fudd 0 #51 July 22, 2004 It's not that the U.N. would organize the election. They would monitor that it's a fair election process. I don't get why this is a bad thing. If the U.N. wants to monitor a Norwegian election they are welcome. I stongly doubt that they would meet much resistance. There are only 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
storm1977 0 #52 July 22, 2004 I know why it's a bad idea..... Because it is a waste of Fucking money. The USA is and has been quite capible of running its own election without international scrutiny or support. There are a great deal of things the UN could do with the time and money it would take to "Monitor" the election. I know nothing about Norway. I won't pretend to, but my assumtion is that this is a country which is used to international involvment. Many European countries are. Mainly because they are small and close by. What one country does can dramatically affect surrounding countries. The USA has never been that way. We have always been a bit isolationistic since our conseption. PS - if Isolationistic isn't a word, then it is now ----------------------------------------------------- Sometimes it is more important to protect LIFE than Liberty Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pajarito 0 #53 July 22, 2004 QuoteThe USA is and has been quite capible of running its own election without international scrutiny or support. ABSOLUTELY!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #54 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuoteThe USA is and has been quite capible of running its own election without international scrutiny or support. ABSOLUTELY!!! Yes, just ask the folks in Palm Beach County.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #55 July 22, 2004 QuoteYes, just ask the folks in Palm Beach County. how would UN observers have helped that situation? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pajarito 0 #56 July 22, 2004 QuoteYes, just ask the folks in Palm Beach County. Counted, recounted, confirmed, people gotta get over it sometime and stop whining... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #57 July 22, 2004 QuoteA couple of points: - The U.S. has never been properly called a "democracy." Remember the quote by Ben Franklin after the Constitutional Convention: they asked him what had been created, and he said, "A Republic, if you can keep it." Couldn't agree with you more and if you weren't jumping to conclusions with wrong assumptions you would realize that is excactly what I wrote. Some one said something about American Democracy and I commented there was no such thing. I am happy to see that you agree with me. QuoteYou are asserting impropriety when a candidate got more of the popular vote and did not win the election, but if you know anything about our system you know that we never said that the popular vote WAS the basis of winning the election -- the electoral college is. I know all that, once again, leave your assumptions out of this and just read what I wrote. Fact remains, more people voted for Gore than for any other candidate, yet he did not win. that precludes democracy. I didn't make any statements about the system being right or wrong, but many Americans on this board seem to feel easily attacked. QuoteYou aren't even making a clear and proper distinction between "majority" and "plurality." We hardly ever see a candidate for public office win with a MAJORITY -- which means more than 50% of the votes -- unless there are only two people running in the race. Most presidents win with what, 30something or 40something percent? That's because there's at least one other person people are voting for. Get it straight. The word you're looking for is "PLURALITY." It means the greatest share of the percentages. "that which we call a rose, would smell as sweet by any other name" You are right, should have used a different term, doesn't change the fact though Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites PhillyKev 0 #58 July 22, 2004 QuoteYou aren't even making a clear and proper distinction between "majority" and "plurality." We hardly ever see a candidate for public office win with a MAJORITY -- which means more than 50% of the votes -- unless there are only two people running in the race. Most presidents win with what, 30something or 40something percent? That's because there's at least one other person people are voting for. Get it straight. The word you're looking for is "PLURALITY." It means the greatest share of the percentages. Actually, of the 35 presidential elections since the Republican party formed, 21 have been won by a popular majority. Interesting thing about that is 5 of those 21 were dems, and 16 were reps. So, it seems that 3rd party candidate are a boon to dems. Thank you republican party for helping to get Nader on the ballots Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites storm1977 0 #59 July 22, 2004 QuoteThank you republican party for helping to get Nader on the ballots I don' think your sample is large enough to draw conclusions. Obviously each situation is different. ----------------------------------------------------- Sometimes it is more important to protect LIFE than Liberty Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,146 #60 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuoteYes, just ask the folks in Palm Beach County. Counted, recounted, confirmed, people gotta get over it sometime and stop whining... Really? What about all the people improperly excluded from the voter lists? I don't think their votes EVER got counted.