0
slotperfect

Rocket Guy

Recommended Posts

I spent 20 minutes on the site reading and if the Air pistons fire right and the fins work... the trials to 15000 might actually work... it think it will need more fuel then his calculations though...
Yesterday is history
And tomorrow is a mystery

Parachutemanuals.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I met this guy at Symposium in Jan '01 in San Diego. He's not
> nuts . . .

The compressed-air 'boosters' worry me. I've seen similar designs on other booster proposals, and they're often a band-aid for a poor propellant ratio. In addition, the recovery system, as far as I can tell, has four deployment stages - and they have to function from vacuum to 15psi. That's more complex than any other vehicle I know of; even more complex than the X-38, the proposed (and now cancelled) ISS escape vehicle. They actually did some drop tests with the X-38 and discovered problems with the ram-air. (Bill Gargano worked on the system; for some really cool pics check out http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/gallery/photo/X-38/)

I have no doubt you could make all this work, but I'd be very curious as to how much all the drop testing would cost. Another alternative would be to use something like an F-111 escape module (http://www.fb-111a.net/Module.html) which is already designed for the purpose, and are easy to come by.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0