0
peacefuljeffrey

Democrats bite their own noses to spite their faces

Recommended Posts

Quote


Sen. John Warner, R-Va., who opposed the assault weapons ban when Congress approved it 10 years ago but supported the amendment Tuesday ...

Extending the assault weapons ban was the most important issue for gun control groups because the 1994 ban is set to expire Sept. 13. Supporters of the ban cite federal statistics showing crimes involving assault weapons have declined by two-thirds in the past decade.



Does anyone else find this quote hilarious? So let's see, you can no longer buy "assault weapons" for 10 years and the crimes where people used "assault weapons" in the past 10 years have declined? Hmmm...

I banned potatos at my house 10 years ago, so there has been a 2/3 reduction in potato eating at my house in the last decade. I wonder if that's because the only way to get potatos now is to sneak them in when I'm not looking.

Gee, I wonder if the people who woulda used "assault weapons" just went ahead and committed their violent crime with something that anti-gun people think you can't "assault" someone with.

Maybe we should call "guns" "boom-sticks". Then we'd have ZERO "gun" violence in the US.
Oh, hello again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

it's so sad that the victims of gun violence will still be able to (unsuccessfully) seek financial damages from gun manufacturers.



The Bill would not have banned lawsuits for defective products or illegal sales. It would simply have made the gun-makers immune from lawsuits filed by victims of criminal violence. The gun manufacturer is not responsible for the criminal misuse of their legal products.

Since you favor this type of action, should we also presume that you are in favor of victims of drunk drivers suing auto manufacturers? Victims of prescription drug overdoses suing prescription drug manufacturers? Victims of arson suing the gasoline manufacturer?



I didn't say any of that John, I just think that legislation giving basic immunity to an industry is wrong, it's simply a product of corporate lobbying. They aren't going to stop making guns if they can continue to be sued. And if someone wants to sue, if they are willing to pay the court costs if they lose... or if they can show proximate cause and win, at any rate, that's for judges and juries, not legislatures.

Never go to a DZ strip show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



The reason I would need the 11th round in a magazine would be when I pull the trigger the 10th time and the threat isn't neutralized.



Are you that bad of a shot? Schoolkids run too fast?:P



That's offensive and not funny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote



The reason I would need the 11th round in a magazine would be when I pull the trigger the 10th time and the threat isn't neutralized.



Are you that bad of a shot? Schoolkids run too fast?:P



I thought it was quite laughable, I mean come on, what do you need more than 10 bullets for unless maybe you intend to kill multiple people?

That's offensive and not funny.



Never go to a DZ strip show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

The reason I would need the 11th round in a magazine would be when I pull the trigger the 10th time and the threat isn't neutralized.



Are you that bad of a shot? Schoolkids run too fast?:P



In my opinion, you are "over the line" with that comment. Just because someone wants a pistol magazine that holds more than 10 rounds, does not mean that they are out to shoot schoolchildren. Making such vile comments only hurts your own reputation.



My own reputation as what? School shootings, as a recent epidemic, are done by... wait for it.... GUNS!!! We have a new sniper here in NorCal. They are using a GUN!!!. We are no longer the hunter/gatherers that all need weapons. I'd like to see someone actually use the 2nd amendment for what it really is... "the right to bear arms to rise up against corrupt governments"... oh wait, gun ownwers SUPPORT this current governments.

I don't think manufacturers are liable for the mis-deeds of owners, but we also don't need assault weapons and pistols on every street corner.


Blog Clicky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

They aren't going to stop making guns if they can continue to be sued. And if someone wants to sue, if they are willing to pay the court costs if they lose... or if they can show proximate cause and win, at any rate, that's for judges and juries, not legislatures.



That's exactly the problem, though. Small arms manufacturers have been put out of business defending lawsuits of this type. It's a tactic used by anti-gun groups to drive them out of business.

Imagine if a group of anti-skydivers decided to file numerous suits against a dz for injuries that jumpers sustained due to no fault of the dz. The dz provided the facilities and services that were expected, but the jumper did something stupid, reckless or illegal that caused their injury. Than sues based on that. It would put the dz out of business.

I agree that there should be blanket legislation to elliminate frivolous lawsuits for all manufacturers/businesses. But in this instance there is an ongoing campaign to drive gun manufacturers out of business through multiple lawsuits being filed by special interests. That it is why specific legislation is needed in this case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Imagine if a group of anti-skydivers decided to file numerous suits against a dz for injuries that jumpers sustained due to no fault of the dz. The dz provided the facilities and services that were expected, but the jumper did something stupid, reckless or illegal that caused their injury. Than sues based on that. It would put the dz out of business.



