0
kevin922

So Rodney King was a victim right?

Recommended Posts

everyone forgive my idiocy, I misread basically everything up here. I just finished a debate and a paper and yada yada yada I've got drain bamage.

peace
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To the long forgotten origins of this thread, King was never a victim. He attacked police officers after being hit twice with volleys of 50,000 volts from dart-stun guns. He ran at a police officer. The officer he ran at made a mistake, in my opinion, by not taking one power stroke to knock King out, and thereby eliminating the need to hit him lightly for the next 19 seconds. Unfortunately, the tape does not show the cause of the ensuing action. It only shows King midway through his charge at a cop and the cop swinging wildly with his baton.

King should be in jail. 54 people died and 2,000 were injured because he resisted arrest and some schmuck caught part of it on tape. Fuckers.>:(


mike

Girls only want boyfriends who have great skills--You know, like nunchuk skills, bow-hunting skills, computer-hacking skills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

King should be in jail.



Agreed.

Quote

54 people died and 2,000 were injured because he resisted arrest and some schmuck caught part of it on tape.



False. The deaths and injuries were caused by other people's disregard for civility and lack of common sense. He didn't make them do it. People lost control and caused the commotion that resulted in fatalities. Had they maintained their composure, the riots wouldn't have happened.

King, the police and the rioters are all at fault. I feel bad for the innocent people that got hurt just for being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Wrong!

If King wouldn't have resisted, none of it ever would have happened.



So you are saying he is personally responsible for the actions of hundreds/thousands of other people? They aren't responsible for their own and have no free will? He made them do it?

I agree that his actions acted as a catalyst, but nothing says when one person throws a fit an entire city must follow. It was a widespread lapse in judgement. Note that I'm not saying he was innocent, just that parties other than him were also guilty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am by no means removing responsibility from the rioters, nor am I releasing the police from hitting him in the wrong places too many times. I am saying without his original actions, none of this would have happened.

mike

Girls only want boyfriends who have great skills--You know, like nunchuk skills, bow-hunting skills, computer-hacking skills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I am by no means removing responsibility from the rioters, nor am I releasing the police from hitting him in the wrong places too many times. I am saying without his original actions, none of this would have happened.



Well..... DUH!! ;)


Quote

Funny, I've always said it was because some people are fucking stupid and shouldn't be allowed to breed...



Yeah. What AggieDave said. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I am saying without his original actions, none of this would have happened.



If the gas powered automobile was never invented he wouldn't have been in a high speed chase and it wouldn't have happened either. I think Sublime had a good interpretation of the real reason for the riot..

Cause everybody in the hood has had it up to here
It's getting harder, and harder, and harder each and every year
Some kids went in a store with their mother
I saw her when she came out she was gettin' some Pampers
They said it was for the black man
They said it was for the mexican
But not for the white man
But if you look at the streets, it wasn't about Rodney King
It's this fucked-up situation and these fucked-up police
It's about comin' up and stayin' on top
And screamin' 187 on a mother fuckin' cop
It's ain't in the paper, it's on the wall
National guard
Smoke from all around
Give me my share, my share.
Gimme my share, I want it.
Gimme my share, I need it now, I need it now.
My share.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

My sign is I95 North...

As in hop on I95 North untill you see signs for Philadelphia and head to Skydive Crosskeys for the MonkeyClaw boogie in May!!!;)

Unless you were talking about astrology, in which case I am a Taurus.



Or you could just follow the smell of his ass coming from a jump plane :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Always searching for some new way to placate ourselves into thinking
> we're not monsters, but fine and good, upstanding members of the
> human global society.

I think all people have a need to do this - they need to validate their own actions, morals and beliefs. Everyone wants to think they're good, and everyone believes, in some deep down part of themselves, that if everyone was just like them things would be much better.

>You take away his identity, and tell him to find it by denying his
>instincts rather than working around them. You tell him to grow up,
> get married, have children, and become a productive member of hs
> society at a vocation he's good at and finds rewards in. But like the
> courtly love of the Middle Ages, in practical terms, this does not
> happen save on the glossy shell of God Bless Mom and Apple Pie
> and Baseball Goodness.

I think it happens more often than you think. Some of us (I think most of us, here) are pretty good at taking our drives, even sometimes those drives that are deadly, antisocial or impractical, and _using_ those drives to do something we want to do. We want to go really fast, we learn to fly small canopies, or we race dirtbikes. We want to jump out of airplanes and we learn to do it safely. We want to beat people up and we learn Tae Kwon Do, and spar with people. And rather than deny those drives they are expressed far more effectively than a drunk in a bar who goes around and picks fights.

Is our way of expressing our drives always socially acceptable? No, but I think most of us don't care.

>Beaver Cleaver and Wally are feeling each other up in the dark of
> night. Ward is dominating June in the bedroom, because he feels
> empowered there, and if June grits her teeth and bears it (or even,
> by virtue of what said society has done to her gender, believes she
> deserves it or even likes it... which are infinitely more self
>-depricating and damaging to herself, as well as any young females
> she may encounter and influnce) . . .

There are women who like to be dominated. There are _men_ who like to be dominated. The key is finding someone who meshes with your own drives, someone who is looking for their counterpart to do whatever it is they want to do. And when two people like that find each other, it's far from a deprecating or damaging experience. I've found that skydivers are less likely to shy away from experiences like that than most people, which is a good thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Unfortunately, the tape does not show the cause of the ensuing
> action. It only shows King midway through his charge at a cop and
> the cop swinging wildly with his baton.

Just as unfortunately, it shows police beating a man who is on the ground. No amount of spin is going to demonstrate how that was a neccessary response.

>King should be in jail. 54 people died and 2,000 were injured
> because he resisted arrest and some schmuck caught part of it on
> tape.

That's like saying that 3000 people died in the WTC disaster because of Bush's foreign policy. The terrorists who flew the planes killed those people, just as the rioters caused all that death and destruction. Blame the right people, at least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, what a reply.

Are you saying that society is fucked up, that we are being brainwashed to behave in ways that are alien to our basic animal instincts? The ability to reason, and the ability to use that reason to change our instinctive behaviour is what makes us humans different from all the other animals, you could even argue that if we did not use this ability we suppressing our true instincts, this would be against nature.

Tribes have not gone away, they have got way bigger, they are called nations, special interest groups, communities, dz.commers, we tend to drift from one to another and most of us belong to more than one, they give us a sense of belonging.

We may not hunt for food any more, but we still hunt for other things, money being the foremost.

We still act very much like we are told we did when we were still living in trees, (if you believe the historians and anthropolists), it's just that we have different tools to do them with.

Why did I bother with this??

Anyway I'm off to find my female and dominate her for the rest of the evening :ph34r::ph34r::ph34r:, and in the morning I will go to work and resume bugslaying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0