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites storm1977 0 #61 July 22, 2004 Were they all voting for Gore? Since the votes left out in EVERY state reflect the general population you can assume the same balance of votes. Now if you intentionally don't allow a specific demographic that is different. I din't see that headline in the papers, so who are you talking about? ----------------------------------------------------- Sometimes it is more important to protect LIFE than Liberty Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites pajarito 0 #62 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuoteYes, just ask the folks in Palm Beach County. Counted, recounted, confirmed, people gotta get over it sometime and stop whining... Really? What about all the people improperly excluded from the voter lists? I don't think their votes EVER got counted. Who are you referring to? Convicted felons, illegal aliens, or just people just to f$*&%@# stupid to walk around let alone fill out a ballot and actually know who they're voting for? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,146 #63 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteYes, just ask the folks in Palm Beach County. Counted, recounted, confirmed, people gotta get over it sometime and stop whining... Really? What about all the people improperly excluded from the voter lists? I don't think their votes EVER got counted. Who are you referring to? Convicted felons, illegal aliens, or just people just to f$*&%@# stupid to walk around let alone fill out a ballot and actually know who they're voting for? Pay attention! The thousands IMPROPERLY exluded from voting because Florida bought a defective list of felons from Texas, courtesy of a firm with ties to the Republican party. 62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. And in 2004 Florida tried to prevent anyone seeing the current list (even though it still might have lots of errors) until a judge ordered them to release it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites storm1977 0 #64 July 22, 2004 Must be that CONSERVATIVE media coving up this story!!!!! Thousands you say.... How many thousand. How do you know what they would have voted? What was the margin of votes in FLA? If 10K were omitted and let's pretend they all would have voted and let's pretend they all would have voted for what they were registered as.... This seems far fetched.... Keep trying to find something Kallend that justifies you saying Gore really should have won. GORE Lost :-) Deal with it. Can't you guys move on ????? ----------------------------------------------------- Sometimes it is more important to protect LIFE than Liberty Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,146 #65 July 22, 2004 QuoteMust be that CONSERVATIVE media coving up this story!!!!! Thousands you say.... How many thousand. How do you know what they would have voted? What was the margin of votes in FLA? If 10K were omitted and let's pretend they all would have voted and let's pretend they all would have voted for what they were registered as.... This seems far fetched.... Keep trying to find something Kallend that justifies you saying Gore really should have won. GORE Lost :-) Deal with it. Can't you guys move on ????? www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/01/florida.elections/ I never said he didn't. I was disputing that the US is capable of running its elections properly. www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=1168581#1168581 Pay attention!... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites pajarito 0 #66 July 22, 2004 Wha...oh...ok....I'm paying attention now. Aside from what Storm1977 posted, I'm just wondering when you're going to start the revolution? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites PhillyKev 0 #67 July 22, 2004 To paraphrase a quote someone posted yesterday... The system is too broken to fix, but not yet bad enough to shoot the bastards. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites pajarito 0 #68 July 22, 2004 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #69 July 22, 2004 Quote62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. So 62% of convicted felons identify with the Democratic Party. I wonder why that is? Likes attract? Have you factored in the absentee ballots from the Military that weren't counted? Wonder what the percentage of Military voted Democratic compared to convicted felons? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,146 #70 July 22, 2004 Quote Quote62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. So 62% of convicted felons identify with the Democratic Party. I wonder why that is? Likes attract? Quote Pay attention. They were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. And they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. I guess the reason some people are Bush supporters is that they have shorter attention spans than he does.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #71 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuote Quote62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. So 62% of convicted felons identify with the Democratic Party. I wonder why that is? Likes attract? Quote Pay attention. They were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. And they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. I guess the reason some people are Bush supporters is that they have shorter attention spans than he does. How do you keep getting away with these personal snipes? If I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. Oh, sorry, I forgot most of the moderators are lefties. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites PhillyKev 0 #72 July 22, 2004 QuoteIf I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. From my perspective you do, and you haven't. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Jimbo 0 #73 July 22, 2004 QuoteThey were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. The Texas Republicans had a list of Florida felons? QuoteAnd they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. My guess is that they kept the list secret in an attempt to conceal the massive fuckup that they had made. I don't think it's as sinister as you suggest. - Jim"Like" - The modern day comma Good bye, my friends. You are missed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #74 July 22, 2004 Quote How do you keep getting away with these personal snipes? If I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. Oh, sorry, I forgot most of the moderators are lefties. You did just [not very subtly] imply that all Democrats are felons. You should expect a not very subtle jibe back. