Recommended Posts
Don't worry, I understand. My mom is a hospice nurse and is going thru the stuff with me.
"...just an earthbound misfit, I."
"...just an earthbound misfit, I."
JohnnyD 0
QuoteDon't worry, I understand. My mom is a hospice nurse and is going thru the stuff with me.
Wow. Cheers to mom. That is one tough job.
ltdiver 3
There was a case back in the late 1980's that sparked this same debate. It was involving a woman, Nancy Cruzan who had been in a single car crash where she was thrown from the vehicle and lay face down in 2 inches of water and drowned.
A passer by, just a few minutes later, came to her 'aid' and did CPR and revived her. For the next 7 years she remained in a vegetative state, hooked up to life support.
Her family fought to have life support removed, and after a decade+ won the right. The feeding tube had to remain in, though.
The day arrived that the life support was indeed removed (after a multitude of court battles) and they waited for this woman to cease breathing. ALL the staff were amazed when she continued to breath...and her heart continued to beat! She continued to 'live'. But, sadly, in a persistant vegetative state.
The court battles that ensued thereafter were heart rending. The feeding tube removal the issue. The family wanted it removed. The 'state' did not.
Then came to the forefront, the definition of 'true brain death'. Higher brain death vs lower brain death. The medical field's definition was that death occured ONLY when the heart stopped beating.
Here is a paper that might explain it. I, for one, would want to be let go if my 'higher brain' or cortex were to be determined by PET scan to be non-functional. The 'lower brain' or brain stem can continue to function....and the heart will beat, the lungs will function. But, there are no brain waves. THIS CAN BE DETERMINED. Read Here.
ltdiver
edit to include Nancy Cruzan's name
Don't tell me the sky's the limit when there are footprints on the moon
A passer by, just a few minutes later, came to her 'aid' and did CPR and revived her. For the next 7 years she remained in a vegetative state, hooked up to life support.
Her family fought to have life support removed, and after a decade+ won the right. The feeding tube had to remain in, though.
The day arrived that the life support was indeed removed (after a multitude of court battles) and they waited for this woman to cease breathing. ALL the staff were amazed when she continued to breath...and her heart continued to beat! She continued to 'live'. But, sadly, in a persistant vegetative state.
The court battles that ensued thereafter were heart rending. The feeding tube removal the issue. The family wanted it removed. The 'state' did not.
Then came to the forefront, the definition of 'true brain death'. Higher brain death vs lower brain death. The medical field's definition was that death occured ONLY when the heart stopped beating.
Here is a paper that might explain it. I, for one, would want to be let go if my 'higher brain' or cortex were to be determined by PET scan to be non-functional. The 'lower brain' or brain stem can continue to function....and the heart will beat, the lungs will function. But, there are no brain waves. THIS CAN BE DETERMINED. Read Here.
ltdiver
edit to include Nancy Cruzan's name
Don't tell me the sky's the limit when there are footprints on the moon
Hazarrd 1
i gotta say, i dont see any reason to make this woman suffer any longer. its sad that she has to die like that, but she will be in a better place in 2 weeks.
p.s. anyone know why it takes 2 weeks for her to pass on once the tube is taken out? you would think it would be much sooner.
.-.
p.s. anyone know why it takes 2 weeks for her to pass on once the tube is taken out? you would think it would be much sooner.

.-.
ltdiver 3
The Ethical Debate
It's worth having a 'Living Will' written and legally filed, to have -your- wishes adhered to.
A Gift from the Cruzan Family. A guide in how to go about making -your- will known.
ltdiver
edit to add link for information
Don't tell me the sky's the limit when there are footprints on the moon
It's worth having a 'Living Will' written and legally filed, to have -your- wishes adhered to.
A Gift from the Cruzan Family. A guide in how to go about making -your- will known.
ltdiver
edit to add link for information
Don't tell me the sky's the limit when there are footprints on the moon
HeatherB 0
Well, Terri Schiavo's feeding tube has been put back in place, after almost a week without it:
http://news.tbo.com/news/MGA2H2BV2MD.html
What a mess.
http://news.tbo.com/news/MGA2H2BV2MD.html
What a mess.
