0
mikkey

Guantanamo captive may be freed

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

They get the rights that we agreed to for POW's under the Geneva Convention - the same rights we expect our POW's to be afforded.





Uuummm....I don't think we ever signed that....although we do try to follow it and are the first ones to jump up and down if our POW's don't get the benefits.



WRONG. Signed, ratified by the US Senate 2 August 1955, and therefore US law according to Article VI of the US Constitution.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Or we can ignore the Geneva conventions and just hold them forever - and our servicemen will be afforded the same treatment the next time _they_ are captured by someone.




There are plenty of arguments that say that is EXACTLY what has happened in MOST of our modern conflicts. Not saying that 2 wrongs make a right but....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Because we signed the Geneva Convention, and that means we have to treat them a certain way. That includes parts 70-72 about letting them communicate with the outside world (subject to censorship), part 118 about releasing them when hostilities against their country are concluded, and part 122 about maintaining and providing basic information about them (i.e. their names, ranks etc) to the outside world. It also means they are under no obligation to cooperate with their captors.

So what war are we still fighting? If we are holding Taliban we're under obligation to release them to the new government of Afghanistan. If we're going to claim they're all part of a vauge war on terror, which moves from country to country depending on who we're invading recently, then that's a dangerous precedent to set. And even if we _do_ do that we have to afford them the basic protections of POW's including the ability to communicate with the outside world.

Or we can ignore the Geneva conventions and just hold them forever - and our servicemen will be afforded the same treatment the next time _they_ are captured by someone. Easy to do, perhaps, if you're not the one at risk, but I think it's a mistake in the long run. We, of all people, should be supporting the treaties we agreed to follow.



There are people claiming that many of the prisoners were NOT caught on a battlefield carrying weapons, but "arrested" suspected to be supporters of Al Qaeda. This complicates the situation even further. AFAIK the US is unfortunately in breach of a number of international laws and convention and is only avoiding breaching its own constitution by placing the prisoners in GB.

I just find this very messy. If you want to claim to be the policeman in the world with any authority, you must keep the high ground on issues like this.

Many of the prisoners have citizenship in countries allied to the US. Due to the secrecy and lack of progress, people are starting to feel sorry for these prisoners even so they might not deserve it. They are also asking why their compatriots are being treated so much worse then US citizens. People feel that the US thinks it can play by it owns rule and that non-US citizens are less “worth”.

I do not think Americans understand how much anti-American sentiment has increased lately – also within countries that are traditional allies. The only way to stop this is to make the process more transparent, give the prisoners some basic legal rights and charge them. That might stop some of the “sympathy” if people know what the prisoners actually are alleged to have done.
---------------------------------------------------------
When people look like ants - pull. When ants look like people - pray.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Well, I do not expect the US to behave like this or we have to invade them....



Dude you guys already did.. The Road Warrior is over here... Croc Dundee...Nicole Kidman....not to mention the guy running all over the world turtuing poor helpless animals with his antics..I mean crikee;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
America should be about protecting freedom, justice and human rights. As long as even only a handful of prisoners in GB are innocently held it is a major embarrassment and disappointment if you believe in human rights and a fair justice systems.



Thanks for telling us what America should be about. I'm sure whoever appointed you as our spokesman knew what they were doing. What is Australia about?"



never pull low......unless you are

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

What do you say to people who get released after have beeing held in a high security facility for 2 years for no reason, no contact to a lawyer, no contact to family, no visits, no charges etc. etc..... "bad luck?"



well you hang with a$$holes, you end up in shit :P



When they raid a whore house, the piano player goes to jail too.



never pull low......unless you are

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow, that was great. Three quick posts spreading a little abuse and "well documented undeniable truths'" around and you have again made your "valuable" contribution to a discussion. Sic....
---------------------------------------------------------
When people look like ants - pull. When ants look like people - pray.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

....not to mention the guy running all over the world turtuing poor helpless animals with his antics..I mean crikee;)



C'mon, Steve the Croc Hunter is pretty cool! B|. I thoought of him as an exaggerated git until he said "oh lookie there. Crikey that's a big croc in the water. That one can TEAR UP A HUMAN with a single bite. I am gonna pay 'im a vist"


"Ooooh, he's a bit cranky, ain't he?"

