rgoper 0 #1 August 6, 2002 ....with higher ratings than the "Osbournes" i just saw it on good morning america, then went and spewed, now i'm back to post. she announced that her dog "sugar pie" is on prozac to keep her "balanced" she was awarded a reported 88 million dollars in a court settlement, but her ex-husband's son is appealing the decision, i hope she walks away with less than a dollar. she made an appeal for a man "with a job" to take her out and date her, citing that she could find no one who would date her. go figure. ugly white pig woman on dope! surely this podunk ho's show won't make it? YUK! --Richard-- "We Will Not Be Shaken By Thugs, And Terroist" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hobbes4star 0 #2 August 6, 2002 i saw a glimpse of it on the news. my god that woman must weight in about 200lbs now. damn i can't belive she was once in playboy....if fun were easy it wouldn't be worth having, right? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spy38W 0 #3 August 6, 2002 Quotei saw a glimpse of it on the news. my god that woman must weight in about 200lbs now. damn i can't belive she was once in playboy.... Really?? I wish I had seen this just because I keep hearing about it here, and from friends.. anybody have a link to the show, or what was it called? It's like a damned train wreck... -- Hook high, flare on time Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rgoper 0 #4 August 6, 2002 it's called "Anna" it airs on "E" i believe every monday evening at 8:00 p.m. heck, i don't know why i'm giving her air time out, you'll want to kill me when you see it! she's really gross. i just went to ETONLINE and found her link, feast your eyes on this! YUCH! http://www.etonline.com/television/a11658.htm--Richard-- "We Will Not Be Shaken By Thugs, And Terroist" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fasterfaller 0 #5 August 6, 2002 One good thing about that show is that you can be having a bad life and watch that show and say my life is not that bad . I bet she hits the 300# mark before long . I would not touch her if she had the 88 million . Ok I would marry her and then run off to the dz for the honeymoon and spend her money . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spy38W 0 #6 August 6, 2002 Quoteit's called "Anna" it airs on "E" i believe every monday evening at 8:00 p.m. heck, i don't know why i'm giving her air time out, you'll want to kill me when you see it! Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyuuuum! -- Hook high, flare on time Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BikerBabe 0 #7 August 6, 2002 Interesting... Question for all of you gentlemen: Do you think the women in the attached pictures are beautiful? Would you date them? Why or why not? I'm testing a hypothesis here...Never meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FliegendeWolf 0 #8 August 6, 2002 I'm not interested in dating anyone who can't hold an intelligent conversation. That's my primary criterion.A One that Isn't Cold is Scarcely a One at All Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fasterfaller 0 #9 August 6, 2002 Bikerbabe , I would be bored to tears with them . Way too much maint. costs involved and one looks too manly for my tastes . I prefer a plain jane type that lives to have fun . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deuce 1 #10 August 6, 2002 Yeah, Babe, When I was single I'd a gone out with any of them. Emme first. But if they couldn't maintain a conversation, forget it. It's amazing how often "Wow. Look at her!" is followed by "Wow. What a b*tch" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BikerBabe 0 #11 August 6, 2002 Good...y'all passed! Just kidding. Actually, replacing "date" with "do" might yield a more reliable study. But the point is, all of the women in those pictures are considered "plus-sized" Yep, even Marilyn...she wore a 16. I was testing to see if you really were as concerned about weight as the previous posts seem to imply. Granted, ANS isn't exactly a prime candidate over which to hold this debate, but the point is still valid. Sooo...can, in your opinion, a "plus-size" woman BE gorgeous?Never meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Muenkel 0 #12 August 6, 2002 Quotei just went to ETONLINE and found her link, feast your eyes on this! Richard, I went to your link and much to my satisfaction, there was a picture of Jennifer Anniston in the upper right hand corner. Thanks! _________________________________________ Chris Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rgoper 0 #13 August 6, 2002 Richard, I went to your link and much to my satisfaction, there was a picture of Jennifer Anniston in the upper right hand corner. Thanks!