0
AggieDave

F--k Dreamweaver!

Recommended Posts

Ok, I'm doing a site for a client, I got all the Flash work done so I'm getting the actual site layout/test site done for overall approval before I fully complete out the site. Well, instead of going with my tried and true Notepad and scripting out the HTML and the Syle Sheets by hand, I decided to try Dreamweaver out. Since everyone raves about it, though I'd see how it went.

It fucking blows. Now I'm having to go back and fix script by hand since it looks GREAT in Dreamweaver but its an abortion of a site when I open it in any browser.

Aggghhh, what a waste of time and energy.

Am I the only one that thinks Dreamweaver is a worthless POS?
--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Am I the only one that thinks Dreamweaver is a worthless POS?


Eh. Our Intranet is templated in Dreamweaver so I pretty much have to use it (the initial design choice was made before I joined the company). I never take it out of the split view because the code it generates requires an infuriating amount of hand tweaking. For static pages it works kinda sorta alright, I guess. Better than pretty much every other WYSIWYG HTML editor I've ever used, but that isn't saying much.

Hot tip: Never, ever, for any reason, ask Dreamweaver to generate even the simplest ASP or PHP for you. It will probably work, but if you later need to go beyond what Dreamweaver can do (which is to say, if you want a non-trivial app) and try to modify the code by hand it is practically impossible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, I'm really unimpressed with Dreamweaver...I was setting up a simple site, so I thought I'd try it. Embeded tables and style sheets. Thought that'd be easy enough for it.

Nope, last time I did any work with ASP, I did what I always do (until today), I open up Notepad and code it. That's how I've always done all of my programing. Even back when I was a CS major programing C and Java.

Hey, look at the link, I think I'm just tired, since I can't figure out why the tables aren't displaying like they should.
--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Here, see if yall see anything wrong with my scripting, I just went back and "fixed" some of the crap that Dreamweaver did, still no worky.

(please remember, this is a rough cut of the site).

http://www.texoma.net/~dlund/afs/main.htm


Yeah, it looks really wrong in Mozilla (attached).

Honestly, if this is all that you have done I would scrap it and start from scratch. Have you considered a tableless layout (look down the page) using CSS? I've been experimenting with it and it seems to work really well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Yeah, it looks really wrong in Mozilla (attached).



I have a question about your attachment. What are the two pages you "blurred" out that you didn't want us to see? :P
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, not much had been done, I was thinking of scrapping it, just didn't want to do that.

No, haven't played with the table-less stuff yet.

Honestly, I don't do many sites anymore, I'm so burnt out doing web development I can't fucking stand it. So I just want to be done, get paid and never do another site ever again. Something about doing websites since late 1994 just really burns you out.[:/]
--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
what-you-see-is-what-you-might-get-if-you're-lucky

I don't like wysiwyg editors cause on the rare occasion I make a website, I'm generally more interested in the server-side aspect of it to keep track of the content. The front end of the site usually ends up being rather utilitarian and orthogonal looking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I have a question about your attachment. What are the two pages you "blurred" out that you didn't want us to see? :P


Pretty much just run-of-the-mill midget scat porno. >:(

Actually, it's just some company email that has people's names in the subject. Didn't notice them until I had taken the screen shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Welcome to American Flight Services, Coulter Field (KCFD) located in Bryan, Texas. We are your one stop fuel stop with the highest quality A&P in the area. Also, free 20 gallons of fuel when you purchase a fresh bag of cookies.

_______________________________________________

Damn, I would tank up my Cessna 150 with you guys anytime! Any locations in Northern Cal?;)

Shawn

_________________

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I could not agree more ;)
It probably works fine for static pages, but not if you want anything more than that.

I've found VIm to be the best html editor out there.
Of course it takes some time getting used to.
It's for *nix system (there is a win32 version available too).
Syntax highlightning is very nice. Typos suck. It's not always fun to look for that missing " or > etc.
Regex search and replace comes in handy to.

There are only 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i like dreamweaver.

like someone else already stated - the latest version of mx has a great browser compatability check built in. you can test/view your pages and how they will look in different browsers and different versions of those browsers.

don't know.

sorry for your troubles - but i'm still a big fan of DW. been using it for about 4 or 5 yrs now.

good luck.

:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i am currently using Dreamweaver MX which in my opinion is a load of shite. Older versions that I have used in the past worked much better for my purpose as I usually hand edit and write within DW anyway.
The only thing I like about DM is site management and being able to make a change and propagate it thoughout the site.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think my attitude stinks you should smell my fingers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is Dreamfucker MX, but yesterday will be my only time to actually use it to make anything. I work faster and more efficiently if I just type it out in Notepad. I also don't have to spend 2 hours trying to figure out WTF did it do and why won't it do what I want. Then again, I've been doing professional web design by scripting everything out by hand for about 10 years, so its what I know.
--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The WYSIWYG editors are great if that's all you need to do and if you don't know HTML or just want to get some quick data up on the web. For anything else do it by hand. The last time I used FrontPage or DreamWeaver would have been when each released version 1 and that's probably the last I'll ever work with either of them. If I'm building a web page chances are it's got a lot of ASP, ASPX or JavaScript code in which case a WYSIWYG is worthless.

EditPlus looks cool though, I'm going to download it now and try it out.
Wind Tunnel and Skydiving Coach http://www.ariperelman.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0