0
billvon

Don't believe everything you read

Recommended Posts

Quote

Soldiers die in wars. If an army's first priority was keeping the troops as safe as possible, then they wouldn't be fighting at all



or by keeping them out of helicopters...
I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, I have to admit, that dirty people who look for causes because they don't really have any can be funny. But that doesn't devalue a cause, just because someone funny is for it...

Wendy
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

1. Saddam may well have been killed in the first night's surprise attack



I find it ironic that your number one was not a stated fact.

Heck, you even left it intact in that he may well have been killed.

Do we honestly have solid proof that he is still alive?
It's your life, live it!
Karma
RB#684 "Corcho", ASK#60, Muff#3520, NCB#398, NHDZ#4, C-33989, DG#1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Do we honestly have solid proof that he is still alive?



Dubya says he's alive, which is good enough to prove Bill's point that we shouldn't be so quick to believe the stories as they first come out.

_Am
__

You put the fun in "funnel" - craichead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Do we honestly have solid proof that he is still alive?



Dubya says he's alive, which is good enough to prove Bill's point that we shouldn't be so quick to believe the stories as they first come out.

_Am



Yah, but no one believes George when he says Sadham has chemical weapons he is hiding so why believe Bush when he says SH is still alive? Bush could be lieing since if SH was dead then many might say the regime has been removed and we should pull out and stop bombing.

Chew on that one for awhile. I'll get back to y'all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Do we honestly have solid proof that he is still alive?



Dubya says he's alive, which is good enough to prove Bill's point that we shouldn't be so quick to believe the stories as they first come out.

_Am



I'm not saying he's dead.

I'm not saying he's alive either.

I'm saying we do not know now, nor did we then, if he is alive or dead, which is exactly what Bill posted as his number 1.

There is nothing to believe, or not believe for that matter, with his number one.
It's your life, live it!
Karma
RB#684 "Corcho", ASK#60, Muff#3520, NCB#398, NHDZ#4, C-33989, DG#1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I'm saying we do not know now, nor did we then, if he is alive or
>dead, which is exactly what Bill posted as his number 1.

Right, but listening to the news at that point would lead one to believe that there was good evidence (not proof, but evidence) that he'd been killed. In hindsight, the only evidence they had was someone being removed in a stretcher. Like I said, don't believe everything you see on the news.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Do we honestly have solid proof that he is still alive?



Dubya says he's alive, which is good enough to prove Bill's point that we shouldn't be so quick to believe the stories as they first come out.

_Am



Most stories do have a spin on them. Most stories have an element of fact. Then, by omitting other facts, the story can be given a slant that will aid the side of whatever faction is telling it. I don't believe that this is the technique of only GWB.

People have to give all news items some examination. I don't believe that the successor to SH will be much better. However, perhaps some of the oil money that he is receiving will be distributed in a fashion that will help the people, not just enrich his personal coffers like SH has done. According to UN figures, the mortality rate for children in Iraq has skyrocketed while his mansions and palaces have multiplied.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>According to UN figures, the mortality rate for children in Iraq has
>skyrocketed while his mansions and palaces have multiplied.

Mortality rates skyrocketed after the first gulf war; they dropped dramatically once the infrastructure was repaired and we started the oil-for-food program.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If for example you take the gross receipts for the last week of January this year, Iraq was getting in the range of $400 million dollars (gross) per week. Admittedly, the price of oil fluctuates, and the 'allowed' production varied. However, where did all of the money go over time? For 'food and medical' supplies or to Saddam's war machine? And of the portion that truly went to those in need, I'll wager that the lion's share went to groups that were devoutly loyal to Saddam's regime and supported it in various ways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0