*** that certainly was the only highlight! it's not that she's all fat and ugly to me, but she's dumber than a rock, i'm sorry. anybody that would stoop to levels she has don't have "all their oars in the water" she makes me hurl! further, i think the only two places she could get laid, is in a prison, or a dog pound. --Richard-- "We Will Not Be Shaken By Thugs, And Terroist" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Muenkel 0 #14 August 6, 2002 You are referring to Anna Nicole, not Jennifer Aniston right? _________________________________________ Chris Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rgoper 0 #15 August 6, 2002 QuoteYou are referring to Anna Nicole, not Jennifer Aniston right? uh........YEAH! i'll refer to her as ANS from now on, or pigwoman, which do you like better? just curious! --Richard-- "We Will Not Be Shaken By Thugs, And Terroist" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Antithesis 0 #16 August 6, 2002 I didn't think that she was that big... . .. . But whoa! I travel the land, Work in the ocean, Play in the sky Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rgoper 0 #17 August 6, 2002 QuoteI didn't think that she was that big... . .. . But whoa! she said the other day on t.v. she wasn't allowed to eat over $600.00 of food a day, i thought......sheesh when she sits around the house....she sits AROUND the house! she also complained she had not had sex in two years, personally, i think her "assisstant" is licking her into a stupor induced coma, money can buy a LOT of mouthwash, BUT, she doesn't have the 88 mill just yet, so i don't think i'd be putting my mouth anywhere just yet! (or in her case...ever) YUKSTER!--Richard-- "We Will Not Be Shaken By Thugs, And Terroist" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Antithesis 0 #18 August 6, 2002 If she's eating $600.00 worth of food a day then he's getting fat from the tongue action alone. YUCK I travel the land, Work in the ocean, Play in the sky Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bbarnhouse 0 #19 August 6, 2002 Beautiful men and women on the exterior may be lovely too look at, but ever notice that if they are ugly on the inside how their appearance outwardly isn't so beautiful anymore? Just as someone that has a beautiful spirit also becomes beautiful in one's sight? Interesting eh? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rgoper 0 #20 August 6, 2002 QuoteJust as someone that has a beautiful spirit also becomes beautiful in one's sight? Interesting eh? not particularilary interesting, but profound just the same. it's one thing to be in a drug induced stupor, and tell all of your cute, depraved little secrets to the public in a forum such as she has chosen, and quite another yet to be in her position, and be a little more subtile. she's exposing herself to this critique, if she were making her own living, and weigh 900 pounds, she would be way more attractive than she is now. jeez-us, she's getting head on Howard Stern, and thinking it's funny........HELLO! --Richard-- "We Will Not Be Shaken By Thugs, And Terroist" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hobbes4star 0 #21 August 7, 2002 http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/020807/161/1zpna.html&e=1 here is another pic of herif fun were easy it wouldn't be worth having, right? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blondeflyer7 0 #22 August 7, 2002 That is definitely a very true statement!!!!! Couldn't have said it any better Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bbarnhouse 0 #23 August 7, 2002 Quotenot particularilary interesting rgoper....give me a break....profoundness IS interesting...... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jasmin 0 #24 August 7, 2002 Been there done that. Got to be a TV presenter for Nickelodeon for a little while. Filmed us 24/7. Not fun. You learn to hide from the cameras what you need to....but you still come off looking bad! No seriously, this is what happens when we make people famous ofr the wrong reasons. She didn't save lives, she didn't come up with a formula of notable intellectual value and she certainly doesn't come up looking good in cinema/tv! She got famous for tits that aren't real, for spreading her legs for money and photos, and for marrying a stupid idiot with more testosterone than brain cells. The fact that we took any notice of her in the first place is why we're being punished now! Touche! Mwaaaaaaahaaaaahaaaahaaa!xj "I wouldn't recommend picking a fight with the earth...but then I wouldn't recommend picking a fight with a car either, and that's having tried both." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rgoper 0 #25 August 7, 2002 the washed up boozehag was on AGAIN tonight with the same two shows from the other night. by the way, it's dubbed "The Anna Nichole Show" it stars her, her son, her LAWYER, and her stoopid ass mutt "sugar pie" ((give me a break)) i turned the channel and tuned to "The Osbournes" the shows were from last season, but it beat the shit out of ANS! she' a P.I.G.--Richard-- "We Will Not Be Shaken By Thugs, And Terroist" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
