quade 4 #1 July 14, 2004 http://news.myway.com/top/article/id/387144|top|07-13-2004::20:47|reuters.html Side note . . . Quote McLaughlin said he did not know what plans the White House had for permanently filling the CIA director post. "At this point about all I can tell you is they have asked me to be the acting director," he said. "I'm happy to do this and if they choose someone else, I'll work with that person to get them established and launched." Actually -- two points . . . What would be wrong with just keeping him? And . . . (the joke) . . . he's the acting director of the CIA . . . you'd think he'd be able to find out. quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
newsstand 0 #2 July 14, 2004 So if things are so bad why hasn't the color code changed? "Truth is tough. It will not break, like a bubble, at a touch; nay, you may kick it about all day like a football, and it will be round and full at evening." -- Oliver Wendell Holmes Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #3 July 14, 2004 Hmmm. Since 9/11 a.m., or 9/11 p.m.? My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tunaplanet 0 #4 July 14, 2004 QuoteSo if things are so bad why hasn't the color code changed? Who cares about a color? The specifics and warnings are all that metters. Forty-two Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #5 July 14, 2004 Quote Who cares about a color? The specifics and warnings are all that metters. You're right, for you and me as individuals it probably doesn't make one rat's ass worth of difference. However, some cities, states and businesses have specific bump-ups in their security forces and policies based on the color codes. By not bumping up the color code, extra money is not spent on security, yet if there really is an increase in threat level -- shouldn't more money be spent?quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #6 July 14, 2004 Quoteyet if there really is an increase in threat level -- shouldn't more money be spent? Actually, if you stored quarters in a sock and hit the terrorists with it, you can reuse it for some time before the quarters go flying. Much more cost effective than just whipping individual quarters at their eyes. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #7 July 14, 2004 We're not talking about quarters here. We're talking about millions of dollars in additional labor each time the color coded threat level goes up. From my observations at a large company, I would think he gets quite a bit of push back from them because of the money issues involved with raising the color threat level. Hey, let's just face it -- that whole system is incredibly flawed. http://www.pscommllc.com/news/hill_john_oped.htmlquade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tunaplanet 0 #8 July 14, 2004 Quotethat whole system is incredibly flawed. Yeah. How dare them give us warning that thousands of americans may perish in a terrorist attack. Horrible system. Forty-two Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #9 July 14, 2004 Quote Yeah. How dare them give us warning that thousands of americans may perish in a terrorist attack. Horrible system. Ok, let's go with that . . . Look at the five levels and tell me if you can seriously imagine a time where the entire United States will ever be either totally "green" or totally "red". And that's just one of many, many basic flaws.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tunaplanet 0 #10 July 14, 2004 Ok. Green is fairly simple. That isn't hard to imagine. Simply put, nothing on the boards of the NSA, DIA, CIA, FBI and military intel. Red? That one is tricky. With my military background I could toss you a few hypothetical scenarios. Here's one. Acting on an intel report, SEAL Team 8 raids a house in Afghanistan. They detain 3 tangos. During a physical interrogation one of the tangos says Al Queda has 2 men in New York with a suitcase nuke that is 22 x 12 x 6 inches. The men have been in NY for 2 weeks and plan on detonating it in 8 hours. The other two men being interrogated seperately states the same thing. Documents obtained in the house show supporting evidence after being de-crypted. Something of this nature would, in my opinon, qualify a red status. Forty-two Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tunaplanet 0 #11 July 14, 2004 Oh, and for those who aren't sure exactly of the 5 levels that me and Quade are referring to...here they are. Five Levels Of Terrorism Alert System The five levels of terrorism alerts outlined by the Department of Homeland Security, as well as recommended government and private-sector responses: HOMELAND SECURITY Below is the color scheme for the Homeland Security Advisory System. GREEN: (Low risk of terrorist attacks.) Refine and exercise planned protective measures. Ensure emergency personnel receive training. Assess facilities for vulnerabilities and take measures to reduce them. BLUE: (Guarded condition. General risk of terrorist attacks.) Check communications with designated emergency response or command locations. Review and update emergency response procedures. Provide the public with necessary information. YELLOW: (Elevated condition. Significant risk of terrorist attacks.) Increase surveillance of critical locations. Coordinate emergency plans with nearby jurisdictions. Assess further refinement of protective measures within the context of the current threat information. Implement, as appropriate, contingency and emergency response plans. ORANGE: (High risk of terrorist attacks.) Coordinate necessary security efforts with armed forces or law enforcement agencies. Take additional precaution at public events. Prepare to work at an alternate site or with a dispersed work force. Restrict access to essential personnel only. RED: (Severe risk of terrorist attacks.) Assign emergency response personnel and preposition specially trained teams. Monitor, redirect or constrain transportation systems. Close public and government