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,146 #75 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuote Quote62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. So 62% of convicted felons identify with the Democratic Party. I wonder why that is? Likes attract? Quote Pay attention. They were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. And they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. I guess the reason some people are Bush supporters is that they have shorter attention spans than he does. How do you keep getting away with these personal snipes? If I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. Oh, sorry, I forgot most of the moderators are lefties. Nonsense. I wrote it very clearly twice previously in this thread, and provided a link. Not my fault if you aren't paying attention.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page 3 of 5 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing × Sign In Sign Up Forums Dropzones Classifieds Gear Indoor Articles Photos Videos Calendar Stolen Fatalities Subscriptions Leaderboard Activity Back Activity All Activity My Activity Streams Unread Content Content I Started
PhillyKev 0 #58 July 22, 2004 QuoteYou aren't even making a clear and proper distinction between "majority" and "plurality." We hardly ever see a candidate for public office win with a MAJORITY -- which means more than 50% of the votes -- unless there are only two people running in the race. Most presidents win with what, 30something or 40something percent? That's because there's at least one other person people are voting for. Get it straight. The word you're looking for is "PLURALITY." It means the greatest share of the percentages. Actually, of the 35 presidential elections since the Republican party formed, 21 have been won by a popular majority. Interesting thing about that is 5 of those 21 were dems, and 16 were reps. So, it seems that 3rd party candidate are a boon to dems. Thank you republican party for helping to get Nader on the ballots Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites storm1977 0 #59 July 22, 2004 QuoteThank you republican party for helping to get Nader on the ballots I don' think your sample is large enough to draw conclusions. Obviously each situation is different. ----------------------------------------------------- Sometimes it is more important to protect LIFE than Liberty Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,146 #60 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuoteYes, just ask the folks in Palm Beach County. Counted, recounted, confirmed, people gotta get over it sometime and stop whining... Really? What about all the people improperly excluded from the voter lists? I don't think their votes EVER got counted.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites storm1977 0 #61 July 22, 2004 Were they all voting for Gore? Since the votes left out in EVERY state reflect the general population you can assume the same balance of votes. Now if you intentionally don't allow a specific demographic that is different. I din't see that headline in the papers, so who are you talking about? ----------------------------------------------------- Sometimes it is more important to protect LIFE than Liberty Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites pajarito 0 #62 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuoteYes, just ask the folks in Palm Beach County. Counted, recounted, confirmed, people gotta get over it sometime and stop whining... Really? What about all the people improperly excluded from the voter lists? I don't think their votes EVER got counted. Who are you referring to? Convicted felons, illegal aliens, or just people just to f$*&%@# stupid to walk around let alone fill out a ballot and actually know who they're voting for? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,146 #63 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteYes, just ask the folks in Palm Beach County. Counted, recounted, confirmed, people gotta get over it sometime and stop whining... Really? What about all the people improperly excluded from the voter lists? I don't think their votes EVER got counted. Who are you referring to? Convicted felons, illegal aliens, or just people just to f$*&%@# stupid to walk around let alone fill out a ballot and actually know who they're voting for? Pay attention! The thousands IMPROPERLY exluded from voting because Florida bought a defective list of felons from Texas, courtesy of a firm with ties to the Republican party. 62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. And in 2004 Florida tried to prevent anyone seeing the current list (even though it still might have lots of errors) until a judge ordered them to release it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites storm1977 0 #64 July 22, 2004 Must be that CONSERVATIVE media coving up this story!!!!! Thousands you say.... How many thousand. How do you know what they would have voted? What was the margin of votes in FLA? If 10K were omitted and let's pretend they all would have voted and let's pretend they all would have voted for what they were registered as.... This seems far fetched.... Keep trying to find something Kallend that justifies you saying Gore really should have won. GORE Lost :-) Deal with it. Can't you guys move on ????? ----------------------------------------------------- Sometimes it is more important to protect LIFE than Liberty Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,146 #65 July 22, 2004 QuoteMust be that CONSERVATIVE media coving up this story!!!!! Thousands you say.... How many thousand. How do you know what they would have voted? What was the margin of votes in FLA? If 10K were omitted and let's pretend they all would have voted and let's pretend they all would have voted for what they were registered as.... This seems far fetched.... Keep trying to find something Kallend that justifies you saying Gore really should have won. GORE Lost :-) Deal with it. Can't you guys move on ????? www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/01/florida.elections/ I never said he didn't. I was disputing that the US is capable of running its elections properly. www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=1168581#1168581 Pay attention!... