quade 4 #26 October 29, 2003 QuoteOK, so what is this one? Here is an example. The more current and "sophisticated models now are in the shape of Mickey Mouse and Buzz Lightyear. Please see heinous attachment.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sinker 0 #27 October 29, 2003 it's amazing to me that someone can make millions off of such a frivolous product. -the artist formerly known as sinker Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kennedy 0 #28 October 29, 2003 You gotta be shitting me. He got rich off of THAT? That's as bad as pet rocks. [did anyone ever really get rich off of pet rocks?] And I only google if I have time and actaully give a sh!t.witty subliminal message Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards. 1* Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wildblue 7 #29 October 29, 2003 Quoteit's amazing to me that someone can make millions off of such a frivolous product. Ever heard of the pet rock? I have an even better idea... although I can't disclose it just yet....it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #30 October 29, 2003 QuoteI have an even better idea Do you want my credit card number now? Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #31 October 29, 2003 The Me-163 Komet used H2O2 as a propellant. Apparently the fuel lines were right behind the pilot. I remember reading somewhere that some of the pilots were horribly disfigured by it. One tale said that an unfortunate flier, doused with the highly corrosive chemical, literally dissolved in his seat. I know that H2O2 in concentrations above 30 percent is enough to easily flay off skin. So, I wouldn't doubt it is used in explosive concentrations of 90 percent. I'd rather have the end come from a 5000 psi explosion. I think it would be quicker. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
goose491 0 #32 October 29, 2003 QuoteQuoteLots more thrust without much more complication. It would be, however, quite a bit more hazardous. Hydrogen Peroxide in the required concentration is pretty nasty stuff. That's what you pick out to bee more hazardous??? Not the liquid nitrogen suggested in option 1? Heheh, the pressurized water idea has been bounced around ever since the X-prize was suggested (at least, that's the first time I heard of it) My Karma ran over my Dogma!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #33 October 29, 2003 Hmmm, maybe I've just had too much exposure to LN2 for entertainment purposes and only -think- it's pretty safe. I guess it all depends on what you're used to.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
leroydb 0 #34 October 29, 2003 Quote Likewise, there's the MAD machine. While it is meant to disorient the brain, it also teaches the eye-brain to fend off any "out of body" experience with nausea. hahahahaLeroy ..I knew I was an unwanted baby when I saw my bath toys were a toaster and a radio... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
