One way to look at tax cuts...

[Gawain 0]

This is a bit lengthy, but it provides an excellent perspective. I'm sure that it will tick some off to no end.. Just remember, when was the last time you were hired for a job by a poor person?

---

An interesting explanation of why most of the tax cuts go to "the wealthy."

Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner.

The bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men--the poorest--would pay nothing;
The fifth would pay $1;
The sixth would pay $3;
The seventh $7;
The eighth $12;
The ninth $18;
The tenth man--the richest--would pay $59.

That's what they decided to do. The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement-until one day, the owner threw them a curve.

"Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20."

So now dinner for the ten only cost $80. The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes.

So the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free. But what about the other six-the paying customers?

How could they divvy up the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his "fair share?"

The six men realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would end up being *paid* to eat their meal.

So the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same rate and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so the fifth man paid nothing, the sixth pitched in $2, the seventh paid $5, the eighth paid $9, the ninth paid $12, leaving the tenth man with a bill of $52 instead of his earlier $59.

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to eat for free.

But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man.

He pointed to the tenth. "But he got $7!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got seven times more than me!"

"That's true!" shouted the seventh man.

"Why should he get $7 back when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night he didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They were $52 short!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college instructors, is how the tax system works.

The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction.

Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore.

So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

[bmcd308 0]

This should provoke some interesting commentary from the libs.

BMcD...

----------------------------------
www.jumpelvis.com

[jfields 0]

Nice analogy. But you missed one factor.

The nice restauranteur that offered the cost cut on the meal forgot to take into account the cost of his food, labor, rent, bombing of foriegn countries, etc. So the reduced $80 meal actually cost him $98 to get onto the table.

But because he is stubborn and his customers now expect it, he continues giving $98 meals for $80. Instead of charging $100 and pocketing $2/meal for a rainy day, he loses $18 per meal. Eventually, the poor guy goes bankrupt.

The diners are still hungry, and want their below-cost meal. So they find the former owner of the restaurant, chop him up, and eat him.

I love economics!

[billvon 3,120]

>The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a
> tax reduction.

This is true no matter what kind of tax break you get. The rich always pay more taxes to begin with, so any reduction benefits them the most in terms of absolute reduction.

To make your example more valid for the current case, though, you'd have to change the example so that the rich guy gets all $20 of the reduction (dividend taxes completely removed) and everyone gets less food (programs get cut.)