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites pajarito 0 #66 July 22, 2004 Wha...oh...ok....I'm paying attention now. Aside from what Storm1977 posted, I'm just wondering when you're going to start the revolution? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites PhillyKev 0 #67 July 22, 2004 To paraphrase a quote someone posted yesterday... The system is too broken to fix, but not yet bad enough to shoot the bastards. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites pajarito 0 #68 July 22, 2004 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #69 July 22, 2004 Quote62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. So 62% of convicted felons identify with the Democratic Party. I wonder why that is? Likes attract? Have you factored in the absentee ballots from the Military that weren't counted? Wonder what the percentage of Military voted Democratic compared to convicted felons? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,146 #70 July 22, 2004 Quote Quote62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. So 62% of convicted felons identify with the Democratic Party. I wonder why that is? Likes attract? Quote Pay attention. They were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. And they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. I guess the reason some people are Bush supporters is that they have shorter attention spans than he does.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #71 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuote Quote62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. So 62% of convicted felons identify with the Democratic Party. I wonder why that is? Likes attract? Quote Pay attention. They were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. And they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. I guess the reason some people are Bush supporters is that they have shorter attention spans than he does. How do you keep getting away with these personal snipes? If I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. Oh, sorry, I forgot most of the moderators are lefties. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites PhillyKev 0 #72 July 22, 2004 QuoteIf I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. From my perspective you do, and you haven't. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Jimbo 0 #73 July 22, 2004 QuoteThey were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. The Texas Republicans had a list of Florida felons? QuoteAnd they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. My guess is that they kept the list secret in an attempt to conceal the massive fuckup that they had made. I don't think it's as sinister as you suggest. - Jim"Like" - The modern day comma Good bye, my friends. You are missed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #74 July 22, 2004 Quote How do you keep getting away with these personal snipes? If I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. Oh, sorry, I forgot most of the moderators are lefties. You did just [not very subtly] imply that all Democrats are felons. You should expect a not very subtle jibe back. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,146 #75 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuote Quote62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. So 62% of convicted felons identify with the Democratic Party. I wonder why that is? Likes attract? Quote Pay attention. They were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. And they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. I guess the reason some people are Bush supporters is that they have shorter attention spans than he does. How do you keep getting away with these personal snipes? If I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. Oh, sorry, I forgot most of the moderators are lefties. Nonsense. I wrote it very clearly twice previously in this thread, and provided a link. Not my fault if you aren't paying attention.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page 3 of 5 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing × Sign In Sign Up Forums Dropzones Classifieds Gear Indoor Articles Photos Videos Calendar Stolen Fatalities Subscriptions Leaderboard Activity Back Activity All Activity My Activity Streams Unread Content Content I Started
storm1977 0 #59 July 22, 2004 QuoteThank you republican party for helping to get Nader on the ballots I don' think your sample is large enough to draw conclusions. Obviously each situation is different. ----------------------------------------------------- Sometimes it is more important to protect LIFE than Liberty Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #60 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuoteYes, just ask the folks in Palm Beach County. Counted, recounted, confirmed, people gotta get over it sometime and stop whining... Really? What about all the people improperly excluded from the voter lists? I don't think their votes EVER got counted.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
