0
juanesky

"Intellectual" diversity

Recommended Posts

It's a non-issue. There hasn't been any conspiracy to limit political conservatives from higher education.

It's just that the critical thinking skills that are learned and refined via higher education generally lead to more liberal viewpoints.

We go where logic takes us.:P
-Josh
If you have time to panic, you have time to do something more productive. -Me*
*Ron has accused me of plagiarizing this quote. He attributes it to Douglas Adams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It's just that the critical thinking skills that are learned and refined via higher education generally lead to more liberal viewpoints.



I could argue the indoctrination that takes place during higher education leads to more liberal viewpoints. You haven't said anything of substance here, other than a poorly veiled insult.

And just FYI - college is not the great liberalizer it once was. Fewer students coming out of college say they changed their political stance and fewer are being rated as liberals. Of course, the latter could be caused due to the people creating the test being so liberal that they rank even other liberals as conservative.

Quote

We go where logic takes us.



"Won't someone please think of the children."
"You're racist/homophobic/insert insult here."
"No."

That's the "logic" I encounter most often when I discuss controversial topics with diehard bleeding hearts.
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It's a non-issue. There hasn't been any conspiracy to limit political conservatives from higher education.

It's just that the critical thinking skills that are learned and refined via higher education generally lead to more liberal viewpoints.

We go where logic takes us.:P
-Josh



Wow. That sure is some assertion! I'm "higher educated" and I'm a happy mix of "right" and "left" and "center" views... Sure as hell, though, the "logic" of prohibitionist policies is not owned by either the left or the right. The left wants to prohibit guns despite evidence of abject failure of such attempts to decrease crime. The right thinks we can use prohibition against drugs and abortion, despite obvious proof that those don't do squat, either. Both sides have no legitimate explanation regarding why they have failed to learn the lesson that "the" Prohibition should have taught us. There is no excuse for continuing to believe in that folly, but still they argue for it, left and right.
-
-Jeffrey
"With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...preach on, brotherman, preach on...

anytime a politician says "war on" anything other than a country, I automatically distrust them now.

War on Drugs? yeah, that's worked.
War on Crime? mixed to mediocre results
War on Terror? patriot act, yeah that's good for us...

but hey, they're popular, and they get you elected, so let's just pass more useless legislation and say we promoted the War on Whatever
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


And just FYI - college is not the great liberalizer it once was. Fewer students coming out of college say they changed their political stance and fewer are being rated as liberals.



If this is true, then why open the can of worms that Horowitz proposes?

The article that started this thread quotes professor Stanley Fish out of context:

"It's hard to see how anyone who believes (as I do) that academic work is distinctive in its aims and goals and that its distinctiveness must be protected from political pressures (either external or internal) could find anything to disagree with here"

The reader is led to believe that even this liberal professor endorses the "Intellectual diversity bill of rights".

He does not, and makes an excellent case for why it's a bad idea here:
http://chronicle.com/free/v50/i23/23b01301.htm

-Josh
If you have time to panic, you have time to do something more productive. -Me*
*Ron has accused me of plagiarizing this quote. He attributes it to Douglas Adams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You may not know this, but WORLWIDE, higher education has been fertil grounds for Leftist movements, I can cite you 3 of them, in South America: Colombia, Peru and Venezuela have had Guerrillas promoted by doctrines taught in universities.

It is a good thing that at least the left in this country is not that rebellious and feels comfortable with the luxury this country allows them.

Don't you remember who was the commander in the rebel forces in Mexico?:P

I understand it is not all roses with the right, and thank god most are holding grounds in the middle but what you say makes no sense at all, first for any kids mind is off politics until the last years of high school. Other wise I don't see little kids (unless they are in Cuba or somewhere like it NK?) preaching politics do you?
"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow. That sure is some assertion! I'm "higher educated" and I'm a happy mix of "right" and "left" and "center" views... Sure as hell, though, the "logic" of prohibitionist policies is not owned by either the left or the right. The left wants to prohibit guns despite evidence of abject failure of such attempts to decrease crime. The right thinks we can use prohibition against drugs and abortion, despite obvious proof that those don't do squat, either. Both sides have no legitimate explanation regarding why they have failed to learn the lesson that "the" Prohibition should have taught us. There is no excuse for continuing to believe in that folly, but still they argue for it, left and right.
-



I pretty much agree with you.
The labels liberal and conservative are useless at best. They are often misleading, usually misnomers and worst, used as derogatory terms that contribute nothing to healthy debate.

