0
Gravitymaster

Kerry Implodes ????

Recommended Posts

Anybody who thinks polls this far out have any significance is kidding themselves. With that said:

http://www.zogby.com/news/021804.html

From the article:

Q. Who would do a better job of dealing with Al Qaeda, Saddam Hussein, Moammar Gaddafi, North Korea and Iran? George W. Bush or John Kerry?

Fifty-percent of voters said Bush would do a better job compared to the 33% of voters who felt John Kerry would do a better job. Fifty-eight percent of current military members and 53% of veterans feel that Bush would do a better job while 32% of current military members and 27% of veterans gave the nod to Kerry. Gun owners and investors by overwhelming margins of 63% to 23% and 58% to 28% respectively, feel Bush would do a better job in dealing with rogue states and leaders. Non-investors also thought Bush would do a better job in dealing with rogue states and leaders by a margin of 48% to 35%. Church-goers and non-church-goers alike thought Bush would do a better job. Daily church-goers and weekly church-goers favored Bush by margins of 57% to 22% and 62% to 21% respectively. Non-church goers also favored Bush to deal with rogue nations and leaders by a 42% to 36% margin. Forty-nine percent of NASCAR, high school sports and little league sports fans think Bush would do a better job of dealing with rogue states and leaders and 33% felt that Kerry was the better choice. Forty-eight percent of non-NASCAR fans also thought Bush would be better to deal with rogue states and leaders while 32% favored Kerry.

And

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Presidential_Tracking_Poll.htm

February 18, 2004--President George W. Bush now leads Massachusetts Senator John F. Kerry by five points in the latest Rasmussen Reports Presidential Tracking Poll. As of this morning, Bush attracts support from 48% of the nation's likely voters while Kerry is the choice for 43%.

"Dream on, Dream on, Dream on wahhhhhhhhhhhhh:ph34r::ph34r::ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Anybody have any thoughts as to why Dean ended his campaign but is keeping his name on the ballot and is encouraging his supporter NOT to back any of the other Candidates?



Maybe he inhaled......:P
"According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Does Heinz have any oversees holdings? Probably, but then again WTF does that have to do with John Keryy anyway? The decisions of the corporation are made by a board of directors and a CEO, of which Kerry is neither I'm fairly sure. Again, you can google just as easily as I can.



Perhaps the purpose is to compare Heinz's incredible success as a corporation, with the record of the companies that GWB ran into the ground despite having family money pumped in to them.

Would YOU invest in a company that had GWB as CEO?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Anybody have any thoughts as to why Dean ended his campaign but is keeping his name on the ballot and is encouraging his supporter NOT to back any of the other Candidates?



Where did you get that from? Saw his speech announcing he was no longer running and said he would back whichever candidate got the nomination, he's just not endorsing anyone else for the primary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just a general question:

It used to be about a 40% to 40% partisan split with a need to appeal to the remaining 20% swing.

Where do we think we really are today?

I'm thinking it's even worse now - like 48/48/4.

In other words, the swing vote is now about as big as the wackos on either end so any gain one candidate can make by appealing to the middle will be balanced by the loss of the extremists from their own party.

I wonder if the actual positions of the candidates will have any impact. Rather, whoever can minimize voter apathy the most will likely pull it off.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



Does Heinz have any oversees holdings? Probably, but then again WTF does that have to do with John Keryy anyway? The decisions of the corporation are made by a board of directors and a CEO, of which Kerry is neither I'm fairly sure. Again, you can google just as easily as I can.



Perhaps the purpose is to compare Heinz's incredible success as a corporation, with the record of the companies that GWB ran into the ground despite having family money pumped in to them.

Would YOU invest in a company that had GWB as CEO?



Uh, I think the answer to this question is quite obvious. I think it's very funny that the campaign in 2000 concentrated on the fact that Bush was a businessman and would run the country like a business. Turns out he's run it just like all the other businesses he ran, with revenues falling far short of expenditures. Did they really teach him that this was good business practice at Harvard or was he maybe asleep?