storm1977 0 #61 July 22, 2004 Were they all voting for Gore? Since the votes left out in EVERY state reflect the general population you can assume the same balance of votes. Now if you intentionally don't allow a specific demographic that is different. I din't see that headline in the papers, so who are you talking about? ----------------------------------------------------- Sometimes it is more important to protect LIFE than Liberty Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pajarito 0 #62 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuoteYes, just ask the folks in Palm Beach County. Counted, recounted, confirmed, people gotta get over it sometime and stop whining... Really? What about all the people improperly excluded from the voter lists? I don't think their votes EVER got counted. Who are you referring to? Convicted felons, illegal aliens, or just people just to f$*&%@# stupid to walk around let alone fill out a ballot and actually know who they're voting for? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #63 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteYes, just ask the folks in Palm Beach County. Counted, recounted, confirmed, people gotta get over it sometime and stop whining... Really? What about all the people improperly excluded from the voter lists? I don't think their votes EVER got counted. Who are you referring to? Convicted felons, illegal aliens, or just people just to f$*&%@# stupid to walk around let alone fill out a ballot and actually know who they're voting for? Pay attention! The thousands IMPROPERLY exluded from voting because Florida bought a defective list of felons from Texas, courtesy of a firm with ties to the Republican party. 62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. And in 2004 Florida tried to prevent anyone seeing the current list (even though it still might have lots of errors) until a judge ordered them to release it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
storm1977 0 #64 July 22, 2004 Must be that CONSERVATIVE media coving up this story!!!!! Thousands you say.... How many thousand. How do you know what they would have voted? What was the margin of votes in FLA? If 10K were omitted and let's pretend they all would have voted and let's pretend they all would have voted for what they were registered as.... This seems far fetched.... Keep trying to find something Kallend that justifies you saying Gore really should have won. GORE Lost :-) Deal with it. Can't you guys move on ????? ----------------------------------------------------- Sometimes it is more important to protect LIFE than Liberty Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #65 July 22, 2004 QuoteMust be that CONSERVATIVE media coving up this story!!!!! Thousands you say.... How many thousand. How do you know what they would have voted? What was the margin of votes in FLA? If 10K were omitted and let's pretend they all would have voted and let's pretend they all would have voted for what they were registered as.... This seems far fetched.... Keep trying to find something Kallend that justifies you saying Gore really should have won. GORE Lost :-) Deal with it. Can't you guys move on ????? www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/01/florida.elections/ I never said he didn't. I was disputing that the US is capable of running its elections properly. www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=1168581#1168581 Pay attention!... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pajarito 0 #66 July 22, 2004 Wha...oh...ok....I'm paying attention now. Aside from what Storm1977 posted, I'm just wondering when you're going to start the revolution? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyKev 0 #67 July 22, 2004 To paraphrase a quote someone posted yesterday... The system is too broken to fix, but not yet bad enough to shoot the bastards. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #69 July 22, 2004 Quote62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. So 62% of convicted felons identify with the Democratic Party. I wonder why that is? Likes attract? Have you factored in the absentee ballots from the Military that weren't counted? Wonder what the percentage of Military voted Democratic compared to convicted felons? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #70 July 22, 2004 Quote Quote62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. So 62% of convicted felons identify with the Democratic Party. I wonder why that is? Likes attract? Quote Pay attention. They were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. And they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. I guess the reason some people are Bush supporters is that they have shorter attention spans than he does.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Gravitymaster 0 #71 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuote Quote62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. So 62% of convicted felons identify with the Democratic Party. I wonder why that is? Likes attract? Quote Pay attention. They were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. And they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. I guess the reason some people are Bush supporters is that they have shorter attention spans than he does. How do you keep getting away with these personal snipes? If I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. Oh, sorry, I forgot most of the moderators are lefties. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites PhillyKev 0 #72 July 22, 2004 QuoteIf I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. From my perspective you do, and you haven't. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Jimbo 0 #73 July 22, 2004 QuoteThey were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. The Texas Republicans had a list of Florida felons? QuoteAnd they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. My guess is that they kept the list secret in an attempt to conceal the massive fuckup that they had made. I don't think it's as sinister as you suggest. - Jim"Like" - The modern day comma Good bye, my friends. You are missed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #74 July 22, 2004 Quote How do you keep getting away with these personal snipes? If I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. Oh, sorry, I forgot most of the moderators are lefties. You did just [not very subtly] imply that all Democrats are felons. You should expect a not very subtle jibe back. