0
skymama

A "surprising new use for the parachute"

Recommended Posts

That was the lead-in to the next ABC World News Story in a few minutes. It looks like they're testing putting paracutes on small planes to help with smooth landings. Turn it on if you're at home to see it, they're having commercials now.

Edit: Yep, they're putting "rocket propelled" parachutes on the tops of small airplanes now. They've already saved 3 lives so far. The cost is $3,000-$10,000, and they're hoping to have the technology to put them on commercial flights someday. Cool!
She is Da Man, and you better not mess with Da Man,
because she will lay some keepdown on you faster than, well, really fast. ~Billvon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

That was the lead-in to the next ABC World News Story in a few minutes. It looks like they're testing putting paracutes on small planes to help with smooth landings. Turn it on if you're at home to see it, they're having commercials now.

Edit: Yep, they're putting "rocket propelled" parachutes on the tops of small airplanes now. They've already saved 3 lives so far. The cost is $3,000-$10,000, and they're hoping to have the technology to put them on commercial flights someday. Cool!



I think this has been around on the GA aircraft for about 10 years now. BillVon? Quade? Anyone else know for sure when they started putting these on? I know this isn't new to this year. That's for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It looks like they're testing putting paracutes on small planes to help with smooth landings.



Smooth is relative I guess... the aircraft will be destroyed. But any landing you can walk away from...

They've been used for years on ultralights and homebuilts, and saved hundreds of lives. Only new thing is putting them on certified aircraft. The idea makes a lot of sense for an ultralight or something else that is likely to suffer a structural failure. Wouldn't make any sense to try something like that on an airliner. It would be extremely dangerous actually. Just imagine an inadvertant firing. BAAAAD. I'm skepticle of their usefulness on Cessna 152s and 172s. Structural failures almost never happen, it probably won't save you in a low altitude stall/spin situation, and a deadstick landing may be a better option in the case of an engine failure, depending on what terrain you're flying over. (same reason we all use square reserves nowadays)

I think bigger news is the new use of airbags in aircraft. They're mounted inside the seatbelt. A couple small plane manufacturers will be offering them very soon, and they'll be appearing on airliners in bulkhead rows very soon. They allow the airline to put seats closer to the bulkhead, so they can fit an extra row. How wonderful.

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
It's nothing new. BRS was putting slug-fired chutes on ultralights at least 20 years ago, and they've been on GA A/C for at least ten years that I know of, maybe more.

mh

ps - For the curious, BRS is a slug-fired system inspired by designs for ejection seats...B|

.
"The mouse does not know life until it is in the mouth of the cat."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It's nothing new. BRS was putting slug-fired chutes on ultralights at least 20 years ago, and they've been on GA A/C for at least ten years that I know of, maybe more.

mh

ps - For the curious, BRS is a slug-fired system inspired by designs for ejection seats...B|

.




That's what I thought. I love how the press announces something as "new" whenever they feel like it. Kinda like when the press and 20/20 announced a new drug kids were using called X. Uhhh...like that was around when Raves first started in the late 80s early 90s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

BRS and Second Chantz were in the ultra-light recovery parachute business starting in the early 80's.



Yep, Dad had one on his GT400 and another one on the Rans.;)

Never look down on someone, unless they are going down on you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Darn. Got beaten to it....

But here's a pic from that website.

;)
FunBobby

Edited - whoops, attachment did not work. Trying again.



That's not a parachute - that's a n umbrella>:( - where are the toggles?
:):P
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

That was the lead-in to the next ABC World News Story in a few minutes. It looks like they're testing putting paracutes on small planes to help with smooth landings. Turn it on if you're at home to see it, they're having commercials now.

Edit: Yep, they're putting "rocket propelled" parachutes on the tops of small airplanes now. They've already saved 3 lives so far. The cost is $3,000-$10,000, and they're hoping to have the technology to put them on commercial flights someday. Cool!



I think this has been around on the GA aircraft for about 10 years now. BillVon? Quade? Anyone else know for sure when they started putting these on? I know this isn't new to this year. That's for sure.



The first patent for such a system (not rocket, though) dates to about 1935. The predictions that everyone would have one within 10 years accompanied the news release back then.


Blue skies,

Winsor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0