Well then I, I'd just haveta kill em I say, put em down like the rotten dogs they are. Seriously though, how much of an effect is the frivolous law suit epedemic having on the gun industry, how many manufacturers have been shut down, how many jobs have been lost, what's the economic impact? Are they suing winchester, or the maker of the tech-9? I see no problem with setting up evidentiary and procedural requirements for such a suit to go forward, but giving blanket immunity? Kev, you should know that's just corporate welfare dyed in the wool.

Never go to a DZ strip show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Are you that bad of a shot? Schoolkids run too fast?:P



That's offensive and not funny.



Kids bringing guns to school and killing their classmates? That's offensive and not funny.

Adults shooting at children on playgrounds? That's offensive and not funny.


Blog Clicky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Seriously though, how much of an effect is the frivolous law suit epedemic having on the gun industry, how many manufacturers have been shut down, how many jobs have been lost, what's the economic impact?



Would answers to these questions change your mind?

-
Jim
"Like" - The modern day comma
Good bye, my friends. You are missed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Quote

Seriously though, how much of an effect is the frivolous law suit epedemic having on the gun industry, how many manufacturers have been shut down, how many jobs have been lost, what's the economic impact?



Would answers to these questions change your mind?


-
Jim



Well, it would certainly fuel thought...

Never go to a DZ strip show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, while it was mostly Democrats, there were a significant number of Republicans that had to cross the aisle for this to pass 52-47.

Vote Count HERE.

I, uh, notice that you appear to have little pull in your own home state of Florida. Did you vote?

Did you write your Senators about the subject? I did.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Well, while it was mostly Democrats, there were a significant number of Republicans that had to cross the aisle for this to pass 52-47.

Vote Count HERE.

I, uh, notice that you appear to have little pull in your own home state of Florida. Did you vote?



10 Rep as a matter of fact!

Damn libs...:P:S


Blog Clicky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


I ask again...what do you think the definition of assault weapon is as it relates to the bill?



IMHO... full auto? large clips? Can shoot through buildings?



Well....than you might want to actually read the bill before spouting off your support for it. Full auto has been restricted since long before the assault weapon ban and this ban has nothing to do with full auto weapons.

Can shoot through buildings? I don't even know what that is supposed to mean. A .22 can shoot through some buildings....???????? Again, this has nothing to do with the existing bill.

Large clips (actually magazines)...why? I have a Glock 9mm. In it's original design, 17 rounds fit in the magazine that fits completely within the grip. It was designed for the number of rounds, it was designed to fit my hand, that's just what fits in there. Now, I can only have 10 round mags (although I have 17 round mags because mine were manufactured before the ban, but ignore that for a second). Suppose I only have 10 round mags....well, I can carry 2 of them, or 5 , or 10. It' takes a second to change magazines. What's the point? What good does it do? Don't you think a restricting law should have some benefit?

So, out of what you want banned, the only part of it that this bill covers is the magazine capacity limit, which, is really pretty useless. Please tell me what the benefit of that restriction is. Don't reply with "why do you need that many rounds". The answer is, because I do. If you want to restrict what I want, than give me a good reason why it makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Well....than you might want to actually read the bill before spouting off your support for it.



Easy now... I NEVER said I supported the bill. I am just sick of the rationalizations of pro-gun folks...


Quote

If you want to restrict what I want, than give me a good reason why it makes sense.



Again... I NEVER said I supported the bill, but why do people need these weapons? To defend themselves from other gun-toting folks? And PLEASE don't quote the 2nd amendment.


Blog Clicky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Seriously though, how much of an effect is the frivolous law suit epedemic having on the gun industry, how many manufacturers have been shut down, how many jobs have been lost, what's the economic impact?



Do a little research on the subject, my friend. The industry has spent $40,000,000 on defending themselves against these bullshit lawsuits, which have all but a few been dismissed. What do you think is the net worth of Ruger firearms, the largest gun mfgr in the country? (hint: say less than what the industry has paid so far)

Yes, these lawsuits bring in all the manufacturers to defend themselves. Most of the city lawsuits have a laundry list of defendants. They are suing Winchester AND the maker of the tec-9 (which operates exactly the same as a 1911 or a SIG, btw--one pull, one round, single action).

These lawsuits set precedence so lawyers can go after other law-abiding manufacturers of legal products--many of which are used by law enforcement. After the gun manufacturers are shut down (defacto gun control) precedent will be established for lawsuits against Budweiser, Chevrolet, Harley Davidson, General Electric, Jack Daniels, Porter-Cable and the list goes on. Ya think Performance Designs and Relative Workshop will fit in there somewhere? Bet your ass when they want to shut down skydiving, that's how they do it.

