Interesting

[PhillyKev 0]

When someone posts outright mis-information claiming that he admitted to something when he didn't, we're the nut jobs. Gotcha.

[Jimbo 0]

Quote

It is an interesting story though and I think it deserves to be watched.

Well, here's one possible motivation: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=615&e=2&u=/nm/20040721/pl_nm/security_berger_dc

-
Jim

"Like" - The modern day comma
Good bye, my friends. You are missed.

[tunaplanet 0]

Great. He's an advisor for Kerry. It's all making sense now.

Forty-two

[freeflybella 0]

It also offers an answer to why I suggested it could be convenient.

One perspective: It was a mistake with no motive. Leaked to the press days before the 9/11 commission report.

One perspective: He was going to use the notes/reports to advance Kerry's position and was discovered.

No solid conclusion yet.

What was I defending "cuz I'm s'posed to"?

Action expresses priority. - Mahatma Ghandi

[kallend 2,146]

Quote

One of the odd things about this story is he only took copies, not original documents. It's not as if he stole documents to prevent anyone from reading them. I can't figure out what his motivation was.

Senile dementia?

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

Quote

One of the odd things about this story is he only took copies, not original documents. It's not as if he stole documents to prevent anyone from reading them. I can't figure out what his motivation was.

Senile dementia?

Getting a little bolder with the personal attacks?

[mikkey 0]

Here is his explanation:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/20/berger.probe/index.html

---------------------------------------------------------
When people look like ants - pull. When ants look like people - pray.

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

Tunaplanet sez:

Uh oh. I cringe at the media labeling this, "Trouser Gate."

Seeing all the, ahem, "extracurricular activities" practiced by the last prior administration... I think this'd be Trousergate II, nicht wahr?

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

Heh. Only they weren't "unnamed officials" like he mistakenly quoted. They were archive staff. Big difference.

Honestly, half the time these liberal nutjobs don't even know why they're defending a topic. They just know they're suppoded to.

Sad.

Now if you had put your glasses on, you would have noticed that the paragraph starts with:

"Law enforcement sources said archive staff members told FBI agents "

So, the information does come from unnamed officials.

Honestly, half the time these conservative nutjobs don't even know why they are attacking a topic. They just know they are suppoded to.

Sad.

[freeflybella 0]

It really could've been an honest mistake. Someone with that much very important information to pour over for a very important reason - that's alot of pressure.

Just like I might be able to understand the whole "Bush-reads-to-kids-while-towers-burn" thing was a stunned/confused reaction.

When it comes down to it - no matter how important you think you are - or others think you are, we're all just human.

Action expresses priority. - Mahatma Ghandi

[PhillyKev 0]

Quote

Now if you had put your glasses on, you would have noticed that the paragraph starts with:

"Law enforcement sources said archive staff members told FBI agents "

And in case that wasn't clear enough, the article I referred to had the exact words "unnamed officidals". Wheras they were claiming it said "he admitted to". But I can understand the confusion....NOT!!!