"Liberals" tend to be fairly conservative when it comes to government intrusion into personal lives.
"Conservatives" tend to be rather liberal on the same issues, strongly endorsing the war on drugs, meddling in our bedroom affairs and so on.

The terms are somewhat more accurate when one is talking about government regulation of business.
That is, liberals tend to endorse government intervention in business practices, and conservatives do not.

Like you, I don't fit neatly under such labels. I take a variety of stances on different issues. Some generally considered liberal, some conservative, and some inbetween.

I think if one digs a little, they'll find that "intellectual bill of rights" is aptly named for all of the wrong reasons. Oops, I mean the extreme/religious right reasons.

-Josh
If you have time to panic, you have time to do something more productive. -Me*
*Ron has accused me of plagiarizing this quote. He attributes it to Douglas Adams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You may not know this, but WORLWIDE, higher education has been fertil grounds for Leftist movements, I can cite you 3 of them, in South America: Colombia, Peru and Venezuela have had Guerrillas promoted by doctrines taught in universities.
?



Hey, what about Mao? You could say that he espoused the ultimate leftism, and when he got power he then MURDERED the intellectual elite!

Leftists destroying themselves... Hmmm. We're no strangers to that notion: I just read today that Nader is thinking about running in November! I guess he likes handing the conservatives the presidency! :D LOL! Go Ralphie!!!
-
-Jeffrey
"With tha thoughts of a militant mind... Hard line, hard line after hard line!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

You may not know this, but WORLWIDE, higher education has been fertil grounds for Leftist movements, I can cite you 3 of them, in South America: Colombia, Peru and Venezuela have had Guerrillas promoted by doctrines taught in universities.



3 examples hardly constitute firtile ground.

Granted, there are probably more examples than that.
I suspect that neither of us are familiar enough with the political and educational systems of those countries to draw sound conclusions either way.



Quote

what you say makes no sense at all, first for any kids mind is off politics until the last years of high school. Other wise I don't see little kids (unless they are in Cuba or somewhere like it NK?) preaching politics do you?



What I say makes no sense?
I've no idea what your point is here, so I guess I feel your pain.:S
-Josh
If you have time to panic, you have time to do something more productive. -Me*
*Ron has accused me of plagiarizing this quote. He attributes it to Douglas Adams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It's a non-issue. There hasn't been any conspiracy to limit political conservatives from higher education.

It's just that the critical thinking skills that are learned and refined via higher education generally lead to more liberal viewpoints.





interestingly enough i was labeled as 'fascist' quite often by those who could not counter my arguments due to a simple lack of critical thinking skills......far easier to accuse than to analyze..

"you could make a choice but you never learned to think..."
____________________________________
Those who fail to learn from the past are simply Doomed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


3 examples hardly constitute firtile ground.

Granted, there are probably more examples than that.
I suspect that neither of us are familiar enough with the political and educational systems of those countries to draw sound conclusions either way.

you suspect wrong. I have been pretty close, lived and studied there, and that is perceived through most university in latin america.[:/]:(


Quote

what you say makes no sense at all, first for any kids mind is off politics until the last years of high school. Other wise I don't see little kids (unless they are in Cuba or somewhere like it NK?) preaching politics do you?



What I say makes no sense?
I've no idea what your point is here, so I guess I feel your pain.:S
-Josh



Same thing that you got replied, that all those critical, are not intellectual enough, because otherwise they would be liberal:P
"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You may not know this, but WORLWIDE, higher education tends to be fertil grounds for Leftist movements



That needed correction.
"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0