PhillyKev 0 #1 December 11, 2003 http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=528&e=2&u=/ap/20031211/ap_on_hi_te/spam_indictment Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freeflir29 0 #2 December 11, 2003 It's the matress...I mean internet cops!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #3 December 12, 2003 Kallend will be pissed about this. He's for unrestricted free speech. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kennedy 0 #4 December 12, 2003 You obviously didn't see his posts in my thread about the the federal anti spam bill. examplewitty subliminal message Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards. 1* Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,174 #5 December 12, 2003 QuoteKallend will be pissed about this. He's for unrestricted free speech. Yes I am, but I'm not for someone else's unrestricted speech at my expense, which is what spam amounts to. You and I pay (directly or indirectly) for the resources used by spammers, just like we pay for the resources used by telemarketers.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