That sold me right there on the spot :P

Santa Von GrossenArsch
I only come in one flavour
ohwaitthatcanbemisunderst

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The BBC has a serious credibility problem



So does Tony Blair. Plaigarising a ten year old thesis as intelligence and jumping up and down about WMD that are deployable in 45 minutes only to find that was not the case.
The BBC reported the incorrect validation of a Prime Minister leading a country to war and they were proven correct. Lets throw a weapons expert to the press and try and let our other problems slide shall we?
I see the credibility problem being in government not in the BBC. Strange things happen when a journalist actually tries to hold a government accountable.

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

There has been a well-researched BBC documentary on him and others held by the US.



The BBC has a serious credibility problem.



I'd believe the BBC before FOX or Rush L. any and every day of the week.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


America should be about protecting freedom, justice and human rights. As long as even only a handful of prisoners in GB are innocently held it is a major embarrassment and disappointment if you believe in human rights and a fair justice systems.



Thanks for telling us what America should be about. I'm sure whoever appointed you as our spokesman knew what they were doing. What is Australia about?"



Wow Rick, you just hopped in here and flung sh*t at peeps with three posts in a row... do you have something worthwhile to contribute?

Sheesh! Is America not about protecting freedom, justice and human rights? -Or at least trying to imply that that's what it's all about? - Are you really rebutting this?

Australia is about Fosters beer and Crocodile wrestling [giggle] but it doesn't change the fact that GB is an embarrassment and disappointment to all that which the US claims it stands for.

Freedom ain't free... apparently, it only comes at the expense of the freedom of others.



My Karma ran over my Dogma!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

What do you say to people who get released after have beeing held in a high security facility for 2 years for no reason, no contact to a lawyer, no contact to family, no visits, no charges etc. etc..... "bad luck?"



well you hang with a$$holes, you end up in shit :P



When they raid a whore house, the piano player goes to jail too.



Yeah, and then what happens:

They question the piano player.. if he's clean, he get released... if he was good about the whole thing... they say: "Sorry about the inconvienience piano player, you hang with a$$holes, you end up in shit... Now get out of here and stop playing at that whore house".


And now, what doesn't happen:

They hold the piano player for two years, in a 'camp' with a bag over his head. Claiming "We aint' telling you what he did... but he problly did it!"



My Karma ran over my Dogma!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

WRONG. Signed, ratified by the US Senate 2 August 1955, and therefore US law according to Article VI of the US Constitution.



began in 1882, with Clara Barton pushing the US to sign the orginal draft from 1864, but yes we are a signatory nation.

How does that affect that we never declared war on a country while in Afganistan, just on terror? I guess that it would kind of be like the US soldiers in Vietnam being able to carry shotguns, even though they are outlawed under the Convention, but at the time Vietnam was not a war but considered a police action with no formal declaration of war. Loophole?

I'm not afriad of dying, I'm afraid of never really living- Erin Engle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Wow, that was great. Three quick posts spreading a little abuse and well documented undeniable truths around and you have again made your valuable contribution to a discussion. Sic....



glad you agree,

all three of his posts seem dead on to me, glad some one is brave enough to take a stand against the rest of the world being pissed at the big kid on the block

I'm not afriad of dying, I'm afraid of never really living- Erin Engle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Sheesh! Is America not about protecting freedom, justice and human rights? -Or at least trying to imply that that's what it's all about? - Are you really rebutting this?



Yes it is, but at what point does the absudity of having everyone in teh geopolotic criticize the US for it butting into everyones business and then some one dictates what the US should be doing, I for one am an American with a very old view, pre Great War if you like, isolationism, I say we bring home all our trroops, pu them on the beaches here, open the oil field in the Mid west back up, (which didn't run out they were just closed so that when the Gulf gets low, we have the National Reserve) and let the world handle its own problems, mudslide in Brazil, better ask the all knowing OZ for those liitle care packages cuz you and I both now that the UN is an outdated, institution. Then see how long this America bashing lasts.