Never go to a DZ strip show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote



Does Heinz have any oversees holdings? Probably, but then again WTF does that have to do with John Keryy anyway? The decisions of the corporation are made by a board of directors and a CEO, of which Kerry is neither I'm fairly sure. Again, you can google just as easily as I can.



Perhaps the purpose is to compare Heinz's incredible success as a corporation, with the record of the companies that GWB ran into the ground despite having family money pumped in to them.

Would YOU invest in a company that had GWB as CEO?



Uh, I think the answer to this question is quite obvious. I think it's very funny that the campaign in 2000 concentrated on the fact that Bush was a businessman and would run the country like a business. Turns out he's run it just like all the other businesses he ran, with revenues falling far short of expenditures. Did they really teach him that this was good business practice at Harvard or was he maybe asleep?



When stockholders lose faith in the management of a corporation, they sell their stock and it's value drops. Didn't investors in Bush's company get about 10 cents on the dollar?

When the international financial community loses faith in the management of a country, they sell its currency and the value of the currency drops.

How's the dollar doing?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

When the international financial community loses faith in the management of a country, they sell its currency and the value of the currency drops.

How's the dollar doing?

Quote



Shouldn't this make Libs happy? With the US being the filthy rich of the world, this is essentially allowing the poorer countries to buy products cheaper than us. (Much like a progressive tax does). That's pretty compassionate if one were to take that sort of twisted position.

:P


...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Anybody have any thoughts as to why Dean ended his campaign but is keeping his name on the ballot and is encouraging his supporter NOT to back any of the other Candidates?



Where did you get that from? Saw his speech announcing he was no longer running and said he would back whichever candidate got the nomination, he's just not endorsing anyone else for the primary.



Thats what I meant. Usually when a candidate ends their quest, they throw their support to another candidate i.e. Gephardt, Lieberman, Clark. Probably means nothing more than he wants to withhold his support so he can have some influence on the eventual nominees platform. Just thought it was a bit unusual, thats all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>this is essentially allowing the poorer countries to buy products cheaper than us.

Well, no, it just allows other countries to buy US-produced products for cheaper than they used to. It still costs China just as much to buy stuff from Japan or Egypt. There is trade outside the US.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Well, no, it just allows other countries to buy US-produced products for cheaper than they used to. It still costs China just as much to buy stuff from Japan or Egypt. There is trade outside the US.



And becuase of all the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs to other countries, there ain't much being produced here anymore. Most of the stuff we buy ourselves isn't produced here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Well, no, it just allows other countries to buy US-produced products for cheaper than they used to. It still costs China just as much to buy stuff from Japan or Egypt. There is trade outside the US.



And becuase of all the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs to other countries, there ain't much being produced here anymore. Most of the stuff we buy ourselves isn't produced here.



AND FROM FOX NEWS:

www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,111287,00.html

The administration's argument is that by outsourcing low-skilled jobs to cheap destinations, companies will have the resources to train American workers in high-skilled fields.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


It's gone pretty quiet here.

Where is all the dirt on Kerry and Heinz?

Maybe the investigation has been "outsourced".



Or it's being investigated under the "Patriot Act" ?
------------------------------------------------
Why get married? Just find a woman you hate and buy her a house.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


It's gone pretty quiet here.

Where is all the dirt on Kerry and Heinz?

Maybe the investigation has been "outsourced".



With 35 years of "being wrong" and a war chest of over 100 million dollars, I predict an onslaught in the next few months. At least thats what I heard at the last Secret Meeting at which I was issued my decoder ring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


It's gone pretty quiet here.

Where is all the dirt on Kerry and Heinz?

Maybe the investigation has been "outsourced".



Yep, even Drudge's site contains not a whisper of the alleged Kerry affair. Maybe it's the calm before the storm? :o



Timing is everything. :D



never pull low......unless you are

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0