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,146 #75 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuote Quote62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. So 62% of convicted felons identify with the Democratic Party. I wonder why that is? Likes attract? Quote Pay attention. They were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. And they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. I guess the reason some people are Bush supporters is that they have shorter attention spans than he does. How do you keep getting away with these personal snipes? If I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. Oh, sorry, I forgot most of the moderators are lefties. Nonsense. I wrote it very clearly twice previously in this thread, and provided a link. Not my fault if you aren't paying attention.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page 3 of 5 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing × Sign In Sign Up Forums Dropzones Classifieds Gear Indoor Articles Photos Videos Calendar Stolen Fatalities Subscriptions Leaderboard Activity Back Activity All Activity My Activity Streams Unread Content Content I Started
Gravitymaster 0 #71 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuote Quote62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. So 62% of convicted felons identify with the Democratic Party. I wonder why that is? Likes attract? Quote Pay attention. They were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. And they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. I guess the reason some people are Bush supporters is that they have shorter attention spans than he does. How do you keep getting away with these personal snipes? If I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. Oh, sorry, I forgot most of the moderators are lefties. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites PhillyKev 0 #72 July 22, 2004 QuoteIf I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. From my perspective you do, and you haven't. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Jimbo 0 #73 July 22, 2004 QuoteThey were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. The Texas Republicans had a list of Florida felons? QuoteAnd they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. My guess is that they kept the list secret in an attempt to conceal the massive fuckup that they had made. I don't think it's as sinister as you suggest. - Jim"Like" - The modern day comma Good bye, my friends. You are missed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #74 July 22, 2004 Quote How do you keep getting away with these personal snipes? If I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. Oh, sorry, I forgot most of the moderators are lefties. You did just [not very subtly] imply that all Democrats are felons. You should expect a not very subtle jibe back. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,146 #75 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuote Quote62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. So 62% of convicted felons identify with the Democratic Party. I wonder why that is? Likes attract? Quote Pay attention. They were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. And they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. I guess the reason some people are Bush supporters is that they have shorter attention spans than he does. How do you keep getting away with these personal snipes? If I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. Oh, sorry, I forgot most of the moderators are lefties. Nonsense. I wrote it very clearly twice previously in this thread, and provided a link. Not my fault if you aren't paying attention.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page 3 of 5 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
PhillyKev 0 #72 July 22, 2004 QuoteIf I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. From my perspective you do, and you haven't. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jimbo 0 #73 July 22, 2004 QuoteThey were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. The Texas Republicans had a list of Florida felons? QuoteAnd they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. My guess is that they kept the list secret in an attempt to conceal the massive fuckup that they had made. I don't think it's as sinister as you suggest. - Jim"Like" - The modern day comma Good bye, my friends. You are missed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #74 July 22, 2004 Quote How do you keep getting away with these personal snipes? If I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. Oh, sorry, I forgot most of the moderators are lefties. You did just [not very subtly] imply that all Democrats are felons. You should expect a not very subtle jibe back. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #75 July 22, 2004 QuoteQuoteQuote Quote62% of improperly excluded voters reported that they are Democrats, and 20% Republicans. So 62% of convicted felons identify with the Democratic Party. I wonder why that is? Likes attract? Quote Pay attention. They were IMPROPERLY excluded by being IMPROPERLY placed on the felons' list. The list was developed by FL Republicans, who bought names from TX Republicans, and overwhelmingly excluded Democrats. And they kept the list secret so no-one could appeal. And they tried to do it again this time but got caught out. I guess the reason some people are Bush supporters is that they have shorter attention spans than he does. How do you keep getting away with these personal snipes? If I did this as often as you do, I'd be banned. Oh, sorry, I forgot most of the moderators are lefties. Nonsense. I wrote it very clearly twice previously in this thread, and provided a link. Not my fault if you aren't paying attention.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Page 3 of 5 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
