0
Harksaw

Anti-terrorism pro-democracy demonstration in Baghdad

Recommended Posts

Its very interesting the lack of cover this has in mainstream news.

http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/13196.htm

http://frontpagemag.com/articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=11259


and here's a blog with pictures
http://healingiraq.blogspot.com/archives/2003_12_01_healingiraq_archive.html#107107940577248802
__________________________________________________
I started skydiving for the money and the chicks. Oh, wait.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Great story, it dramatically shows that there IS a bright side to the history being written in Iraq today. Yaaaaaaayyy! But where was all the news coverage? From the story:

Quote

Fox News Channel did a story, but the other cable channels, and the three national newscasts, said nothing about it.



If that's correct, then who is "fair and balanced", and who isn't? The network that carried the story, or the ones that ignored it?

Would any of you chronic FOX haters care to address this?


. . =(_8^(1)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wouldn't consider myself a chronic fox hater... haha
but as I posted, the NY post did a story on this. The NY times also reported it, but it was buried in the back with a story about an iraqi bank bombing of some kind on the front. It isn't on the front of foxnews.com either, and I couldn't find it there with an admittedly short search of their website.
__________________________________________________
I started skydiving for the money and the chicks. Oh, wait.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The news networks want drama.

Good, happy things don't usually promote drama.

You cannot sensationalize a good thing very easily. It warms the heart and promotes happieness and content. Content reduces drama and thus reduces the need to watch the news.

What the media wants is anger. Some want anger directed at specific political parties.
Ultimately they want ratings. Ratings don't come from happy stuff.

Sad ain't it?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>If that's correct, then who is "fair and balanced", and who isn't? The
>network that carried the story, or the ones that ignored it?

So fair and balanced apparently includes:

Al Jazeera
The New York Post
FOX News

I'll be sure to reference them the next time someone here asks for unbiased news coverage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
Quote


While the underdogs are barking freely in the streets of Baghdad, challenging the Ba'athist shadows and the jihadist terrorists, human rights and democracy groups in the West lack the courage to come to the rescue of their fellow progressive forces in the Middle East. As a group of Iraqi students told me, "Isn't it terrible to see that Western elites came here to demonstrate in support of Saddam against the Coalition, and when we took the streets to demonstrate against the Saddam war crimes, they didn't show up?"

Just goes to show what hypocrites the lefties are.

mh
"The mouse does not know life until it is in the mouth of the cat."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is because people are getting tired of this subject.

I found it a good read. Might because I was over there during the (COUGH COUGH "WAR")

I know it is bad for the guys on the ground. But those of us in the navy watched the war on CNN like everone else. Just our news was a day late.
Bottomless Beers and Blue Skies!

* Brother_Brian *
D.S.W.F.S.B. #2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I have no idea, but I wouldn't be a bit surprised to discover them to
> be more fair and balanced than CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, L.A. Pravda,
> etc . .

No doubt! After all, they have a clear political objective (just like Fox!) and they say "fair, objective" on their website, so they must be fair and objective. I'll look forward to your usage of them in coming weeks to present a more balanced view of current events.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Everybody must understand the rules of this forum. If a news story is anti-US then it is fact. If a news story is pro-US then it is biased and government propaganda and can not be used as fact in a debate. These are the rules. Everybody abide by them. Now, on with the debate (keeping this rule in mind of course).:P


"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do." Ben Franklin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bill....Because of my background....I have always made it a point to read ALL sources. Long before 9-11 I used to visit a site called Kavkaz.org. I got it shut down cause they were mixing terrorist funding.....but.....I found their side of the story interesting. It was mostly focused on Chechnya but went to other topics occasionally. If you aren't reading both sides....you can't begin to see the truth!;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

. . . and they say "fair, objective" on their website, so they must be fair and objective.



Saying you're something doesn't make you that thing; it is behavior that provides real definition.

So, to report or not to report on a positive event that occurred in Iraq? That is the question, and the answer tells a tale about the agenda behind each organization.

And what it tells me about the non-reporters is the same old yarn I've been hearing for years: The media left tells us what they want us to hear, in such a way as to make us think what they want us to think, so we'll vote the way they want us to vote, and become the society they want us to be, and on and on . . .

. . . thank God for cable news and the internet, eh?


. . =(_8^(1)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

While the underdogs are barking freely in the streets of Baghdad, challenging the Ba'athist shadows and the jihadist terrorists, human rights and democracy groups in the West lack the courage to come to the rescue of their fellow progressive forces in the Middle East. As a group of Iraqi students told me, "Isn't it terrible to see that Western elites came here to demonstrate in support of Saddam against the Coalition, and when we took the streets to demonstrate against the Saddam war crimes, they didn't show up?"

Just goes to show what hypocrites the lefties are.



But the lefties did show up! Look at the pictures of all the red flags with the hammer & sickle logos! You can't get much farther to the left than that!

Most of the demonstrators seem to be members of the Iraqi communist party (which was deposed when Saddam & the Baathist took power).
Speed Racer
--------------------------------------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0