Jib 0 #1 October 28, 2003 Why can't I get invited to parties like this: http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/invest/extra/P64581.asp New York prosecutors showed about 20 minutes of video footage from the 2001 party that cost $2.1 million -- about half paid by Tyco -- and featured singer Jimmy Buffett, gladiators, chariots and an ice sculpture of Michelangelo's David spewing vodka from his penis... But Judge Michael Obus ruled that jurors wouldn't see footage of the ice sculpture or a birthday cake in the shape of a woman's breasts with sparklers mounted on top. -------------------------------------------------- the depth of his depravity sickens me. -- Jerry Falwell, People v. Larry Flynt Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #2 October 28, 2003 From a legal perspective it makes perfect sense that the judge didn't allow the most salacious stuff in. That stuff about the statue and the "BOOBIE" cake would add nothing but to give rise to the temperament of the jury. NExt party liek that, though, I wanna know about. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yardhippie 0 #3 October 28, 2003 I once went to a shindig thrown by Genie industries at Sea World, after hours, everything free and featured a private showing of "shamoo" (or what ever whale took his place), and a doobie Bros. concert! Goddam dirty hippies piss me off! ~GFD "What do I get for closing your rig?" ~ me "Anything you want." ~ female skydiver Mohoso Rodriguez #865 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #4 October 29, 2003 I'm sure the R rated version of that video has made it to the net already.. anyone gota link? lolRemster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #5 October 29, 2003 QuoteFrom a legal perspective it makes perfect sense that the judge didn't allow the most salacious stuff in. That stuff about the statue and the "BOOBIE" cake would add nothing but to give rise to the temperament of the jury. NExt party liek that, though, I wanna know about. Since the defense is arguing that the party was strictly a business affair, I would think the cake and the ice-sculpture were highly pertinent in illustrating the nature of the "business"... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #6 October 29, 2003 I like this from one of the defense counsels who said that Kozlowski "basically was clueless." Nice attribute in a company CEO.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