Luv2Fall 0
I wonder if there has been any damage to her organs from the last week.......
Tonto 1
I voted unplug, and if the same happens to me I'd hope my parents know me well enough (we've had "the chat") to unplug me.
t
t
It's the year of the Pig.
turtlespeed 226
So...let me get this strait. You have the right to kill your unborn child that has a potential life in front of them, but a woman that is a vegtable, and has been for 12 years, has more rights.
Tell me if I'm missing something.
Tell me if I'm missing something.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun
AndyMan 7
The poll options suck, so I didn't vote.
It's not my call if it should be removed or not. I can't make that judgement, after all I've only read about her condition through the media.
That said, the govenor should not make the decision.
The state legislature should not make that decision.
The courts should not make that decision.
The family is the only ones who should make that decision. Since they're conflicted, the decision lies with the closest family member.
The courts should assist the family by establishing the pecking order. Is the husband the closest relative or the parents?
_Am
It's not my call if it should be removed or not. I can't make that judgement, after all I've only read about her condition through the media.
That said, the govenor should not make the decision.
The state legislature should not make that decision.
The courts should not make that decision.
The family is the only ones who should make that decision. Since they're conflicted, the decision lies with the closest family member.
The courts should assist the family by establishing the pecking order. Is the husband the closest relative or the parents?
_Am
__
You put the fun in "funnel" - craichead.
You put the fun in "funnel" - craichead.
Luv2Fall 0
What are you talking about? I've neither stated nor implied anything of that nature.
Jayruss 0
QuoteUnder the measure Bush signed into law Tuesday, Terri Schiavo will soon be appointed a new guardian by the Pinellas Circuit Court to review her case and make recommendations.
This is the worse part, shouldn't her husband be in charge, isn't that a right of marriage that she willingly gave him when they married? I'd hope that my SO would do the right thing in a place like this. In legal battles a spouse has higher standings than parents.
__________________________________________________
"Beware how you take away hope from another human being."
-Oliver Wendell Holmes
turtlespeed 226
QuoteWhat are you talking about? I've neither stated nor implied anything of that nature.
I never said you did.
The comment wasn't directed at you personaly, it was general.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun
Luv2Fall 0
Understood.......but check out your reference line......you usually reply to whom you are referring. I get emails stating you replied to me.
Throw me off for a sec.......
Throw me off for a sec.......

turtlespeed 226
Not replying to you personaly Luv2fall, but the question still stands.
Why are we allowed to take a life of a person, artificially, that hasn't had the chance to live yet, but then a life that has lived, but cannot do so on it's own MUST be spared.
Where is the logic?
Why are we allowed to take a life of a person, artificially, that hasn't had the chance to live yet, but then a life that has lived, but cannot do so on it's own MUST be spared.
Where is the logic?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun
Luv2Fall 0
I don't know really...........the logic in that isn't too sound to me....no rhyme nor reason relative to question as a whole. On a personal note, I don't believe in abortions either.
For this particular lady.....I have extremely mixed feelings...........tube being pulled, who is to say she will not suffer from hunger, etc.....extremely delicate call.
For this particular lady.....I have extremely mixed feelings...........tube being pulled, who is to say she will not suffer from hunger, etc.....extremely delicate call.
skycat 0
QuoteQuoteUnder the measure Bush signed into law Tuesday, Terri Schiavo will soon be appointed a new guardian by the Pinellas Circuit Court to review her case and make recommendations.
This is the worse part, shouldn't her husband be in charge, isn't that a right of marriage that she willingly gave him when they married? I'd hope that my SO would do the right thing in a place like this. In legal battles a spouse has higher standings than parents.
If it's true that he is engaged to another woman and has a child with her. Also, if it's true that there is a malpractice suit settlement that is pending her death. Then I wonder where his loyalties really lie.
Fly it like you stole it!
Be careful about getting a DNR. I don't think that is something you want until you are in hospice or are already very sick.
Example: You get in a car wreck and are badly injured. You are in the hospital in critical condition and the medical staff is made aware of the DNR. Even though you may still recover to a reasonable quality of life, they would not attempt to revive you should the situation arise.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites