazy. Robin Hood stole from the government (the nobility) to give back to the people what the government took from them. (Robin Hood was a Libertarian, not a Republican and absolutely the opposite of a Democrat) From another thread though - http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=991053#991053 ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #20 July 26, 2004 QuoteQuote . . . conservatives don't support racial discrimination. I think very few political parties are going to -admit- they support racial discrimination. That said, actions speak louder than words. Right ON! As affirmative action calls out the races . . . .I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MC208B 0 #21 July 26, 2004 That "won't get fooled again" thing is a GWB classic! Love it! That's one of the things I love about President Bush, those verbal fuckupsBTW, I was a Bush supporter, voted for him in 2000. I still admire him in many ways, but the misadventure in Iraq has pretty much turned me against his reelection. I think I will vote libertarian this time. Of course my nephews reserve unit being activated and my nephew being in country (Iraq) in a couple months might have swayed my opinions too Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TomAiello 26 #22 July 27, 2004 QuoteI think very few political parties are going to -admit- they support racial discrimination. That said, actions speak louder than words. Hmmm. You mean actions like being the party of the "Solid South" during the height of the Klan years?-- Tom Aiello Tom@SnakeRiverBASE.com SnakeRiverBASE.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #23 July 27, 2004 The "Solid South" basically flipped after 1964. There's an interesting history web page http://www.umich.edu/~lawrace/votetour1.htm that breaks down the changes over the years. I'm not certain that I completely agree with their analysis, but they do seem to have the data to back up their theories. Certainly over the years both parties have changed enough that they no longer even remotely resemble what they once were.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