Bring em home, for good

I'm not afriad of dying, I'm afraid of never really living- Erin Engle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>glad some one is brave enough to take a stand against the rest of
> the world being pissed at the big kid on the block . . .

Yep! Thank god there are people brave enough to stand behind the bully, instead of being one of those cowards who stands up to him.

I understand your sentiment, but the allegory you used was opposite the one you intended, I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I for one am an American with a very old view, pre Great War if you like, isolationism, I say we bring home all our trroops, pu them on the beaches here, open the oil field in the Mid west back up, (which didn't run out they were just closed so that when the Gulf gets low, we have the National Reserve) and let the world handle its own problems,...




Here Here! That would be FAN-TAS-TIC!!!

The people you are speaking out against.... well, this is probably THERE argument... as in "Stop policing the planet" ???





Quote

Mudslide in Brazil, better ask the all knowing OZ for those liitle care packages cuz you and I both now that the UN is an outdated, institution. Then see how long this America bashing lasts.

Bring em home, for good



Well aint that coy?
The America Bashing won't last if you "Bring 'em Home"... do you see that's what has us "America Bashing"? You're arguing both sides of the debate here.



My Karma ran over my Dogma!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Well aint that coy?
The America Bashing won't last if you "Bring 'em Home"... do you see that's what has us "America Bashing"? You're arguing both sides of the debate here.



Watch your tone or when they all get them home, I 'll have to send them up there annex the great white north and teach you how to make good beer.:P

Really, though I do respect your opinion and all the others on this board, I hear all this anti Amercian dogma from people who don't live in the regions where America has helped and been appreciated.

Believe CNN, FNC, BBC, Sky, who ever you want, but I'll believe all my buds who have been over sees in a military role and how happy everyone is to see America role in. Even now the press want you to think that all Iraqi's are fed up with the US, but my bud who just rotated home, can't understand how if every one over there hated him how they planed to kill him, well maybe he did really need to get across the street and the impromptu crowds that gather around US troops to kiss their feet (yes you heard right) really hampered their goal to go get some goat milk. All I am saying is if the US steps out of world polotics, who is going to fill the void, or are the rest of you just mad cause my dad can kick your dad's ass?:P

I'm not afriad of dying, I'm afraid of never really living- Erin Engle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>All I am saying is if the US steps out of world polotics, who is going
> to fill the void . . .

You don't think there are plenty of squabbling nations that can make life as interesting as the US does for places like Iraq?

> or are the rest of you just mad cause my dad can
> kick your dad's ass?

I think that other countries are mad at the US because it often treats global diplomacy like a bully who kicks people's asses. Many people don't like bullies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bill, I am sure there are enough nations to create even more havoc, withou us, but sometimes it seems to me that people tend to forget that we as a nation do some pretty good things, and the void I meant was the humanitarian aid, the muscle to the UN peacekeeping forces (which our troops are nowhere near traind to do, they have a different prupose, and should not be asked to be policeman) and the economic support that we give other less of, nations.

And the other part was a joke, sort of

my grandma and your grandma
hanging out clothes
my grandma punched your grand ma
right samck in her nose
;)

I'm not afriad of dying, I'm afraid of never really living- Erin Engle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>but sometimes it seems to me that people tend to forget that we as
> a nation do some pretty good things, and the void I meant was the
> humanitarian aid . . .

I agree, although I think that in some cases the reason countries put up with us more than they otherwise would is because it keeps the money flowing.

>the muscle to the UN peacekeeping forces (which our troops are
> nowhere near traind to do, they have a different prupose, and
> should not be asked to be policeman)

I agree. We should support the UN militarily (i.e. for conflicts) and then rely on them for peacekeepers. If we had done that a year ago I think we'd be in much better shape todea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites