lawrocket 3 #1 July 23, 2003 They debate prolonging passing the budget for political gain. I particularly despise some of the comments (in a transcript) referring to how to make the California citizens suffer so they can have a ballot initiative to end the requirement of supermajority to increase taxes. This is why I hate the California Government. Recall Davis? No. Recall everybody... http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030723/ap_on_re_us/california_budget_11 Quote SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Unaware that a live microphone was broadcasting their words around the Capitol, Assembly Democrats meeting behind closed doors debated prolonging California's budget crisis for political gain. Members of the coalition of liberal Democrats talked about slowing progress on the budget as a means of increasing pressure on Republicans. A microphone had been left on during the closed meeting Monday, and the conversation was transmitted to about 500 "squawk boxes" that enable staff members, lobbyists and reporters to listen in on legislative meetings. Some members of the group, including Assemblywoman Jackie Goldberg, said if the budget crisis were extended, it could improve chances for a ballot initiative that would make it easier for the Democrats to raise taxes by lowering the threshold for passage from two-thirds to 55 percent. "No one is running" for re-election, she said, according to a transcript made by Republicans. "And maybe you end up better off than you would have, and maybe you don't. But what you do is show people that you can't get to this without a 55 percent vote." Assembly Republican Leader Dave Cox said that he was disappointed that Democrats would consider using the budget crisis to their political advantage. Assembly Speaker Herb Wesson, a Democrat, tried to brush aside criticism of the meeting, calling it a "bull session" that didn't have much significance. "For anyone, Democrat or Republican, to think there is some political advantage in this crisis, I think they are wrong," he said. Goldberg said her comments were part of a larger discussion about whether it would be better to make deeper cuts this year to give taxpayers a taste of how bad things would be without a tax increase. "It meant whether or not we do the things this year or next year that let the public understand how serious the situation is," Goldberg said. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #3 July 23, 2003 I'm sure politicians elsewhere are much much bter and are not motivated by their own interests......Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sebazz1 2 #4 July 23, 2003 Yeah but we call them other things than Fruits 'n Nuts elsewhere... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #5 July 23, 2003 I guess you Californians are quite the polite bunch! lolRemster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
