0
happythoughts

condom testing

Recommended Posts

clicky

Quote

WASHINGTON - The consumers group best known for rating cars and washing machines has turned its testing prowess to condoms to find out which ones measure up best and how other birth control methods compare.



This is the scary part:

Quote

A melon-colored model distributed by Planned Parenthood performed the worst, bursting during a test in which the latex condoms were filled with air.



PP distributes condoms that break. I'll bet that keeps them in business. :S

"Hi, I'm here to help with the condom testing..."
:ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

PP distributes condoms that break. I'll bet that keeps them in business.



Gee, maybe because they have to spend their money on things like scanning for bombs and protecting patients from protestors.

Last time I used a condom, I didn't fill it with air until it was 3 feet wide and a foot long. Didn't need to....got that big when I put it on :P:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Gee, maybe because they have to spend their money on things like scanning for bombs and protecting patients from protestors.



There are two primary considerations.
1. They distribute the condoms freely and in bulk. Condoms purchased in bulk cannot be so expensive that a cost difference would matter. Do you really think they considered the cost in selecting a defective product?

2. Their primary goal is "planned parenthood". If they weren't planning on helping, why would they open their doors?

Condoms have an effectiveness rate of 85-95%. I am sure that they would be horrified at the thought of reducing that rate.

Maybe the study will cause them to purchase a better product.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Condoms purchased in bulk cannot be so expensive that a cost difference would matter



What's the cost difference between a million items at one cent each or two cents each?

Quote

Do you really think they considered the cost in selecting a defective product?



Who said it was defective? That implies it doesn't work as designed. Maybe these weren't designed to be filled with a 3 cubic feet of air.

Quote

Maybe the study will cause them to purchase a better product.



Maybe it will. Maybe someone will then to a study to say that distributing half as many condoms that are 2% more effective results in more pregnancies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I can tell you that the extra $10 in condoms



Ok, I'll give you a ten dollars. You give me a million pennies. Deal, or do you want to check your math?



Quote

After raising a child, I can tell you that the extra $10 in condoms will certainly pale when compared to the cost of children (or any alternatives).



At a penny-extra apiece, the extra $10 would buy someone a lot of condoms (1,000) versus the cost of raising a child (estimated at $170k for 18 years) or an alternative ($500 for an abortion).

Most people would be ok with kicking in $10 given those alternatives.

I can't believe we are arguing about the good sense of buying condoms that work. :S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

3 feet wide and a foot long



That's one ODD-SHAPED dick you got there, PK. :o



Yeah...but I can tie it into shapes, like dachsunds, and giraffes.



Don't get near Muscat during a boogie! :o >:(

ltdiver

Don't tell me the sky's the limit when there are footprints on the moon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0