Make no mistake, if a company is found to be criminally liable or negligent, all lawsuit preemptions are off. Sue away, in those cases. Just don't go after people to close them down.

Seriously, do a little research on the matter. NSSF is a great place to start.

mike

Girls only want boyfriends who have great skills--You know, like nunchuk skills, bow-hunting skills, computer-hacking skills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Easy now... I NEVER said I supported the bill. I am just sick of the rationalizations of pro-gun folks...



Yeah, sometimes the cold hard facts of the matter are hard to deal with.:P

mike

Girls only want boyfriends who have great skills--You know, like nunchuk skills, bow-hunting skills, computer-hacking skills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Seriously though, how much of an effect is the frivolous law suit epedemic having on the gun industry, how many manufacturers have been shut down, how many jobs have been lost, what's the economic impact?



Do a little research on the subject, my friend. The industry has spent $40,000,000 on defending themselves against these bullshit lawsuits, which have all but a few been dismissed. What do you think is the net worth of Ruger firearms, the largest gun mfgr in the country? (hint: say less than what the industry has paid so far)

Yes, these lawsuits bring in all the manufacturers to defend themselves. Most of the city lawsuits have a laundry list of defendants. They are suing Winchester AND the maker of the tec-9 (which operates exactly the same as a 1911 or a SIG, btw--one pull, one round, single action).

These lawsuits set precedence so lawyers can go after other law-abiding manufacturers of legal products--many of which are used by law enforcement. After the gun manufacturers are shut down (defacto gun control) precedent will be established for lawsuits against Budweiser, Chevrolet, Harley Davidson, General Electric, Jack Daniels, Porter-Cable and the list goes on. Ya think Performance Designs and Relative Workshop will fit in there somewhere? Bet your ass when they want to shut down skydiving, that's how they do it.

Make no mistake, if a company is found to be criminally liable or negligent, all lawsuit preemptions are off. Sue away, in those cases. Just don't go after people to close them down.

Seriously, do a little research on the matter. NSSF is a great place to start.



See, Republicans are just as much conspiracy theorists as dems...

Never go to a DZ strip show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gaff it off if you want. Chalk it up to conspiracy theories. Whatever. I spent my time to answer your questions.

Why do you think that this bill had 60 sponsors in the senate? You think the gun industry has that much clout? HA! Remember that little list of other manufacturers in my post above? A bunch of them were part of a huge push to get this legislation to pass. Look it up.

Unfortunately, I won't be doing any more of your homework for you.

(edit: Oh, and I am not a republican, if that's what you were inferring.)

mike

Girls only want boyfriends who have great skills--You know, like nunchuk skills, bow-hunting skills, computer-hacking skills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Read this thread again. Understand what this bill was about. Understand what the "assault weapons" ban is. Understand what the "gunshow" loophole will really do. The facts have all been laid out fairly clearly for you to read.

I am glad you no longer believe that an "assault weapon" as defined in the Clinton Gun Ban is a fully automatic firearm. That's a step in the right direction. Keep paying attention, we'll have ya up to speed in no time.:P

mike

Girls only want boyfriends who have great skills--You know, like nunchuk skills, bow-hunting skills, computer-hacking skills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awwww, fuck it.

Here's a few of the associations that were pushing for the lawsuit legislation to pass:
The United States Chamber of Commerce
The United Mineworkers of America
The National Association of Manufacturers
United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Impliment Workers of America
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
United Steel Workers
National Association of Wholesalers-Distributers
The American Tort Reform Association
The Senate Sportsman's Caucus
National Association of Independant Insurers
American Insurance Association

mike

Girls only want boyfriends who have great skills--You know, like nunchuk skills, bow-hunting skills, computer-hacking skills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So what REALLY is the gun show loophole? Besides no background checks....

And let's keep this as good debate, not condescending... we can all play at that game.

I just say... we don't need guns! From my previous post: but why do people need these weapons? To defend themselves from other gun-toting folks? And PLEASE don't quote the 2nd amendment.


Blog Clicky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Supporters of the ban cite federal statistics showing crimes involving assault weapons have declined by two-thirds in the past decade.



That's based upon BATF firearm traces. The periodic studies based upon these traces are called "YCGII/Crime Gun Trace Reports", and the latest available report I can find is from 1999. So they must be digging up as-yet unreleased information to use to try and get the ban extended, which will otherwise expire in September.

The problem with the data is this: it depends upon data collected by tracing guns used in crime.

Here is a reference which explains the problem with using that data, rendering it useless for such conclusions. Useless to everyone except the anti-gun politicians, that is, who aren't interested in the truth.

The Misuse of BATF Firearms Tracing Data

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0