facilities. Increase or redirect personnel to address critical emergency needs. Forty-two Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #12 July 14, 2004 Ok, and exactly how would that justify adding one additional deputy to the sherrif's office in Clear Lake, Iowa? See what I mean?quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #13 July 14, 2004 Please note that even this list of levels is flawed. They have the lowest level at the top and the highest level at the bottom. quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tunaplanet 0 #14 July 14, 2004 I'm going by the description of Red Status from the post I made above describing them. Red is the most extreme situation. The scenario I posted is an extreme scenario. Everything listed under the Red Status in my opinion would be suited for the scenario I gave. Forty-two Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tunaplanet 0 #15 July 14, 2004 QuoteThey have the lowest level at the top and the highest level at the bottom. LOL. Pretty funny. Forty-two Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tunaplanet 0 #16 July 15, 2004 QuoteOk, and exactly how would that justify adding one additional deputy to the sherrif's office in Clear Lake, Iowa? That is silly but it certainly doesn't hurt. You asked me to give you a scenario that would justify a Red Status. I believe what I gave you justifies as one. As far as what they do about it is another story. Forty-two Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #17 July 15, 2004 However, that's my entire point. The enitre country gets assigned ONE threat level. That's simply ludicrous. It's a completely flawed system.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tunaplanet 0 #18 July 15, 2004 It's not completely flawed. It has some loose bolts. For the most part it's very good. Forty-two Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhreeZone 20 #19 July 15, 2004 If we go to Orange alert, at work we bring in 4 additional security officers per facitly (22 facilities nationwide) to do laptop case/purse searches. In addition to that hand metal dectector wands are implemented also. All of this is from a temp agency that charges a nice premium for them to be there. The guys in accounting flipped the last time the Orange alert was up for so long.Yesterday is history And tomorrow is a mystery Parachutemanuals.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tunaplanet 0 #20 July 15, 2004 As silly as some people may think having these guys stand there that may be inexperienced...it is better than nothing. Me and Quade apparantly disagree on wether the system is overall good or not. I feel it is good in general. Quade feels it is pretty much useless. Who knows. Forty-two Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #21 July 15, 2004 >CIA's Acting Chief Says Threat Highest Since 9/11 by quade Not to worry! Bush himself made a speech a few days ago in which he told the US that we are safer now after invading Iraq. And who are you going to believe, anyway? The head of the CIA, or a guy who uses the information they provide? http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/07/13/1089694344659.html?oneclick=true Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #22 July 15, 2004 QuoteWe're not talking about quarters here. We're talking about millions of dollars in additional labor each time the color coded threat level goes up. From my observations at a large company, I would think he gets quite a bit of push back from them because of the money issues involved with raising the color threat level. Hey, let's just face it -- that whole system is incredibly flawed. http://www.pscommllc.com/news/hill_john_oped.html I have to agree with you here Quade. In fact, I think we should forget about increased security for the DNC Convention in Boston. Predictions are it will cost in excess of $146 million. That money could be better spent on health care. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tkhayes 348 #23 July 15, 2004 given the recent dilvusion of the CIA's pre-war intelligence, I do not put much weight into ANY of the so-called threats. I think they just like to keep us scared so we will do anything they say. More fear? More $$ for big corporations that ultimately get to raise prices and tighten security. All-in-all I am completely convinced that this is more and more about money and power, not about terrorism. Will we ever see green again? I doubt it. Have we had a terrorist attack since 9/11? No, TK Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #24 July 15, 2004 QuoteMe and Quade apparantly disagree on wether the system is overall good or not. I feel it is good in general. Quade feels it is pretty much useless. Not at all, Quade is using the time honored discussion where he sees a specific flaw he doesn't like and thus call the entire system 'useless'. This is used way too much in politics - arguing lack of absolute perfection in real world scenarios. As far as a single code for the country - it's a 'general' system - get over it, that's the intent. I'm sure that New York will get more attention than Clear Lake due to the specific intelligence, also the rest of the country -should- be on higher alert since 9/11 showed that multiple and coordinated attacks are in the capability of the terrorists - so if you know of the nuke in New York, you must assume other things will happen elsewhere. If you don't and fail, then the whole "we didn't do EVERYTHING we could have done" and the "what did we know and when did we know it" rhetoric will fly. Goofy - Personally I don't like the concept, it's a show for the masses rather than an effective communication agent, but the concept is still workable and something was done. And I also think that Green should come between Blue and Yellow, what's with that? It passes the science and the art common sense test - 'green is for go' is really stupid and arbitrary. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites