skreamer 1 #1 December 18, 2002 I might not be AOL's biggest fan, but boy am I happy about this victory in court. It might not affect the amount of spam I receive but it is good to know that companies responsible for spam are being held accountable (where possible). Will Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheBile 0 #2 December 18, 2002 I wonder if we can start sueing Post Whores for the same reasons. Gerb I stir feelings in others they themselves don't understand. KA'CHOW ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freeflir29 0 #3 December 18, 2002 Way to go AOL!!! Finally a "good" lawsuit. Don't see those very often. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skreamer 1 #4 December 18, 2002 I don't think there is much point in suing Clay - I think he has even less money than me.. (which is zero) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fudd 0 #5 December 18, 2002 I recently found this great idea on the net. I'll try to get one of these up on my site to. There are only 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jfields 0 #6 December 18, 2002 Oh, that IS funny. Both legal and deliciously ironic. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest #7 December 18, 2002 I was reading recently (and may have seen it here on dz.com) about a spammer in the Midwest whose name and meatspace address were published on the Internet. He's being bombarded with unsolicited snail mail (bogus subscriptions and the like). He's retaliating by suing the anti-spammers that published his information. BTW none of this is anectdotal: spammer part 1 spammer part 2 "The mouse does not know life until it is in the mouth of the cat." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
